I suspect this article didn't receive the same attention because it doesn't facilitate
sensational headlines like «Coke Zero Makes You Fat.»
Multivitamins are all over the news with
sensational headlines like «Multivitamin Researchers Say Case Is Closed, Supplements Don't Boost Health.»
Not exact matches
But since mainstream news outlets are already mischaracterizing the data with eye - ball catching
headlines like «Your lifetime earnings are probably determined in your 20s,» I thought I'd provide some advice that's a bit less
sensational and a lot more balanced:
The surprise to me with this lawsuit is that it doesn't feature
sensational evidence
like others did — the older Kivalina v Exxon case and the newer San Mateo / Marin / Imperial Beach v. Chevron cases — by citing the infamous «leaked memo set»
headlined with «reposition global warming as theory rather than fact,» which are universally accepted among enviro - activists as smoking gun evidence of skeptic climate scientists being paid to push misinformation to the public at the behest of sinister corporate handlers.