Curriculum - based learning makes
sense for teaching reading, writing, and math.
Not exact matches
'' I have no idea what Bell is trying to prove; but the lost of income» — it doesn't make a lot of
sense for a man of no faith to
teach at; Christian schools... «his wife» — not related,
read the story... «and potentially his home» - once again, related to his jobs at Christian schools.
And
for those going into the secondary
teaching, or who'd just like to get a
sense of how American teenagers really are when asked about serious things, I'm sure the book he wrote based upon his years of
teaching, Meetings at the Metaphor Café, is very much worth
reading.
but if enough real food advocates step up and say «does it really make
sense to serve candy and soda at an elementary school function» or «can we encourage parents to send non-food treats
for bday celebrations» or better yet, «can you do what you do best and help my child learn to like fresh produce just like you
taught him to
read?»
The issue with that is that if we have students in a classroom who are ranging from below Low, barely able to
read and make
sense of their text, to students who are
reading at this Advanced level, it is very difficult
for a teacher to be able to
teach to a class with that wide a variety of literacy levels, and the problem is that these children who are not reaching the Low benchmark or are at the Low benchmark are, if you like, starting the race quite a long way behind all of these other kids.
Though educators and the public will never agree on precisely what «citizen competence» demands of schooling, the best strategies
for teaching reading, or the most appropriate curriculum
for cultivating critical thinking or a
sense of justice, most will agree that schools that
teach or practice racism, deny boys and girls equal opportunities, or neglect mathematics do not merit public support.