Costco
sells at prices far below other stores (on some items) because they buy case lots of baby products at very low cost to themselves, then they sell it to the consumer for great savings.
Not exact matches
There is now
far more demand for options to
sell Brent than there is for call options, which are the right to buy Brent
at a certain
price.
He rates the stock «underperform» — Wall Street speak for
sell — as he believes it is overvalued even
at current depressed
prices, citing the risk that investors» sentiment on the company will sour
further if it is accused of fraud or «other impropriety» surfaces.
The same is true when markets drop and investors move and wind up
selling at the lowest
price in order to remove themselves from the pain of potential
further portfolio losses.
Interestingly, compared to homes in the suburbs and condos, Toronto homes are
far more likely to be
sold over asking
price (yesterday, 33 were
sold under, 23 were
sold over and five were
sold at asking).
But bakeries tend to
sell at 30 % to 50 % of their gross annual revenues; for this one, that amounts to what insiders consider a
far more likely
price range of $ 67,800 to $ 113,000.
The share
price surge of the Internet - based retailer and cloud services company since the market
sell - off
at the beginning of the year has
far outpaced the other so - called FANG stocks of Facebook (fb), Netflix (nflx), and Google - parent Alphabet (googl) that led the broad U.S. market in 2015.
For purposes of the offering in Canada, if all of the shares have not been
sold, after the Canadian underwriters have made a reasonable effort to
sell the shares
at the public offer
price, the Canadian underwriters may from time to time decrease or change the offering
price and the other
selling terms provided that the
price for the shares shall not exceed the public offer
price and
further provided that the compensation that is realized by the Canadian underwriters will be decreased by the amount that the aggregate
price paid by the purchasers for the shares is less than the gross proceeds paid by the Canadian underwriters to us or the
selling stockholders.
Producer
prices, which measure the cost of goods and services
sold among businesses, have risen
at almost a 3.5 percent annual rate so
far this year, well above the Fed's informal 2 percent target.
Two of the most expensive units to
sell so
far were
priced at $ 24.95 million and $ 19.9 million, StreetEasy data shows.
The Series A Preferred shall also be convertible into any future series of Preferred Stock (the «Future Preferred») under either of the following circumstances: (a) if such conversion is approved by the Board or (b) if such conversion is in connection with a future Preferred Stock equity financing in which the Company's fully diluted pre-money valuation is greater than the Company's fully diluted post-money valuation immediately following the Series A Financing contemplated by this term sheet (a «Future Financing»), in either case, on a one - for - one basis (subject to anti-dilution adjustment)
at the option of the holder; provided however, if such conversion is in connection with a Future Financing, that the holder may convert into shares of Future Preferred only in the event that all of such shares of Future Preferred received by the holder upon conversion are
sold to an Approved Investor (as defined below) no later than 90 days following the first closing of the Future Financing
at a
price per share no lower than the
price per share
at which the Company
sells shares of such Future Preferred in the Future Financing and, provided
further, that such Approved Investor is not an affiliate, family member, or related party of the holder.
They were
far more interested in whether Yahoo's web, email, news and other businesses will finally be
sold — and
at what
price.
Indeed, many units are going through multiple
price cuts before
selling at far lower
prices.
«Exporters were encouraged to
sell cheaper to other countries to remove the surplus production and
at the same time earn quota to ship to the US, which was by
far the highest
price.
«We have been successful in recovering this increased cost in our
selling prices over the last few months, but we continue to monitor Platts for any
further increases,» Keane reported
at an analysts meeting.
In the recent years ITS have been awarded «Master Distributor» status allowing us to
sell our products
at further discounted
prices whilst also offering full technical support and a 24 hr direct online service from the Alfa Laval European distribution centre in Denmark.
1) Ten years without a significant trophy yet the Manager is never questioned 2)
Selling off key «World beater» Players season after season and replacing them with mediocre
at best replacements 3) Keeping a 33 % shareholder who is one of the world's richest men AND a true football fan as
far away from the board as possible 4) Charging possibly the highest
prices in Europe but NOT reinvesting within the team in any really significant way 5) Classing 4th place in the EPL as a trophy 6) Boasting of a # 100 million war chest for transfers then quibbling over a few hundred thousand on deals.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look
at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has
far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and
far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as
far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means
selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality
at the striker position falls once again squarely
at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket
prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «
selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the
price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame
at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
With the government removing fuel subsidies and oil marketers refusing to
sell diesel
at pump
prices, the cost of doing business in Nigeria is expected to double over the next three months especially as oil hits a benchmark
price of $ 38 per barrel with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) predicting a
further drop to $ 20 per barrel by mid-year.
The source
further revealed that NLC would interface with leadership of the oil marketers to prevail on them to compel their members to
sell fuel to the public
at the official pump
price.
But some are being
sold at a
far greater mark - up, including a silk shirtdress which is on the US website
at a special
price of $ 99.99 (# 63) before tax, but in the London shop for more than three times as much
at # 198.
Further more, weddingdresstrend also
sells other high quality dresses
at favorable
prices.
Block - busting in this case is the practice of purposefully
selling a house to a Black family in an all - white community and then pressure the white families to
sell their properties
at a
price below market value «in order to «get out» before more blacks moved in and their home values dropped even
further.»
Since 2008 doing approx 1000 miles per year, I put it through an mot on the 10th January, it passed without advisories;; The underneath is very solid indeed and doesn't need any work, the current paint was done approx 7 years ago to a good standard but is not perfect, when it had a change from Albert Blue (traces of it around the battery boxes) to the current black;; It still has the US import sticker on the left side door post, the original chassis plate and the chassis stamp on the bulkhead are all there;; It drives very well, I've driven it for circa 40 miles with no problems;; It has 15» Fuchs alloys and the spare is a chrome steel wheel;; The rear end has been «modernised»
at some point, I personally would remove the rear Porsche reflector and fit an original panel and bumper stops to get it back to the original pre impact bumper look, I could do this for you if required, cost circa GBP 800;; The seats have been changed to 80's leather recaros and the door cards to a later style, again I'd put some period seats in and back date the door cards if required
at cost
price;; The 80's recaros are worth good money so shouldn't be too much
further expense if they were sold separately;; Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of
further expense if they were
sold separately;;
Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of
Further information to come but please contact me if you have any queries;; In summary, a really good looking classic 911Targa, that is great value and can be enjoyed as is, or improved for not a lot of money;;
There are other manufacturers too that offer hybrid technology in some of their cars, while Toyota has no words on the Camry yet, we think Honda might stop
selling the Accord in India since the car is a CBU and is already
priced at quite a premium and now the cost
further goes up.
My guess is than when these new models finally appear, they will be
far from perfect, as the makers will be cutting corners to be able to
sell them
at a reasonable
price, and use not the best engines and transmissions and interiors etc etc..
However, if you want to make the most money (especially on Amazon, which only allows authors to receive 70 percent in royalties if the book is
priced at $ 2.99 or higher — $ 1.99 and $ 0.99 books only allow authors a 35 percent royalty rate), then $ 4.99 appears to be the best
price point for
selling a good amount of books (though
far less than with a lower
price point) while making the most in profit.
Coming in
at $ 299 it's more expensive than the $ 279
price point we were told back in January, but isn't
far out of the realm of what Chromebooks being
sold at currently...
This is interesting because it shows that however many comics comiXology is
selling at that 99 - cent
price point, there are
far more customers willing to pay full
price for this week's new comics.
Then on Wednesday, a post appeared on the Post's Wonkblog comparing the Amazon / Hachette fight to the debate over net neutrality: «Wanting to give consumers access to its products through the biggest single pipeline available, Hachette may relent on the
price at which it
sells books to Amazon, squeezing its slim profit margins even
further.»
A
further point others have pointed out is that while book publishers have to
sell remainders
at deep discounts, the
price of an e-book doesn't go down with age, as there is no need to get an e-book out of inventory.
It looks a lot like Apple's iPad Mini (complete with the placement of the camera, buttons, and headphone jack), but will
sell at a
far more attractive $ 249
price - point.
While the
price point is pretty impressive it's
far more impressive that Amazon have managed to take a product that was
sold between February and November of 2009, refurbished the ones that were returned, and have enough to be
selling them
at a super low
price point for quite a few days.
So all those who were working off the 2010 wisdom of
pricing their work
at.99 cents are now relegated to a bin where they will have
far less chance than ever (I won't debate whether a novel should
sell for.99 — you better than I know what your work is worth).
With the exception how romance usually benefits from the sweet deals, Lindsay
further explains how authors have put their first few books in a series on a heavy discount when those titles are normally
priced at $ 2.99 or $ 4.99 if
sold individually.
In which case, there's no reason to
sell «razors»
at all, especially since Android Tablets will be made out of commodity parts, will use cheap LCD display technology and will be
far more capable, and many will be
priced in the $ 200 - $ 300 range and well within striking distance of the current
price of dedicated e-readers.
UPDATE: The Washington Post covers the story on Wednesday, May 14, noting that Hachette may be forced to «relent on the
price at which it
sells books to Amazon, squeezing its slim profit margins even
further» and that, as Amazon's market share increases, «if there's no real choice of where to buy things, maybe there should be some other way to retain
pricing power for those who produce goods in the first place.»
The reality is — and Amazon knows this and is lying about it — that publishers
sell and are
far more likely to
sell more books in total by
pricing bestselling e-books
at $ 14.99, then $ 9.99, then $ 6.49, than they would
selling the bestselling e-books only
at $ 9.99.
The article
further tries to define an analysis as to when the trend would change... ie in simple words, based on my example, if there are more buyers, then the
price would go up...
at this new
price levels there maybe more seller's willing to
sell and less buyers willing to buy... and hence
price would start going down.
That is, you can buy a protective put on the covered call, allowing you to
sell the stock
at a set
price, no matter how
far the markets drop.
Suppose
further that after ten years, the revised issue
price of the bond using the constant interest rate method is 70 (the original issue
price of 50 plus 20 points of accrued OID) and the investor
sells the bond to a second investor
at a
price of 60.
There are times when the
selling price is about
at fair value, there are times when the
selling price is
far above fair value, and there are times when the
selling price is
far below fair value.
Whether you want a strategy that helps with a reliable source of steady income or a strategy that will help you buy stock
at far cheaper
prices,
selling puts is a strategy all individual investors need to know to be truly successful.
If the
price moves higher than the previous resistance level, the trader will want to enter
at this breakout point expecting the
prices to go
further high and similarly if the
price breaks the previous support level, the trader will want to
sell at the point expecting the market to go
further low.
With the stock trading near my purchase
price of $ 79.79
at expiration, I'll look for immediate opportunities to
sell another round of covered calls in order to generate additional income and
further reduce my cost basis.
I lost money on CTCM, but
at least I
sold off the majority of my CTCM shares before the stock
price fell even
further.
However, as papy02 says above (and I think I said elsewhere), the prospect of the board
selling shares @ 32p & then buying them back (possibly, shortly thereafter)
at far higher
prices seems a mite embarrassing... It certainly seems to suggest
at least one of those decisions might be less than smart — and I certainly don't think it would be the decision to buy back shares
at an attractive discount..!
By simply valuing the profits of a Darwin's Darling
at their own market multiple, these buyers delivered a valuation to
selling shareholders that
far exceeded any share
price the company might have independently achieved.
2) With BRK and IBM, Buffett hopes that public buyers and sellers will be stupid, and
sell their shares
at levels
far below what the eventual
prices will be, allowing the remaining shareholders to do better, as management buys in shares
at a bargain, benefiting the persisting shareholders.
One of the big edges provided by VII is that the investor avoids the big portfolio losses that cause stock sales and yet the effect of
selling stocks
at low
prices (which obviously hurts the Passive Indexer
far more than it hurts the VII investor) is assumed out of most statistical analyses.