Sentences with phrase «separation because»

Separation because of parental imprisonment also predicted the co-occurrence of internalizing and antisocial problems.

Separation because of parental imprisonment predicted boys» internalizing problems from age 14 to 48, even after controlling for childhood risk factors including parental criminality.

Add to that the fact that he abused the mother — emotionally, verbally, physically and financially throughout separation because he wouldn't leave the house.

Maggie Maybe the «non-custodial» parent wanted their child to stay in the family home and couldn't afford it, and had to stay with family after separation because there was not a lot of money.

My firm belief is that out - of - court settlement is the best process for the majority of families going through separation because it is the least destructive and holds the most promise for a dignified restructuring of their family.

So if you and your spouse can muster up the motivation and try your best to collaborate on one last project together, you might want that project to be the the marital settlement agreement for divorce or separation because it clearly is a helpful document when trying to expedite the unpredictable process that is divorce.

At a time when there have been reports of married couples considering divorces and separation because one partner wants to build the wall and one wants to deal in, how does one date and debate politics?

Tell your spouse that you want a separation because you care about her and your kids, and you want to try being apart to see how the family fares.

Whether she wants that separation because she wants to see other people, or for some other reason, the bottom line is that she wants a separation.

Many parents find that they communicate better during divorce and / or separation because it is the first time in a while that they were forced to have meaningful conversations.

Some couples choose separation because of religious values that forbid divorce.

Translated this means, dads are useful to mums after separation because they can babysit and be included on the rota for the school run.

The answer depends, said Wendi Weiner, Esq. «There needs to be a separation because otherwise it can put your authority as CEO in an uncompromising position.

In doing so, it is necessary to bear in mind that the standard of living of both households will likely suffer as a result of the separation because of the increased cost of maintaining two households on the same or nearly the same income.

September 7, A lot of people start dating during their separation because they re used having someone there.

It sounds like you're in the best possible situation for this kind of repeated separation because your husband, mother, and babysitter already share so much in her care.

I can see why some dads fade away if the relationship ends up in a divorce or separation because the moms make the fathers feel stupid or inadequate.

The discovery of new materials for separating ethylene from ethane by adsorption, instead of using cryogenic distillation, is a key milestone for molecular separations because of the multiple and widely extended uses of these molecules in industry.

Not exact matches

Believers in the technology - is - alienating - us theory are quick to point out the real separation is happening in more intimate settings, such as at home, where families aren't talking much at the dinner table because they're all on their phones.

The clients work with the firm because they wanted us because we got them and hunted them down and brought them in, that there's just the whole separation of what you guys have done.

This is why, although a limited abrogation of the physical communion of life and love is possible, the so - called «separation from bed and board,» for a Christian it is not lawful to contract a new marriage while the first spouse is alive, because the legitimately contracted bond is perpetual.

Because this feuding annoyed our key founders so greatly, they made it a top priority to establish the separation of church and state (and to make it Amendment # 1 of our Constitution).

If they originally build in some «ethical» loops, there will be controls, as well as capacity for improvement / learning, and also the instantaneous self - evolving feature will include a «port» which will connect via a network to all the others, thus producing an «equality» of sorts, and an appreciation / empathy for the «plight» of the rest, because all the lessons they all learned in the last 6 hours, (or whatever the download separation is) will be downloaded and become common to all, immediately.

Yes you should sit in the back of the political bus because that is what is meant by separation of church and state.

I had always been told that this was because of separation of church and state and this predated the Johnson thing.

Because the US doesn't have a «separation of church and chess» mandate..

Because they understood the exercise of state power to be inconsistent with the church's identity and mission, Anabaptists also advocated for the strict separation of church and state.

* My point, again, as I understand it in terms of our 1st amendment, and freedom of speech, was to (build in) a «wall» of separation of church and government... (because) of «Christianity,» since you are talking about our country, so as not to have - anyone's freedom of speech and their civil liberties trampled on.

As a proud atheist, this is a point that hits home hard for me, as I know that even a finely qualified atheist would never be elected because of the lack of separation between church and state in this nation.

We were founded on the concept of SEPARATION of Church and State, because our Founding Fathers saw the struggle between the Church of England and the Church of Rome as the terrorist state that it was.

@Clark1b: Do you really believe that the gov» t should not provide programs and assistance for the needy because it infringes on the separation of church and state?

Separation of Church and State means they can not opt out of a federal regulation because they feel it goes against their religion.

@KatMat: your analogy would begin approaching realism if: — during the pledge of allegiance kids were forced to say «one nation under The Orioles» — our nation's currency said «In Dallas Cowboys We Trust» — if millions were slaughtered, tortured and burned to death because they weren't fans of The Pittsburgh Penguins — if NASCAR fans endlessly attempted to have Intelligent Car Driving taught beside Evolution in science class as a possible explanation for how mankind developed — if «the 5 D's» of Dodgeball (Dodge, Duck, Dip, Dive, Dodge) were constantly attempted to be made into law so everyone would live by the same ridiculous notions, even if those notions knowingly discriminate — if nutters constantly claimed America was founded on the principles of Darts, even though our country SPECIFICALLY calls for a separation between Darts and State because the founders knew the inherent dangers of Darts becoming government instead of staying in the realm of sport where it belongs

that because religion permeates all aspects of life in African society, there is no separation between the sacred and the secular, the religious and non-religious, or the spiritual and the physical.

«Our family chose not to attend the ceremony this evening because we did not feel welcome at the event and we even feared for our safety in light of how hostile some of the public comments have been,» the family said in a statement released by the group Americans United for the Separation of Church and State.

It is like fulfilled love; at the same time extreme happiness because separation is overcome, yet also a restlessness because unity is never complete.

He can preach these things because his own achievements are remarkable: by age 33, the chief pediatric neurosurgeon at Johns Hopkins; the surgical - team leader in the first completely successful separation of Siamese twins joined at the head;...

This is a difficult task, because there are so many diverse reasons for the separations, reasons going back to the time of the reformation, reasons which have emerged only later through the historical development of the separated Churches, doctrinal reasons, but also sociological, national, cultural ones which by themselves do not add up to a real denominational difference.

This appears in such vividly told stories as the separation of Abraham and Lot because their herdsmen quarreled, Jacob's journey eastward to Haran to get a wife from among his mother's people and his long service in tending the flocks of his uncle Laban, the famine that sent Jacob's other sons to Egypt for food when Joseph had become Pharaoh's overlord.

Separation is sin because it is a violation of this inherent, unifying purpose.

He and his gang of ne'erdowell's tormented the good denizens of Odyssey in a variety of ways, ranging from the mundane (framing people for murder) to the truly wicked (suing Mr. Whitaker for having a Nativity scene in his front yard because something, something Separation of Church and State.)

Portraying religious dissenters as favoring separation was an effective, if disingenuous, rhetorical tactic because it was so widely accepted by Americans that church and state occupied cooperative relationships.

However, in some abstraction (that is, in the appearance) there is a separation of these particles, because the field in between is weak and may be neglected.

One of the primary reasons we have separation of church and state in the U.S. is because of the inherent Christian need to dirty up the lives of others with trying to prepare them for some alleged next life.

It is because sin is so serious and divine judgment is so real that hell (alienation and separation from God by persistent rejection of him) is a reality upon earth and may well be after death.

I believe in an absolute separation of church and state, because when there is not, then one religion is favoured over anouther.

We systematically undercut ourselves if we try to explain how interrelated theological inquiry and Christian life are by using these categories because they reintroduce the very separation we wish to deny.

Lower court judges and the justices of the Supreme Court have «failed to offer a «principled or predictable alternative» to «strict separation» because they — like the American people — do not agree among themselves on the nature of the problem or how to resolve it.

This is hard for many people to grasp today because we have become so accustomed to thinking of death as a separation of body and soul, implying that the soul is unaffected by death.

But the court's resistance to those claims was not, in my view, because of any mindless fealty to «separation between church and state» — quite the contrary.