Sentences with phrase «serious about enforcement»

And, unless the federal government gets serious about enforcement, nothing may change for the dogs.
«It is imperative that they should be prosecuted for their offending acts in order to pass a message to the society that the government is serious about the enforcement of the aforesaid law,» the petition, a copy of which was obtained by our correspondent, read in part.
There is no contradiction between being serious about enforcement and being welcoming.

Not exact matches

Uber had faced a long string of serious setbacks: A self - driving car that ran a red light, a lawsuit for allegedly stealing the information to create that self - driving car, a scandal about software designed to deceive law enforcement in cities where the company was operating illegally, and video of Kalanick cursing out a driver.
ok i've decided — after soul searching and observing my and other's reactions to these religious blog news on CNN learning more about religion from this alone and about the mideast than from anywhere else in my USA educated life i need to be more tolerant of others having religious based governments THAT is what is confusing me — that religion are governments are not seperated that is hard for much of USA population to understand perhaps it is for me i think you would have to actually live in a society like the mideast to truly understand it i mean — actually be part of the society the religious part is truly offputting — since most in USA seperate church and state like — church is for faith and imagination and celebration and family and community involvement and state is for protection and education and health and infrastructure, etc., for all it is hard to be serious about religion — when the serious side of society is state it is hard to see religion being the serious side of enforcement — and the state enforcing the faith based side of society egad — doesn't god get lost in all that?
Unfortunately, there have been serious questions raised about conflicts of interest, selective enforcement, and politicized investigations by state agencies — JCOPE and the Board of Elections — and those questions should be examined.
When you talk about fighting corruption, you're talking about the Office of the Attorney General and the courts and the statutory law enforcement agencies like the ICPC and EFCC, but, if you can follow me to the offices of some of these agencies, you will discover that we are not serious about fighting corruption.
Bratton, airing his well - known frustrations with federal lawmakers, added, «So if Congress really wants to do something to help the American law enforcement community and the American public, well, let's start getting serious about doing something that they can actually do something about
«There have been serious questions raised about conflicts of interest, selective enforcement and politicized investigations by state agencies. . .
«This incident raises serious concerns about FDA enforcement of prescription drugs,» said state Sen. Jeff Klein (D - Bronx).
From 1991 to 1994 Ciba - Geigy, the company that then manufactured Ritalin (it subsequently merged with Sandoz to become Novartis), gave $ 748,000 to the patient organization, prompting the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration to note that «the relationship between Ciba - Geigy and CHADD raises serious concerns about CHADD's motive in proselytizing the use of Ritalin.»
But the light - hearted press event turned a bit serious when EBONY.com asked about the film's seemingly strong criticism of the U.S. government's drug and immigration policies and methods of enforcement — or lack there of.
Some states and schools are likely to test how serious the administration is about enforcement.
Broadly speaking, when individuals or businesses set up corporate entities in low or no - tax foreign jurisdictions for the purposes of avoiding taxes in their home countries, it raises serious questions about how the federal government should address it, including expanding the responsibilities of the Canada Revenue Agency to tighten enforcement.
By Audrey Lodato, Executive Director Pets Alive Middletown We're always happy when someone from local law enforcement calls and asks us for help because it shows that they are serious about protecting animals.
In this situation, the responsible law enforcement officials were worried about «bad relations» if they conducted a serious investigation.
«I think that, fairly read, the lower courts should take away from today's opinion that the Court is serious about the right to confrontation and that statements describing past incidents to law enforcement agents can not serve as a substitute for live testimony at criminal trials.»
He then said: the administration is «serious about IP enforcement», fair use is not an excuse for infringement, and there is a need to balance both sides of the copyright equation — reward creators and have flexible fair use principles.
We clarify that if a situation fits one section of the rule (e.g., § 164.512 (j) on serious and imminent threats to health or safety), health plans and covered health care providers may disclose protected health information pursuant to that section, regardless of whether the disclosure also could be made pursuant to another section (e.g., § § 164.512 (f)(2) or 164.512 (f)(3), regarding disclosure of protected health information about suspects or victims to law enforcement officials), except as otherwise stated in the rule.
Third, this paragraph allows covered entities to disclose protected health information about an individual without the individual's agreement if the disclosure is expressly authorized by statute or regulation and either: (1) The covered entity, in the exercise of its professional judgment, believes that the disclosure is necessary to prevent serious harm to the individual or to other potential victims; or (2) if the individual is unable to agree due to incapacity, a law enforcement or other public official authorized to received the report represents that the protected health information for which disclosure is sought is not intended to be used against the individual, and that an immediate enforcement activity that depends on the disclosure would be materially and adversely affected by waiting until the individual is able to agree to the disclosure.
The new § 164.512 includes paragraphs on: Uses and disclosures required by law; uses and disclosures for public health activities; disclosures about victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence; uses and disclosures for health oversight activities; disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings; disclosures for law enforcement purposes; uses and disclosures about decedents; uses and disclosures for cadaveric donation of organs, eyes, or tissues; uses and disclosures for research purposes; uses and disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety (which we had called «emergency circumstances» in the NPRM); uses and disclosures for specialized government functions (referred to as «specialized classes» in the NPRM); and disclosures to comply with workers» compensation laws.
We do not give information about you to other government agencies, organisations or anyone else unless one of the following applies: • you have consented; • you'd expect us to or we have told you we will; • it is required or authorised by law; • it will prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to somebody's life or health; or • the disclosure is reasonably necessary for law enforcement or for the protection of public revenue
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z