Sentences with phrase «separated by doctrines»

Not exact matches

But they never fellow - shipped together, separated I guess by their doctrines, their denomination.

Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keeps one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so portends there to be...

However, the Church's theological discourse can not be so intimately bound to any one scientific theory, as «the final way» to explain something, that it becomes difficult to separate itself from such a theory, either because a theological doctrine itself can no longer be explained without it (which it can) or because a scientific theory has been superseded by a more coherent scientific theory (better able to explain reality) as is the nature of progress in science.There is a precedent for this in the Galileo controversy from the 1600s.

Toward my belief system, religion is a personal belief and should not be a sociable consideration... Anyone's beliefs upon religious conjuring séances should be held personally and not be centered by any socialism of the religiously clairvoyant which tends to conjure their weekly seminary séances upon the weakly enamored folks ever forsaking the doctrines oaths... Emotionalisms are where religious circles are deemed rented and the renters pay steeply for a yarn's worth... Therefore keep one's faith separated from religious teamsters who take and never give their folded flocks any causally rational explanations as to why there are reportedly many more of God's many sons then what Christendom so potentially claims there to be...

Atheism stands by itself and is separate, it is not a system or doctrine of beliefs, it is a non-belief.

But if this novelty did not make us think, then hope, like faith, would be a cry, a flash without a sequel; there would be no eschatology, no doctrine of last things, if the novelty of the new were not made explicit by an indefinite repetition of signs, were not verified in the «seriousness» of an interpretation which incessantly separates hope from utopia.

By an opaque concept of revelation, 1 mean that familiar amalgamation of three levels of language in one form of traditional teaching about revelation: first, the level of the confession of faith where the lex credendi is not separated from the lex orandi; second, the level of ecclesial dogma where a historic community interprets for itself and for others the understanding of faith specific to its tradition; and third, the body of doctrines imposed by the magisterium as the rule of orthodoxBy an opaque concept of revelation, 1 mean that familiar amalgamation of three levels of language in one form of traditional teaching about revelation: first, the level of the confession of faith where the lex credendi is not separated from the lex orandi; second, the level of ecclesial dogma where a historic community interprets for itself and for others the understanding of faith specific to its tradition; and third, the body of doctrines imposed by the magisterium as the rule of orthodoxby the magisterium as the rule of orthodoxy.

For another, as most of her middle - aged informants make clear, the type of father involvement allowed by the doctrine of separate spheres was too thin (and often too authoritarian) to contribute very positively to the development of children and wives, even though it underwrote men's own masculine status as breadwinners.

On May 17, 1954, the Supreme Court altered the course of American history by proclaiming in the unanimous Brown decision that «in the field of public education the doctrine of «separate but equal» has no place,» and furthermore that «separate educational facilities are inherently unequal.»

[59] The Act also replaces the criminal «continuing offence» doctrine by providing that each day on which a violation is continued constitutes a separate violation.

[3] In the «unusual circumstances» presented by the New Hampshire case, the Court used the doctrine against the State of New Hampshire, which had clearly and unequivocally argued a different interpretation of the phrase «middle of the [Piscataqua] river» in a separate 1977 consent judgment concerning border rights with Maine.

Good examples of various levels of avoidance of discussions of doctrine — regardless of one's views on the merits of the result and the separate question of the mertis of the analysis used by the SCC to reach the result — are the SCC's recent Young v. Bella, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 108, 2006 SCC 3, Childs v. Desormeaux, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 643, 2006, Jesuit Fathers of Upper Canada v. Guardian Insurance Co. of Canada, [2006] 1 S.C.R. 744, 2006 SCC 21 SCC 18 and most recently Resurfice v Hanke 2007 SCC 7.

Smith LJ also cites an article by Nigel Walker («End of an Old Song» 149 NLJ 6871, p 64) in which he argues that it is possible to regard the presumption as separate from the doctrine of doli incapax and that CDA 1998 only abolished the former.