Sentences with phrase «sense of seeing things»

«To have someone like her - or other people who have a good sense of seeing things - have respect for what I do, it feels that Im on the right track,» the artist remarked... «For me, expression is not important.

Not exact matches

This sort of helps see it, not quite to scale, but it gives you a better sense for where things are.

«We're not going to see a complete redo of Dodd - Frank, nor should we... We're going to see some sensible, pragmatic common - sense changes to eight years of regulation... Things won't happen in a dramatic way, but it will definitely happen.»

«The idea of taking the actual account number out of the flow... common sense says that's a good thing, especially in the light of the data compromises that we've seen,» said Visa CEO Charles Scharf at a payments conference last month.

As process oriented as the new CEOs are, you get the sense that one of the things they don't love and aren't driving are the products (go look at the Apple Watch announcements and see who demos the product).

(Nest was recently acquired by Google for $ 3.2 billion, which gives a sense of the potential the software giant sees in the Internet of things.)

However, she adds, «there is of course a piece of the Mozilla project where I have a very strong sense of the possibilities and a determination to see things proceed in a way that makes sense to me.

One of the most rewarding things is seeing clients feel such a tremendous sense of relief when they realize it is not «them against the world».

Last year I wrote on Suven Life Sciences, also I did some secondary level maths to get a sense of returns an investor could get buying the business at then market cap (~ 2000 INR Crores or 400 Million USD) and exiting in 2024 See Snap shot below The base case CAGR didn't excite but reading management commentary compelled me to take a tracking position in model portfolio Over to this year One thing in AR gave me a Jeff Bezos moment For the first time management was sounding optimistic (this is coming from a management which is very conservative on record) Emphasis mine Management views on past Despite having grown the business every single year across the last five years, our business sustainability has been consistently questioned.

The Hebrew word, hebel («vanity»), has the sense of «emptiness, futility, absurdity»: «I have seen all things that are done under the sun, and behold, all is vanity and a chase after wind» (1:14; 2:11, 17, 26; etc.).

But underneath it all is a small, almost imperceptable current of life, and a promise of things so wonderful, we can not even comprehend them.I've seen it and sensed it, and tasted it, even if only for sporadic fleeting moments.

Can say that I believe in every thing that you disbelief of when it comes to the Creator and the Creation of universe, life and guidance, God has given me hearing, seeing, thinking and heart feelings to see and experience signs and small miracles to have faith in him and continue with good deeds I was told of in his Holy Book although am not perfect at that but nothing to lose but contrary to that there are more to gain in life and life after... For those disbelievers they lose their senses by being locked and blocked from such experiences... It is all about souls as verses speak for them selves;

By what we see around us in the creation, for our Creator, made us to see in color, not just black and white, to have a series of senses that allow us to thoroughly enjoy life, such as the capacity to feel very minute things with our fingertips.

It is its movement in the deepest sense for it is precisely seeing near things with their extensions of meaning and seeing far things close up which allows Tarwater to reject Rayber's secularism and to embrace the call of the Lord.

To grant that Paul's use of «flesh» as the seat of sin was colored by contemporary Hellenism, however, is one thing, and to see Paul as in any important sense a Hellenist is quite another.

I can see the point of this and I think the point is well put in the piece concerning the integration of matter to spirit in a unity where neither absorbs the other — in a sense, this is the structural openness to higher unity that characterises all created things in the Unity - Law.

We can see the sense of this intuitively — for the most surprising thing about existence is that there is anything.

While that sort of thing is encouraging for some of us to hear, really they too need to go to the scripture to see what the witness is and whether the instruction makes sense.

I can see how one can look at this idea and look at the following examples in Hebrews 11 as «Because they were sure they would get this reward, they did this thing» but as the author points out in verse 39 that they didn't get what they imagined they would, so if we understand faith as «being sure» it would turn out that it is «being sure» of something and being totally wrong — instead it makes more sense to understand Hebrews 11:1 as saying that «faith is a realization (or actualization)» of our hopes, a realization that the author points out is greater than we could expect and be sure in.

I mention, only because my... paradigm (I'm not much on beliefs, in the usual organized religion sense)... includes a «Divine» of my own definition, that equates to something like «awe of life, love, and knowing that there is much we don't know» (< — sorry, not the easiest thing for me to get into words, hopefully that gets the gist of it) that I don't see as a «personal other», but, in my paradigm, I see that Divine as being systemic to everything, hence insights from what I learn / experience can be termed as the Divine acting.

It is statements like yours that scare me the most because not only does it attribute bad deeds to outside forces, detaching humanity from its own actions, but it gives those who can «detect» the demons a mistaken sense of dominion over all others too «blinded» to see things your way, and countless followers who will not question your actions either.

And for these all things, while remaining separately the same — the ripple of water, the scent of the air, the lights in the sky — become linked together and acquire a new sense: the fixed and random Universe is seen to move.

One thing Atheist have in common with God, we enjoy seeing Christians» head spin trying to make sense of the Bible.

Suppose that on a dark night you see the beam from a searchlight, or a lighthouse, moving about the sky, or sweeping over the sea; the beam in some sense preserves its identity and yet you do not think of its being a «thing.»

O when one beholds a man who protests that he has entirely understood how Christ went about in the form of a lowly servant, poor, despised, and, as the Scripture says, spat upon — when I see the same man so careful to betake himself thither where in a worldly sense it is good to be, and accommodate himself there in the utmost security, when I see him apprehensive of every puff of wind from right or left, as though his life depended upon it, and so blissful, so utterly blissful, so awfully glad — yes, to make the thing complete, so awfully glad that he is able to thank God for it — glad that he is held in honor by all men — then I have often said to myself and by myself, «Socrates, Socrates, Socrates, can it be possible that this man has understood what he says he has understood?»

Godly Repentence is a God given thing that only happens when the Spirit of God brings a person to his senses about his sin and he sees it like God sees it.

Taken in this second sense, the hermeneutic structure of testimony consists in that testimony concerning things seen only reaches judgment through a story, that is, by means of things said.

Our thinking, at times even our senses, can play most callous tricks on us, so that we are positive of having seen or heard things that in reality never occurred.

And if we have good reason to trust Him, then when we see things that seem to go against our sense of goodness and justice, it seems only fair to give the benefit of the doubt to God, who just might know something more than we know.

In that sense I'd see thing a little differently to your view of religion being a «don't doubt» system.

It actually has to do with how we view humanity — do we see it as a bunch of individuals, or do we see a connection between all humans and understand things in a more - collective sense, a collective «personality» if you will (c.f. Jung's Collective Unconscious)?

Make it make sense so that someone who sees the pain and evil in the world will understand God's burden of responsibility for setting this whole thing in motion.

Church leaders must help the church discover and articulate a sense of peoplehood, to see, touch, taste and feel the things we take for granted.

lol, yes clay i am an atheist... i created the sun whorshipping thing to have argument against religion from a religious stand point... however, the sun makes more sense then something you can't see or feel — the sun also gives free energy... your god once did that for the jews, my gives it to the human race as well as everything else on the planet, fuk even the planet is nothing without the sun... but back to your point — yes it is very hypocritical of me, AND thats the point, every religious person i have ever met has and on a constant basis broken the tenets of there faith without regard for there souls — it seems to only be the person's conscience that dictates what is right and wrong... the belief in a god figure is just because its tradition to and plus every else believes so its always to be part of the group instead of an outsider — that is sadly human nature to be part of the group.

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

The analysis of «things» into «societies» of more ultimate units can be considered as his thoroughgoing attempt to push on toward natural entities in Aristotle's sense — even where Aristotle on the basis of bare perception could, despite his principles, see only a more or less amorphous, passive «matter.»

That kind of thinking maybe is not a very good thing; but, you see, life still makes sense whether she's right or wrong.

In another lecture we shall see how in morbid melancholy this sense of the unreality of things may become a carking pain, and even lead to suicide.

It's the first effect of not believing in Cot that you lose your common sense and can't see things as they are.

On and on will go the questions, just of the things in Creation that we can't see with our limited sense of sight.

You see it in obvious things: the loss of the sense of chivalry, of male strength placed at the service of the family and the community, and the rise of a massive gang - culture.

Being certain of things you hope for is an arrogant position with regards to the unknown, being certain of the what you can't see (or otherwise tangibly sense) set's the bar of knowledge too low.

«We've seen God working through the whole thing, one exciting thing is that it's not just through what we're doing as churches but the new sense of confidence that the city has got.»

«We recognise that just as all truth rests in the Word of God, through whom all things were made and through Whom all thing will come to their completion, so too the construction of a true human ecology can only be achieved in relationship to the Word -LSB-...] we can see and sense the echoing of that eternally spoken Word in so much of the created world around us -LSB-... which Word is] expressed in all those actions and events which make up the history of salvation -LSB-...] we recognise most centrally that this eternal Word of God, in whom all things makes sense, finds flesh in the person of Jesus of Nazareth who then becomes its fullest expression and true presence in the world -LSB-...] the centre of true human ecology is the person of Christ.»

i like the theologian Barth who felt the Parousia was a revelation of what already is... not something new... but the way things are seen for what they are... and that's heaven... that makes sense to me.

I just couldn't square all the «just believe» and «faith is believing in things you can't see, touch, taste, hear, smell, or rationally make sense of...» crap in my head.

Suddenly he saw «into the life of things» and at that moment gained a sense of all of nature being alive and expressing feelings.

There's basically no sense in allowing a player leave for free.The disgraceful thing is he's our best player and you're letting him go for free.PSG have also given us the chance to include Lucas Moura / Blaise Matuidi in the deal.Why not take Matuidi and run.Then go all out to find his replacement before the season starts.I just don't see sense in keeping him.Common sense tells us that he should be sold.You're not granted the title with or without him and just so you know, teams have won the EPL with wingers who are not better than Sanchez.Arsene should be smart before it's too late.I said weeks ago that if he knows in his heart that he's going to sell he had better do it quickly before teams start placing mammoth prices on their players as they'll know that desperation of suitors grows towards the end of the window.

Let's face it goalkeepers tend to march to the beat of a different drum and Szczesny certainly fell into that category, but most of his antics were relatively harmless and simply reflected a certain level of immaturity that isn't uncommon for someone thrust into the limelight at such a young age... lord knows we've seen that happen with numerous players throughout the years and very few were ever banished for such behaviour... the only on - field action that drove me crazy was his inability to take a deep breath and not try to rush the play with an ill - timed throw at certain points in the game when common sense suggested holding the ball and slowing things down... the fact that he continued to do this probably had a lot to do with the glaring lack of coaching time spent with the goalkeepers... ultimately he made the fateful decision to take his frustrations out into the public sphere and paid dearly for it... in the end, his services were wanted by several of the best Italian squads, which is significant considering the historical importance placed on the defensive side of the ball in Serie A... all I know is that if someone asked me to pick the most athletically gifted goalkeeper we have had in our squad since the arrival of Wenger, without hesitation, he would be my pick and for that reason his departure is more than a little disappointing... what else is new though

Except, there's no sense throwing good money after bad, so the smartest thing to do is wait and see, and let the masses enjoy the genius of Adrian Beltre for one more season, at the very least.