There's no undisputed example of unlawful tampering with the electoral process actually changing the result of a Presidential election, in
the sense of a criminal conviction where the crime committed changed the result.
If an Internet dating service conducts
criminal background screenings, then the service shall disclose whether it has a policy allowing a member who has been identified as having a
criminal conviction to have access to its service to communicate with any New Jersey member; shall state that
criminal background screenings aren't foolproof; that they may give members a false
sense of security; that they aren't a perfect safety solution; that
criminals may circumvent even the most sophisticated search technology; that not all
criminal records are public in all states and not all databases are up to date; that only publicly available
convictions are included in the screening; and that screenings don't cover other types
of convictions or arrests or any
convictions from foreign countries.
They may also be looking for a history
of financial trouble, judgments against you, evictions or
criminal charges, or
convictions so they can get a
sense of the type
of person you are.