Not exact matches
a set of values, beliefs, and structure in a person's life in order to give them direction and a
sense of
right and wrong
is fine, but organized religions
are no more than large corporations, and like any large corporation
are only focused
on their bottom line... trying to control the public and extract as much
money as they can from them by any means necessary... promoting fear, uncertainty, hate and a
sense that they alone can offer salvation... for a price (although they
are very cleaver about getting to this hidden and unspoken cost... after all these hundreds of years they have perfected their craft well!)
I don't think it
's so much about the levites
being paid for their service it
's about us doing what
's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers
are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it
's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have
been ashamed of taking
money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they
was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain
was GOD talking about oxes no he
was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it
's just spiritual
sense to support a pastor that
's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing
is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't
be paid for their service either don't know they need to
be paid and need to
be taught or they
are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It
's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE
is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience
on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would
be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we
are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would
be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual
sense because hate and a carnal
senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond
right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
And you
're right about holding
on to him too, when a massive club does come calling, A - Will he just piss off and leave and B - Would we recuperate the ginormous amount of
money that we paid for him??? I don't think that it makes
sense for our club to go in for him at # 125 million.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands,
is in no better position to compete next season than they
were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have
been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs
on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he
's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father
were a little too involved
on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders
on our current roster there
are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough
was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings
are indicative of what
's wrong with this club and it
's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed
on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building
on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to
be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger
's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to
be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he
was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence
on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil
were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract
is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find
money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it
's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value
is just to simply
right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time
on the training table as
on the field of play, which would
be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who
is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will
be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam
being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry
's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP,
was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to
be brought
on board and that wasn't possible when the business model
was that of a «selling» club... does it really make
sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he
was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who
were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger
on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and
were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who
were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it
was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really
was...
Should stop worrying about left back and bring in quality attacking option... If isco
is available should get him Sanchez giroud / welbeck isco ozil should
be ok to keep us there or thereabouts... With Campbell as back up... ox
on loan Walcott sold to some Middle East team with more
money than
sense... Or test Bilbao
on the Williams kid suspect they might take 25 even with his buy out clause upped... need something... We
r 2 points above spurs
right now with a much poorer goal difference
Pre-Campaign Community Service / Activism: Worked extensively with Family of Woodstock, Rip Van Winkle Council of Boy Scouts of America, establishing Ulster County Habitat for Humanity, Ralph Darmstadt Homeless Shelter, Ulster County Board of Health and Ulster County Human
Rights Commission, Caring Hands Soup Kitchen Board Member, Midtown Rising Board Member, Teacher at Woodbourne Prison, part of Rising Hope Program Platform At a Glance Economy: Supports farming subsidies, job creation through infrastructure investments in rural broadband and sustainable technology, in favor of strong unions Healthcare: Medicare for All Women's
Rights: Pro-choice, supports fully funding Planned Parenthood, birth control to
be paid for employer, supports equal pay for equal work Racial Justice: Will work to prevent discrimination of all kind Immigration: Supports comprehensive immigration reform that includes path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants Foreign Policy: Supports increased pressure
on North Korea but not military intervention Environment: Supports measures to stall climate change and create green jobs LGBTQ: Supports anti-discrimination of all people Gun Control: Will not take NRA
money, supports common
sense gun control and against Faso's vote to allow the mentally disabled to obtain firearms
I guess
right now I'd have to say I
am working towards my business actually making a little bit of
money so I don't fee like I
'm a drain
on family finances — does that make
sense?
Saoirse Ronan says she has a «good
sense» of what roles
are right for her and won't always go for the movies that pay the most
money but instead she chooses projects based
on what
is right for her.
One gets a
sense of how long she may have planned the escape she eventually took in the beginning of the film: waiting to save enough
money to
be able to run, waiting for the
right time when the man in her life wasn't home, waiting to have a safe destination
on the other end of her escape.
Considering that I parked the whole $ 3500 in a
Money Market fund (due to my thought that there
's too much market risk
right now), does it make
sense for me to redeem the $ 3500 and put it
on my mortgage (5.1 % rate)?
Whether cuLearn
is right for you will depend
on your personal financial situation, but it might make
sense to at least apply to see if you qualify to borrow from a credit union since you could potentially save a significant amount of
money in interest if you can get an offer with a low interest rate.
ON LAW AND LIFE JUSTICE ELEANORE A. CRONK: One of the reasons I went into law was not just because of the father who wanted to be a trial lawyer, it was because of the mother who was very accomplished in her own right, but believed strongly in women being autonomous, having an independent source of money, not being dependent on the men in their lives for their financial security, for having something that would give them a sense of self - worth that was very personal, and that was encouraged in the family environment that I lived in and grew up i
ON LAW AND LIFE JUSTICE ELEANORE A. CRONK: One of the reasons I went into law
was not just because of the father who wanted to
be a trial lawyer, it
was because of the mother who
was very accomplished in her own
right, but believed strongly in women
being autonomous, having an independent source of
money, not
being dependent
on the men in their lives for their financial security, for having something that would give them a sense of self - worth that was very personal, and that was encouraged in the family environment that I lived in and grew up i
on the men in their lives for their financial security, for having something that would give them a
sense of self - worth that
was very personal, and that
was encouraged in the family environment that I lived in and grew up in.
It makes
sense on the surface; after all, if you
're putting
money into something, you want to
be able to eventually have it for yourself and do what you want with it,
right?