Sentences with phrase «serious crime in the state»

Drunk driving accidents that cause injuries or death are a very serious crime in the state of California.

Driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI) and driving while intoxicated (DWI) are serious crimes in all states.

Not exact matches

Amnesty International says that in previous campaigns, the Shi'ite militias have committed «serious human rights violations, including war crimes» against civilians fleeing Islamic State - held territory.

State - run newspaper Global Times, commonly regarded a Party mouthpiece, publishes an article in which it addresses claims made by Western media outlets that «sex - related crimes are serious in China,» but that the country ««rarely» takes sexual assault allegations seriously.»

The doctrine remains what it has been: that the State, in principle, has the right to impose the death penalty on persons convicted of very serious crimes.

The United States bishops, in their majority statement on capital punishment, conceded that «Catholic teaching has accepted the principle that the State has the right to take the life of a person guilty of an extremely serious crime.»

Such a State is thrown back on positive law, which is purely relativistic, and can cause serious problems — for example, the newly unified Germany had great difficulty in prosecuting Erich Honecker for his crimes, since they were not illegal under the old system of the DDR.

The union representing state university police officers has accused the University at Albany, where crime rates have surged in recent years, of deliberately delaying the reporting of serious incidents, including rapes, to the campus community and the public.

Largely adopting provisions in a bill drafted in 2015 by the State Bar Association in collaboration with the Innocence Project and the District Attorneys» Association of New York, the budget agreement calls for both video recording of custodial interrogations of suspects in serious crimes and reforming procedures for eyewitness identification.

The new law, sponsored by state Sen. Elaine Phillips (R - Long Island), the list of serious offenses will include misdemeanor assault, harassment and other crimes if the perpetrator is in the same family or household as the victim.

Lavine's legislation would add felony and misdemeanor hate crimes to the list of «serious offenses» in state penal law that disqualify individuals from possessing firearms.

Anthony Mangone, a former attorney whose cooperation aided the conviction of three New York state senators, has been sentenced to 18 months in prison by a judge who said his crimes were too serious to let him escape incarceration.

It was a bad week for Anthony Mangone, a former attorney whose cooperation aided in the conviction of three New York state senators, who was sentenced to 18 months behind bars this week after a judge said the «dirty lawyer» had committed crimes too serious to escape incarceration.

He stated that the spate of kidnapping in the State had gotten to a level that required decisive action from government, hence the need for the enactment of the law to send serious message to perpetrators of such heinous crime.

«Excuse me, commits a serious crime,» Hynes corrected himself, «goes to prison, comes out, rehabilitates himself, becomes an ordained minister, and someone who is one of the most powerful Democratic leaders in this state, who is a serial thief and extortionist.

When the previous government announced it was appealing against the European Court's original ruling in 2005, the Parliamentary Under - Secretary of State at the Department for Constitutional Affairs, Lord Firkin, said: «It has been the view of successive governments, including this government, that persons who have committed crimes serious enough to warrant a custodial sentence should forfeit the right to have a say in how the country is governed while they are detained.»

In the past decade, more than 30 current or former state officeholders in New York have been convicted of crimes, sanctioned or otherwise accused of serious wrongdoinIn the past decade, more than 30 current or former state officeholders in New York have been convicted of crimes, sanctioned or otherwise accused of serious wrongdoinin New York have been convicted of crimes, sanctioned or otherwise accused of serious wrongdoing.

Dale and his wife, Dori, are among those urging state lawmakers to take up a long - stalled bill in the final seven weeks of the legislative session that would increase the time between mandatory parole hearings for those convicted of a serious violent crime.

When Senate Republicans balked at raising the age for teenagers accused of serious crimes to be sent to state prison from 16 to 18, Cuomo issued an executive order to remove 16 - and 17 - year - olds from the jails and place them in youth detention instead.

With former Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and former Senate leader Dean Skelos scheduled to be sentenced next month for public corruption crimes, and a recent poll showing that nearly 90 percent of New Yorkers believe unethical behavior is a serious problem in state government, Albany's political leaders have an obligation to reach a significant agreement on ethics reform, the good government groups said.

County G.O.P. Chairman Mike Grasso said that the citizens of the county felt secure with the state of local law enforcement, particularly how York and his staff were concentrating on battling the spread of hard drugs in the county, and targeting other serious crimes.

Most of the serious and violent crime in the United States is not the way that people make a living, and it is not deeply motivated, it's superficially motivated.

While the actual arrests of congressmen, one senator and some state officials are doubtless more serious in real life, this movie gives the impression that life is a jolly carousel of human nature, with crime - busters and lawbreakers going full circle.

Insurance fraud is a serious crime, and affects the rates everyone in the state pays for Pennsylvania Life Insurance.

These windows are designed to prevent the appearance of insider trading, which is a serious crime in the United States.

Pitbulls are disproportionately involved in serious attacks on humans, just as African Americans are found guilty of a disproportionate number of crimes in the United States.

What Article 28 (3) with its omission of public policy grounds seems to suggest in my view is that — to a certain extent — the mere fact of a 10 years residence has created a link between the EU citizen and the host Member State that is similar to the link between a national and its state; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized cState that is similar to the link between a national and its state; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized cstate; as a consequence expulsion can only be a valid means if this link is deliberately destroyed by the EU citizen; this would be the case of a serious security threat, i.e. an individual determined to engage in actions that jeopardize the security of the host Member State's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized cState's society at large, which could indeed be the case of organized crime.

Under California's Three Strikes Law, serious and violent crimes count as strikes, and state convictions result in lengthy mandatory prison sentences.

In my opinion the ECJ's decision in Taricco I that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.In my opinion the ECJ's decision in Taricco I that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.in Taricco I that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Articles 2 and 3 of the Italian Constitution, and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 (2) Const.).

The specifics are going to differ from state to state, but in general, murder is the more serious crime and carries a more serious punishment.

The Luxembourg Court, in adherence to the great shift in thoughts aimed at protecting «the rule of law at the national and international levels», as the United Nations General Assembly urges (see UN GA Resolution A / RES / 67 / 2012), and intended to repress the crime of serious VAT fraud, with established an effective measure (i.e., the disapplication of national rules incompatible with Article 325 (1) TFEU, Article 2 (1) of the 1995 PIF Convention as well as Directive 2006/112 on the EU's common system of VAT, read in conjunction with Article 4 (3) TEU) which, alongside the guilty, condemns States defaulting and disrespecting EU law and the founding principles of the world legal order.

As these are serious crimes in the United States, different facets of authorities are empowered to weed out the offenders.

Elliot M. Weinstein is a criminal defense attorney who represents people accused of serious crimes in both federal and state courts.

Aggressive Defense In State And Federal Courts — Drug Crimes, Domestic Violence, Sex Crimes, DUI And Other Serious Crimes We are ready to apply our skills and dedication to the protection of your rights and freedom.

In the state of California, drug crimes are a serious matter that can make it tough for someone to find a job, rent a property, keep their professional license, or become a U.S. citizen.

In the United States, bail may be set for relatively minor arrests (DUI arrests, drug arrests) as well as for more serious crimes.

Sex crimes are a serious problem in Illinois, and the state has allocated a lot of time, effort, and money into prosecuting these offenses.

At the Eversole Law Offices, we help clients in Jefferson, Madison and Shelby Counties and throughout Alabama who are accused of all types of state or federal crimes, from driving under the influence (DUI) to drug or narcotics offenses to very serious or violent crimes.

Federal crimes in the United States involve serious charges and complex procedures that go far beyond conventional crimes at the state level.

Federal criminal charges can be the most serious in the United States, and you need a Los Angeles federal crimes attorney who is capable of dealing with such aggressive opponents.

The ECJ's decision that national courts must disapply the rules of statutes of limitations if they prevent Member States from fulfilling their obligations under Article 325 TFEU (in the present case, the relevant Italian legislation) leads to perceiving serious fraud as a crime against the rights and interests of citizens, i.e., against fundamental social human rights guaranteed under Arts. 2 and 3 Const., and hence calls for resolving the conflict within the Italian Constitution by balancing the rights under these articles and the accused's individual rights guaranteed by the legality principle (Art. 25 Const.)

A basis for the exercise of state jurisdiction over an individual in respect of a criminal act regardless of the location of the act or the nationality of the individual or victim; invoked only in connection with serious international crimes such

In 1963, seven years after creation of NLADA's Defender section, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its historic ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright that a low - income person accused of a serious crime was entitled to defense counsel at state expense — a foundation of modern public defensIn 1963, seven years after creation of NLADA's Defender section, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its historic ruling in Gideon v. Wainwright that a low - income person accused of a serious crime was entitled to defense counsel at state expense — a foundation of modern public defensin Gideon v. Wainwright that a low - income person accused of a serious crime was entitled to defense counsel at state expense — a foundation of modern public defense.

Member states would have to impose custodial sentences of at least five years or financial penalties on offending companies of at least $ 750,000 for particularly serious crimes, such as those that have resulted in death or serious injury.

Bennett & Bennett are a husband - and - wife team of Houston criminal - defense lawyers representing people charged with serious crimes, misdemeanors and felonies, in state and federal courts since 1995.

Insurance fraud is a serious crime, and affects the rates everyone in the state pays for Pennsylvania Life Insurance.

Insurance fraud is a serious crime, and affects the rates everyone in the state pays for Mississippi Life Insurance.

In the state of Illinois, driving under the influence (DUI) is a serious offense that is classified as a violent crime.

A felony is a the most serious type of crime and is punishable by hefty fees, lengthy prison sentences or, in some states, death.

Legislation regarding mandatory imprisonment in Western Australia and the Northern Territory, which leads in many cases to imposition of punishments that are disproportionate to the seriousness of the crimes committed and would seem to be inconsistent with the strategies adopted by the State party to reduce the over-representation of indigenous persons in the criminal justice system, raises serious issues of compliance with various articles of the Covenant.