In October, the Saudis sent a request for information to the U.S., France, South Korea, Russia and China — the strongest signal yet that they're
serious about nuclear power.
Not exact matches
Failing this sort of bold action, Hofmeister sees North America entering an «energy abyss» by the end of the next decade, the result of land (mis) management, an irrational aversion to
nuclear power, and 50 years of ignoring
serious questions
about our resource base and the infrastructure that
powers society.
Perhaps the most
serious concern
about increasing our reliance on
nuclear power is whether it might lead to an international proliferation of atomic bombs.
I often hear
nuclear advocates proclaiming that «
nuclear is THE solution to global warming» and that «no one can be
serious about dealing with global warming if they don't support expanded use of
nuclear power» but I have never heard any
nuclear advocate lay out a plan showing how many
nuclear power plants would have to be built in what period of time to have a significant impact on GHG emissions.
Serious concerns
about the safety, cost, and waste issues associated with
nuclear power remain, and demand continuing scrutiny.
If environmentalists were
serious about clean
power, they would support hydroelectric, geothermal and
nuclear power.
The unfolding catastrophe occurring at the Fukushima plants also raises
serious questions
about our reliance on
nuclear energy and its status as a clean and safe source of
power.