Sentences with phrase «senior federal court judge»
At the AAT hearing in Adelaide, the impacts of wind farm noise were considered by a senior Federal Court judge; the most thorough medial and scientific inquiry on the subject matter conducted in Australia to date.
http://www.windconcernsontario.ca/ Not exact matches
For example, in case number 87 C 10746, Gutzmacher v. Public Building Commission, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District ofIllinois, Eastern Division, Senior Federal District Judge James B. Parson ruled on Dec. 4, 1989 that the Public Building Commission was enjoined from discriminating against all forms of religious expression and ordered the Public Building Commission to permit Gutzmacher to erect a nativity scene display during the Christmas season,» added Scholten.
Meanwhile, on Tuesday, in a federal district court in Washington, D.C., the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Center for Constitutional Rights filed a brief requesting that a federal judge not dismiss a case of litigation against senior CIA and military officials for the 2011 targeted killing of Anwar al - Awlaki (a suspected al - Qaeda leader) and his 16 - year - old son, both U.S. citizens.
Again, A Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr. Joe Agi, who is being prosecuted along with Justice Ademola of a Federal High Court, had told the Department of the State Service that Buhari's lawyer paid N500, 000 to Justice Ademola in 2015 at the time the judge was presiding over Buhari's certificate case.
At the hearing in the matter, Friday, MTN's counsel, Chief Wole Olanipekun, SAN, led a team of MTN lawyers made up of 10 senior advocates, told the presiding judge, Mohammed Idris, on Friday at the federal high court, Ikoyi, Lagos, that MTN has opted to settle out of court.
Scarborough, 69, apppeared in federal court before Senior U.S. District Judge Thomas J. McAvoy, admitting crimes involving a program receiving federal tax dollars.
Bruce M. Selya is a senior federal judge on the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit and has enjoyed a celebrated law career.
Those of us who practice within the federal courts» first judicial circuit have long had a crapulous craving for the tenebrous pearls of linguistic perlustration emanating over the years from the opinions of now - senior 1st Circuit Judge Bruce M. Selya.
«A Deep Bench»: Today in The New York Times, Senior U.S. District Judge Ann Aldrich (N.D. Ohio), along with her judicial law clerks, Alex Frondorf and Richard J. Hawkins, have an op - ed that begins, «To succeed Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, President Obama should select a nominee with experience that no other sitting justice has — service as a trial judge on a federal district court.&rJudge Ann Aldrich (N.D. Ohio), along with her judicial law clerks, Alex Frondorf and Richard J. Hawkins, have an op - ed that begins, «To succeed Justice David Souter on the Supreme Court, President Obama should select a nominee with experience that no other sitting justice has — service as a trial judge on a federal district court.&rCourt, President Obama should select a nominee with experience that no other sitting justice has — service as a trial judge on a federal district court.&rjudge on a federal district court.&rcourt.»
The CJC's 39 members are the chief justices, associate chief justices, and senior judges from provincial and federal superior courts across Canada.
Prominently featured in the LTN piece was Senior U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf, who last February launched the blog Hercules and the Umpire and quickly found notoriety when he published a post in which he declared, «A lot of what the Supreme Court does is simply irrelevant to what federal trial judges do on a daily basis.»
But, here, two of the Second Circuit's active judges ruled against Marblegate, the dissent was by a senior judge who can not vote on an en banc petition, and the Second Circuit has historically granted fewer en banc rehearings than any other circuit court.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not anacourt.5 Other avenues could include Marblegate filing a petition for a writ of certiorari with the US Supreme Court and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not anaCourt and / or pursuing other federal or state law remedies, including state law theories of successor liability or fraudulent conveyance against the new EDMC subsidiary, theories that the Second Circuit noted as potential causes of action but did not analyze.
Faculty The Honorable Avern L. Cohn, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan The Honorable Frank Maas, Chief Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Eastern District of Michigan The Honorable Frank Maas, Chief Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Southern District of New York The Honorable Lisa M. Smith, Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Southern District of New York Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal courtcourt.
Faculty The Honorable Milton I. Shadur, Senior Judge, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois The Honorable William G. Young, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the Northern District of Illinois The Honorable William G. Young, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the District of Massachusetts The Honorable Victor A. Bolden, District Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal cCourt for the District of Connecticut Course Description A panel of sitting federal judges address a range of issues in awarding attorney fees and expenses in large, complex litigation in federal courtcourt.
Judges of the senior court, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, are appointed by the federal Cabcourt, the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia, are appointed by the federal CabCourt of Nova Scotia, are appointed by the federal Cabinet.
Council membership consists of the chief justices, associate chief justices, and some senior judges from provincial and federal superior courts across the country.
A conversation with Judge Richard A. Posner of the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals (and senior lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School)-- one of the most provocative voices of both the modern federal judiciary and legal academia.