Not exact matches
These are
called disruptive technologies or the next big
thing, in the
sense that existing markets or economies
of scale are disrupted by the scope
of change.
Three constant features characterize publishers: a deep
sense of entitlement («We are the news, you owe this and that to us»), a lack
of technical competence (they expect FB to come up with ready - to - use products), and, in Europe, a propensity to
call on Daddy (the government) and Mommy (Brussels) when
things go awry.»
There are a lot
of things donors are looking for: A reduction in taxes, a
sense of doing good in the community, and the satisfaction that comes from donating to causes that go against the opposing political party (so -
called «rage donating.»)
But when you get to
call them stocks and you get stock quotes daily on these pieces
of paper that bounce around put people put numbers on it and volatility and all these other
things where really it's not that meaningful, you know from one
sense if you're investing in businesses and you did a lot
of research and invested in eight different businesses with the proceeds
of your sale, people would think you're a pretty prudent guy.
A few years ago, when social media and social selling came out (sales 2.0 they
called it), there was an almost euphoric
sense that spread among the sales community because everyone suddenly hoped (and, some still hold out the hope), that the worse part
of their job was now a
thing of the past — cold
calling.
Rather, a complex set
of events constitutes what in common
sense language would be
called a person or a
thing.
It is its movement in the deepest
sense for it is precisely seeing near
things with their extensions
of meaning and seeing far
things close up which allows Tarwater to reject Rayber's secularism and to embrace the
call of the Lord.
The religious impulse
calls people from the distractions
of a random world and helps them make
sense of things.
By engaging people in the effort to understand God by focusing study
of various subject matters within the horizon
of questions about Christian congregations, a theological school may help them cultivate capacities both for what Charles Wood [2]
calls «vision,» that is, formulating comprehensive, synoptic accounts
of the Christian
thing as a whole, and what he
calls «discernment,» that is, insight into the meaning, faithfulness, and truth
of particular acts in the practice
of worship (in the broad
sense of worship that we have adopted for this discussion).
Gladys i
sense your frustration but we have a teacher who explains the word to us he is wonderful he opens the word to me all the time i listen to him because from him comes wisdom he is the most humble and gentle
of teachers and always leads us into truth.He is our friend our comforter and the one who empowers us when we are weak and he is the holy spirit and once we receive him he never leaves us.jeremiah33:
Call to me and i will answer you and show you great and mighty
things... brentnz
19)
of the Posterior Analytics, where Aristotle describes how the mind ascends to the first principles on which all science is grounded, he points out that the immediate point
of departure
of the inductive movement is not mere
sense perception, but «experience»: «So from perception there comes memory, as we
call it, and from memory (when it occurs often in connection with the same
thing), experience; for memories that are many in number form a single experience.
DH «I am in favour
of recovering the biblical understanding
of shaming in the
sense that «God chose the weak
things of the world to shame the strong» 1 cor 1:27... as an encouragement to anyone who is a victim (and therefore considered weak in the eyes
of the world) that there is a greater power to
call on in order to shame... any person in a position
of power in the church that is using their power to oppress rather than serve... Does that help or hinder?»
is the Elder Brother
of all
things created, for it was by him and in him that all
things were created, whether here on earth in the sensible world or in the world beyond the horizon
of your
senses which we
call heaven, even institutions like royal thrones, seats
of lords and rulers — all forms
of authority.
But I really don't think anyone with a
sense of charity could think I was doing EXACTLY the same
thing I was
calling up Society as doing — namely, doubting the reliability
of an aspect
of the canon.
The reason its
called Religious Tolerance is because we sometimes have to tolerate it when religions do
things we don't like, or that offend our religious
sense of right and wrong.
The only
thing that would put us in «good standing» with the ex-gay and similar folk would be to admit we are gay and always will be («reparative» therapy doesn't work and denial ends in repression taking the form
of promiscuity), and most
of us aren't
called to celibacy (in the only Biblical
sense of the term, as Jesus makes reference to and Paul discusses at length).
«So we've got a
thing called «mountain pilgrims» which is sort
of beginning to be a fresh expression
of church which is encouraging people to make a link between natural beauty and the
sense of awe and wonder which they feel at that and then a
sense of awe and wonder at the Creator who created this wonderful beauty.»
His principal message at present is about evangelisation, echoing the
call of recent popes, and giving voice to a widespread concern about a
sense of life having lost its meaning for many people «There is this reduction
of living to a general soft - core list
of things: money, health, individualism.
Amid the strife
of the Culture Wars and the heated partisan divides between Red and Blue states, one
thing seems to bring together a great many Americans across both sides
of the nation's secular / sacred divide: a deep, abiding
sense of amusement and incredulity — if not outright contempt — for purveyors and supporters
of the so -
called «Prosperity Gospel».
What makes good
sense with regard to «
things,» namely their conception as a «society»
of more fundamental Unities, is thus not
called for with regard to the more highly developed forms
of life if one does not want to run the risk
of missing from the start what is distinctive
of living
things.
1.300 - 318)
called monads, firsts, or «feeling qualities,» are omitted from the account
of things found in physics and chemistry, except for the methodological point that we detect the presence
of the various magnitudes and spatio - temporal structures by our qualitative human
sense perceptions, visual or tactual.
Consider, then, the sky and earth and the whole world as containing animals in the way in which worms are sometimes contained in the human intestines — worms or men, if you please, who ignore
sense and feeling in other
things because they consider it irrelevant with respect to their so
called knowledge
of entities.
Iâ $ ™ d
call this hope, â $ œthe certainty
of things not seen.â $ I have vision in the
sense that I believe Jesus can help me run this race, even though I donâ $ ™ t know where the course goes.
His insistence on monism was not aimed to reduce the particularity and materiality
of the world to ideal «principle» in some subjective
sense, although he did misstate his case when he
called for seeking principle within oneself instead
of in external
things.
That mankind has in this
sense been cowardly has done life endless harm; the experiences that are
called «vision,» the whole so -
called «spirit - world,» death, all those
things that are so closely akin to us, have by daily parrying been so crowded out
of life that the
senses with which we could have grasped them are atrophied.
This idea
of everything that has life sharing God's breath as it were, seems to make a lot
of sense to me and
calls us to think about the connection offered to all living
things — and the responsibility it
calls us to in caring for living
things around us.
They understand, among other
things, what they
call and take from the Reformers to be the «plain
sense of scripture.»
Whitehead does not yet want to
call into question the common
sense assumption that the world is an actual unity: «we... endeavor to imagine the world as one connected set
of things which underlies all the perceptions
of other, unrelinquishable references to the world (such as
sense perception»).
I don't think it's so much about the levites being paid for their service it's about us doing what's right toward Pastors that must feed and tend to the flock
of GOD if GOD has called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of GOD if GOD has
called them.JESUS even said in luke 10:7 that the laborers are worthy
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of their wages.In luke 8 1 - 4 it's says even JESUS HIMSELF recieved financial support from the women who ministered to him with their possessions.Now most people today would say he should have been ashamed
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these things because of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of taking money from those poor women but JESUS accepted their support and they was blessed for sowing onto the LORD»S work.1 Corinthains 9:1 - 15 says dint muzzle the ox while it tread out the grain was GOD talking about oxes no he was talking about those who labor in the ministry.Who goes to war at their own expense.Or who goes to war but pay for their clothes, guns, etc.No one because the goverment if that country provide these
things because
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the soilders service.Who plants a vineyard and don't eat from it.Who tends a flock and don't drink the milk
of it.I think it's just spiritual sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of it.I think it's just spiritual
sense to support a pastor that's teaching you the word, casting out devils, laying hands and healing is manifesting in people lived, going to hospitails, prisons, and house
calls to pray for the sick and shut in, going to graduations and funnerals, praying and fasting for himself and the flock.I think a person who think a pastor shouldn't be paid for their service either don't know they need to be paid and need to be taught or they are demonic in their thinking and either hate GOD, PASTORS, AND GOD»S PEOPLE.Why do nt you hear people saying anything against the dope dealers, strip clubs, dope houses, liquor stores, etc.It's only when people give into the LORD»S work that evil minded or misinformed people have a problem with it.No sir we don't have to use the old testament to show that we should support out pastors.You don't use the law, love tells me to support the pastor.Under the new testament LOVE is the greatest
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of all.Love for GOD and man.If GOD asked for 10 percent under the law to support the levites who didn't have all the responsibilities
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of Pastor today.Church rent, gas for vans
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of thd church, insurance fir the church and church vehicles, feeding and clothing the poor, light, gas, and water bill, mantience on the church or vehicles, not to mention the Pastor own house, cars, children, insurance, etc.If would be foolish for one to think that a pastor should take care if his house and GODS HOUSE without people supporting the work
of the KINGDOM OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
of the KINGDOM
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual sense because hate and a carnal senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLES
OF GOD.If we love GOD we are going to support HIS KINGDOM and HIS PASTOR.If under the law GOD asked for 10 percent how much should we give under the LOVE COVENANT?Example I love my wife and if I had 300 dollars I would surley give her more that 10 percent which would be 30 dollars because I love her.The law says you must give LOVE says I chose to give because I love GOD and man.Again we don't have to use the law just love and spiritual
sense because hate and a carnal
senses will not understand.Now I have given you scriptures please do the same when you respond not your opinion.Please respond right away I await your answer.GOD BLESS.
Cohen was equally forthright when, in a 1986 interview with Robert Sword, he spoke
of how we «
sense that there is a will that is behind all
things, and we're also aware
of our own will, and it's the distance between those two wills that creates the mystery that we
call religion.»
The
sense of power and control over one's life remains, however, when they also are endowed with something Antonovski (1979)
calls «lawfulness,» that is, when meaning is attributed as much to a miracle as to the absence
of one, and people believe that «
things will be how they should be.»
the only
thing of any
sense in this aeticle is the
call to move on... beginning with moving on from walcott..
In the back room, his secretary, Tracey Nguyen, answers
calls and tries to make
sense of Payton's off - season schedule, a jumble
of business meetings, workouts, charity functions, hunting and fishing trips, excursions to look at cars, and a myriad
of other
things a kid with a lot
of money might be expected to do.
Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition
of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release
of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state
of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid
of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy
of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid
of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid
of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction
of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return
of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort
of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative
of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition
of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle
of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any
of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind
of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack
of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result
of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest
of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands
of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none
of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club
of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid
of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field
of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version
of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history
of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet
of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival
of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone
of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players
of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that
of a «selling» club... does it really make
sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part
of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally
called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great
things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet
of those who were well aware all along
of the potential pitfalls
of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...
Robin Kaplan:... you know, you bring... you both bring up a very good point,
of this
sense of relaxation and that's because breastfeeding stimulates the release
of a hormone
called Oxytocin and what that is, is not only does it you know, stimulate uterine contractions, which we'll talk about in Mother's Health and
things like that, but it also promotes the development
of maternal behavior and bonding.
[1]- Ironically, many true liberals in classical liberalism
sense are currently trying to re-brand
things back, by reclaiming «liberal» label for their left - libertarian positions (one
of the most notable examples is Dave Rubin), while branding former - progressives - now -
called - «liberals» as «progressive» again, on the basis that current US progressive movement is claimed by many to be against many individual rights and the basis
of classical liberalism
«It took a lot
of confidence to actually realize that
things did not make
sense, not because the problem was difficult but because the crystals had a specific type
of... «pathology,»»
called twinning, Ban says.
Brownstein says the theory fits observations
of the so -
called Pioneer anomaly (see New Scientist feature, 13
things that do not make
sense), while MOND can not address it because Pioneer's acceleration is above a0.
A researcher from the Monell Chemical
Senses Center in Philadelphia will take part in the recreation
of Darwin's voyage and ask locals to smell 12 different
things including onions, chocolate and turpentine at some 25 ports
of call.
Curly Top could be
called the 1930s equivalent
of «Kids Say the Darndest
Things» if it had only retained some
sense of spontaneity.
Speaking
of the drugstore, I do have to give the film's detractors one
thing — it makes absolutely no
sense that this town would stock a Michael Myers (or whatever it's
called in their world) mask in their store.
It's never like nothing that makes
sense in the story, it always
calls back on
things and that was a fine example
of that I think.
It's tempting to lump this film in with the recent wave
of poignant queer masterworks, but the main
thing Call Me By Your Name shares with a Carol or Moonlight is a
sense of revelatory discovery.
Beyond just limiting priorities to what matters most, schools need to have a very clear
sense of where to start and focus their energies on what the management literature
calls «putting first
things first».
«But, I think now that we've had that initial blast and got our heads around
things, we will start to see significant moves, and I think you can start to see the steps being taken here and there by different companies to put together... and it's certainly the case with PRH as we've spent the last year and a half creating an entirely fresh team at the centre
of the business that have been looking at these questions... I'd hestitate to
call what's happened a merger because in our function it's constant renewal, in that
sense I think publishing has always been disruptive.»
I spent a lot
of time in our local library pulling out microfilm & microfiche and looking up stocks, bonds, indexes, cost
of living / govt info, real estate, etc information from ~ 1900 until (then) recent times in the wall street journal (this was pre internet — what took many weeks then now just takes a few minutes, but the Lotus 1 -2-3 spreadsheet program was very helpful in doing the analysis) and then analyzed the results and concluded that the «only» investment strategy that made any
sense was 100 % stock (absolutely the best return over time); but... there was that pesky
thing called recessions, depressions, stock market corrections etc..
Sure, there are problems and neither the RPG or RTS side
of things are particularly developed, but getting to build bases and command troops gives Spellforce 3 something missing from a lot
of so -
called «grand» RPGS; a
sense of scale.
Wonderful
things often come from the most unexpected
of places and, in this particular case, my
sense of amazement came from a short but unbelievably beautiful game
called AER: Memories
of Old.
At the same time, it's
calling the release
of Project Natal, its upcoming motion -
sensing peripheral, the biggest
thing to hit gaming and beyond.
Eventually you can piece
things together, but there are numerous rules that are simply broken at this point or that make no
sense or certain
things being
called by different names or any number
of other problems, which isn't even to mention the countless spelling errors.