The idea that dry food promotes dental health makes about as much
sense as the idea that crunchy cookies would promote dental health in a human.
Not exact matches
And
as Lunar's designers are freed to develop some of their own
ideas into real, market - meeting products, Lunar will develop an identity founded on a greater
sense of authorship.
«We believe Starbucks is an actionable
idea here,
as we
sense the stress the Company felt over December, and into January, results has passed and that operational and sales initiatives are in place to allow a return to 3 % comps in 2H18 and beyond,» analyst John Ivankoe wrote in a note to clients Monday.
But if you think of selling
as explaining the logic and benefits of a decision, then everyone — business owner or not — needs sales skills: to convince others that an
idea makes
sense, to show bosses or investors how a project or business will generate a return, to help employees understand the benefits of a new process, etc..
In particular, Boatright says the stakeholder
idea should only be held up
as an ideal, a source of a
sense of mission, a motivator reminding corporate insiders that all participants need to find long - term benefit.
Gen Z is the first generation to grow up in an economy where the
idea of becoming a social media influencer makes just
as much
sense as going to school and getting a business degree.
But its most fervent proponents are so desperate to maintain the illusion that they represent an oppressed majority (
as if that makes any
sense) that they've created copious fake accounts to artificially inflate the size of the movement, and even designed a cartoon female mascot named Vivian James to advance the
idea that #notallwomen care about female representation in games.
There are some circumstances where a Roth conversion still might make
sense, such
as during a period of prolonged unemployment, but for those who are confident they'll be leaving their state when they retire, the vast majority of the time, a Roth conversion is simply a bad
idea.
Ideas around the non-monetary aspects of employment in providing a self - image for people, giving them standing in the community, a
sense of personal worth, a role
as family provider, a network of peers, and way of life are not part of the economics curriculum, so can be assumed not to matter.
* Speaking of autopay, it's a good
idea to get it set up
as soon
as makes
sense for your budget,
as you'll receive a 0.25 percent interest rate reduction for any Direct Loans you're repaying.
As one of the most successful investors in history, it makes
sense to explore the principles and
ideas he used to achieve his wealth.
The
idea behind this theory is that,
as big investors
sense that smaller - cap, higher - beta stocks have reached a point of overvaluation and high risk, these investors move money from the overvalued stocks into the Dow stocks, which are traditionally considered more stable and more liquid.
Using «adult»
as C.S. Lewis described it, a term of approval, can beget the
idea that adulthood carries a
sense of gravitas lacked by childhood.
But
as that gap has narrowed and disappeared with the commodification of culture and our loss of a
sense of the holy, art must become the void itself in order to re-establish the very
idea of the sacred.
Makes more
sense to me than to try to believe God plopped Adam and Eve down, and then told them not to eat that one fruit, lest they die —
as if they would have had any
idea what death was (did your toddler understand «burn» before he got his first one?).
They should have faith that they have the better
ideas as to both politics and policy, and that Republican primary voters will have the
sense to see this.
That's an indoctrinated belief placed upon a natural human reaction, just
as much
as the Hindu
idea that good deeds only make
sense in the context of people trying to improve themselves through reincarnation, isn't it?
From a common
sense perspective, I would say that the
idea that sea life evolved into mammalian and other land dwelling life is just
as miraculous
as god creating distinct life is.
And so you must open all your
senses,
as it were» for, «In the last analysis,» writes Gadamer, «Goethe's statement «Everything is a symbol» is the most comprehensive formulation of the hermeneutical
idea.»
Probably no one really believes that God is «omnipotent» in this
sense, but the
idea can reappear
as an excuse for inaction in the face of evil.
«If the word «random» necessarily entails the
idea that some events are «unguided» in the
sense of falling «outside the bounds of divine providence,» we should have to condemn
as incompatible with Christian faith a great deal of modern physics, chemistry, geology, and astronomy,
as well
as biology,» he wrote.
At the other extreme are theologies that take the best of contemporary thought
as normative and then explain what
sense can be made of basic biblical
ideas in this context.
Hebrew thought developed this
idea rather than immortality, first, because the Hebrews had a vivid
sense of the goodness of material bodily existence; and second, because they understood the necessary unity of the person not
as a soul - in - body but
as a whole living, feeling, thinking personality.
Yet in the broad
sense in which education means the shaping of
ideas and ideals, it never ends
as long
as any mental flexibility remains.
Holding to evolution
as the origin of the world and all that is therein makes good philosophical
sense if and only if you reject the
idea of a God... or even of gods.
This
idea is so emphatic in the Gospels that it can easily be interpreted
as individualistic in a narrow and imprisoning
sense.
We too know Christ
as Master and Savior and Lord, though we may no longer use some of the terms which the early Christians used, or though we may use them in a somewhat different
sense, inasmuch
as the
ideas originally conveyed by them are no longer familiar and natural.
If something so important for each individual is dependent upon accepting / rejecting a supposed scriptural «truth» (
as you define it) then make the case for how it makes any
sense at all that humans would be judged negatively for rejecting something they have no
idea exists!!
Yet through all these diversities of phrasing — whether faith was thought of
as a power - releasing confidence in God, or
as selfcommitment to Christ that brought the divine Spirit into indwelling control of one's life, or
as the power by which we apprehend the eternal and invisible even while living in the world of
sense, or
as the climactic vision of Christ
as the Son of God which crowns our surrender to his attractiveness, or
as assured conviction concerning great truths that underlie and constitute the gospel — always the enlargement and enrichment of faith was opening new meanings in the experience of fellowship with God and was influencing deeply both the
idea and the practice of prayer.
We are hopefully free from the illusion that there can be a «biblical theology» in the
sense that all the themes and
ideas present in the Bible can be brought to a harmonious unity, which can then be reaffirmed
as true Christian theology.
Perhaps this
idea is ambiguous, perhaps there is a
sense in which God should be conceived
as perfect, another
sense in which perfection can not apply to God, because (it may be) this
sense involves an absurdity or, in other words, is really nonsense.
Jesus expresses no conception of a human ideal, no thought of a development of human capacities, no
idea of something valuable in man
as such, no conception of the spirit in the modern
sense.
In his book The Neoconservatives (1979), Peter Steinfels described those on our side of the barricades
as «counterintellectuals,» people who move in the intellectual world but who do not share that world's dominant
sense of alienation and estrangement from the
ideas, values, and institutions of the middle - American majority.
I can see how one can look at this
idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11
as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but
as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith
as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more
sense to understand Hebrews 11:1
as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.
The
idea of progress comes out of the
sense of imperfection,
as does the
idea of God
as transcendent.
Those regularly involved with
ideas who regard themselves
as without ideology, without some general pattern (s) of analysis out of which they make
sense of experience, need either to think more deeply or — more likely — to stop fooling themselves.
And what
ideas do you hold, in a positive
sense,
as opposed «not» hold?
A fact may be defined
as something that occurred in reality, but at the solipsist state you can't talk of any reality beyond your own conscience, so the way you made yourself ready to dismiss solipsism
as a philosophical
idea, not a fact, simply doesn't make any
sense.
We could then suppose that when Whitehead developed the
idea of the consequent nature in the narrow
sense, he created the «primordial nature»
as a contrasting term This hypothesis would make
sense of the present text of PR without supposing that Whitehead began working on the Gifford Lectures only with a noninteractive God little different from the abstract principle of concretion of SMW» (PS 15: 200).
Prayer but a shortened version of meditation that having come over the many centuries /
as the art of true prayer in meditation was lost / where the focus of reality had turned to the external based on
ideas belief / rather than practical spiritual experience of one turning the
senses inward / thus knowing / not believing.
The notion of truth
as «correspondence of (interpretative)
idea to (preinterpreted, given) reality» therefore makes no
sense.
The Christian theologian therefore properly takes this belief
as one of the «facts» to which a theological position should be adequate, even if it is not a fact in
as strong a
sense as hard - core commonsense
ideas and very well - grounded scientific and historical
ideas.
If that child were to die, then at that point the
idea of karma might be introduced to try to ease the
sense of loss, just
as someone in the West might say «the child was spared further suffering».
In the book, I argue that it makes
sense that if there's a God who loves and there's a God who created sex — which is an interesting
idea in of itself — that what God has to say about this topic is important, and common
sense actually supports the New Testament
as it relates to sex.
Here are three typical answers: «He is
as much a necessity to my spiritual existence as the elements of pure air are to my physical system»; «If I were convinced that there is no God, I fear a sense of loneliness would become intolerable»; «As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the idea of God.&raqu
as much a necessity to my spiritual existence
as the elements of pure air are to my physical system»; «If I were convinced that there is no God, I fear a sense of loneliness would become intolerable»; «As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the idea of God.&raqu
as the elements of pure air are to my physical system»; «If I were convinced that there is no God, I fear a
sense of loneliness would become intolerable»; «
As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the idea of God.&raqu
As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the
idea of God.»
In the same and in other schools uncertainty about the meaning of the ministry comes to appearance also in the feeling of conflict in a faculty between its loyalty to a traditional
idea, such
as that of the preacher, and its
sense of obligation to denominational officials, alumni and churchmen in general who urge a more «practical» education.
It is clear from what has been said that the
idea of «being chosen» is in reality a general religious principle, applicable to individuals
as well
as to groups, and in an analogous
sense has relevance to all levels in the order of nature.
He is, rather, a very complex structured society which sustains, among many other societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate society (an enduring object) which Whitehead refers to
as «the soul of which Plato spoke» (Adventures of
Ideas 267 — see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement of the distinction between «the ordinary meaning of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the narrow
sense of «man,» where «man» is considered a person in Whitehead's technical
sense, i.e.,
as the regnant, personally ordered society which he identifies
as his equivalent of Descartes» thinking substance and Plato's soul).
Smith's translation of Buber's «Umkehr»
as «reversal» does not adequately convey the
idea of the Hebrew teshuvah, man's wholehearted turning to God, and it is in this
sense that Buber has used «Umkehr» in earlier works («Die Erneuerung des Judentums,» «Zwiefache Zukunft.»
Mike, not me has just used your abhorrence at the
idea of carrying out an act that his god specifically commands
as an argument that you have instilled in you an objective
sense of right and wrong... of which that same god is the source.