Many p - books contain far more
serious bad design choices.
Not exact matches
With all the evidence, religious people ought to be intelligent
design (I mean god - guided evolution by this) supporters at
worst, though I would hope that after some
serious thoughts on the moral paradoxes induced by belief in the «divine» people would come to their senses.
Only problem is: The
design was so
bad and the public outcry was so loud that the club decided to turn the ugly
design into a Mean Tweets video where their player's read the
worst Twitter insults they could find — and there were some
serious zingers.
The reactors along Japan's Pacific coast suffered no
serious damage from the earthquake, even though its magnitude exceeded the
worst - case scenarios assumed in their
designs.
This question is
designed to expose the fact that because delays in ghg emissions based on costs to the polluter makes the enormous threat of climate change much more difficult to solve and more likely that
serious harms and damages will be experienced, therefore arguments for delays in reducing ghg emissions based upon cost raise moral and ethical issues because the delays are making the problem much
worse, more difficult to solve, and great harms inevitable.