As the federal government moves to limit judicial discretion in the sentencing of violent crimes, a recent decision from the British Columbia Court of Appeal has reasserted the court's authority, ruling that jurors in murder trials need not be unanimous in
their sentencing recommendation to the court.
Not exact matches
The memo, which was circulated
to prison governors on November 26th, reads: «The criminal casework directorate (CCD) of the Border and Immigration Agency have confirmed
to us that as a rule they have no interest in pursuing foreign national prisoners serving
sentences of less than 12 months for deportation unless they have a
court recommendation for deportation, are already subject
to deportation proceedings, or (in the case of non-EEA nationals) were
sentenced to less than 12 months but where the current
sentence plus one or two previous
sentences within the last five years (taking account of the most significant
sentences during the period) total 12 months or more.»
According
to Chautauqua County District Attorney David Foley, the
court has ordered a pre-sentencing investigation
to be conducted by the Department of Probation and a
sentence recommendation will come afterward.
At
sentencing, B.C. Supreme
Court Justice Elliott Myers asked the jury — as the Criminal Code requires —
to provide a
recommendation on the period of parole ineligibility (between the minimum of 10 years and maximum of 25).
For greater detail as
to how this «trial penalty» system works, see: (1) «The Triumph of Plea Bargaining,» (2011), 85 Criminal Reports (6th) 29; and, (2) «Plea Bargaining Is
Sentencing,» (2009) 14 Canadian Criminal Law Review 55, particularly this exchange of comments between a Superior Court Justice and the Crown, which clearly shows the presumptive power given the Crown's sentencing recommendations (
Sentencing,» (2009) 14 Canadian Criminal Law Review 55, particularly this exchange of comments between a Superior
Court Justice and the Crown, which clearly shows the presumptive power given the Crown's
sentencing recommendations (
sentencing recommendations (at p. 59):
The
Sentencing Commission's report presents this data without making a
recommendation as
to how the Supreme
Court should decide the issue.
Recommendation 12: The Open Justice initiative should be extended and updated so that it is possible
to view
sentences for individual offences at individual
courts, broken down by demographic characteristics, including gender and ethnicity.
This statement and the majority's discussion raises, but does not answer, the question of whether district
courts may lawfully refuse
to follow the alternative
sentencing recommendation.
Whether
sentencing is by a jury's
recommendation or by a judge after a plea or bench trial, the Virginia appellate
courts are going
to be unlikely
to disturb non-capital jail or prision
sentencing that does not exceed statutory limits.
Unlike Poundmaker, who was
sentenced to three years in the Manitoba Penitentiary, Yellow Mud Blanket was released by the
court on the
recommendation of Crown counsel; see Sandra E. Bingaman, The North - West Rebellion Trials, 1885 (MA Thesis, University of Saskatchewan [Regina], 1971)[unpublished] Appendix A at 206; see also Sandra E. Bingaman, «The Trials of Poundmaker and Big Bear, 1885» (1975) 28 Saskatchewan History 81; Blair Stonechild and W.A. Waiser, Loyal till Death: Indians and the North - West Rebellion (Saskatoon: Fifth House, 1997); Bob Beal and R.C. Macleod, Prairie Fire: The 1885 North - West Rebellion (Edmonton: Hurtig Publishers, 1984).
NEWS (4/18): In Ohio v. Mason, the Ohio Supreme
Court ruled that its capital
sentencing statute does not violate a defendant's Sixth Amendment right
to trial by jury and the U.S. Supreme
Court's 2016 decision Hurst v. Florida, which reiterated that a defendant is entitled
to a jury finding of all facts necessary
to impose a death
sentence;» [a] jury's mere
recommendation is not enough.»