Not exact matches
If the Commission concludes that the country is failing to fulfil its obligations under EU law, it may
send a reasoned
opinion: a
formal request to comply with EU law.
The New York Public Interest Research Group in November
sent a letter asking for a
formal opinion from the Joint Commission on Public Ethics as to whether political parties should be considered lobbyists under state law.
It would be a far better use of most scientists and PhDs time who comment on this forum and on others like Open Mind to just STOP wasting YOUR time arguing with idiotic «drunken» deniers, and spend their time much more effectively by scouring the internet for such «events» as «Gas Fracking reviews by Government» etc etc in all nations across the world and use your education and skills and knowledge and actually make a positive difference to AGW / CC action by
sending them a
FORMAL SUBMISSION or offering up YOUR
OPINION and EXPERTISE to be considered in their deliberations.
The most prominent of these was ABA
Formal Opinion 99 - 413, which concluded that a lawyer
sending confidential client information by unencrypted email does not violate the model rules.
See Association of the Bar of the City of New York,
Formal Opinion 2001 - 1 (concluding that information submitted by e-mail to a law firm via the firm's website was unsolicited; simply including an e-mail link on a law firm's website does not amount to an invitation to transmit confidential information); Iowa State Bar Association Op. 07 - 02 (evaluated whether the lawyer said or did anything to prompt the potential client to provide confidential information to the lawyer, noting that a lawyer's «request to contact» is not the same as a request for information); Massachusetts Bar Association Op. 07 - 01 (concluding that a website is a marketing tool by which a prospective client may identify which lawyers have the expertise necessary to handle a particular case, and that the publication of such information could reasonably lead a prospective client to conclude that, when
sending information to the firm via an e-mail link, the firm and its lawyers have implicitly «agreed to consider» whether to form an attorney - client relationship.
ABA
Formal Opinion 1 - 459 tells us that A lawyer
sending or receiving substantive communications with a client via e-mail or other electronic means ordinarily must warn the client about the risk of
sending or receiving electronic communications using a computer or other device, or e-mail account, where there is a significant risk that a third party may gain access.
Formal Client Feedback Program — These structured programs
send a clear signal to clients surveyed that their firm cares enough to ask their
opinion but can be laborious to administer and need buy - in from the relationship partners involved.