Sentences with phrase «serious criminal conviction»

That check is then run every time someone buys a gun to ensure he or she is eligible to buy a gun and doesn't have a serious criminal conviction on their record.

What about serious criminal convictions?

Not exact matches

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, has said he wants to make sure that people who can't legally own guns — those with criminal convictions, serious mental health issues, or active restraining orders — aren't somehow falling through the cracks and holding onto their firearms.

Fourteen of the inmates are still on the run and the government confirmed all the missing inmates have criminal convictions, although stressed none are for serious crimes.

A few serious items, such as criminal convictions, can be listed indefinitely.

The Armed Career Criminal Act provides that if a person is convicted of a crime involving the use of a firearm and the individual has three or more earlier convictions for a «serious drug offense» or a «violent felony,» the prison term is a minimum of 15 years and a maximum of life.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, and accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against conviction dismissed — Although trial judge did not address analytical steps in order, he properly analyzed evidence and concluded that injuries sustained by victim were not accidental and could not have occurred in any other fashion than as stated by victim — Having provided reasons for accepting victim's evidence, trial judge was entitled to reject accused's evidence — Trial judge's reasoning, though skeletal, permitted accused and appellate court to determine how and why finding resulted.

Accused went to cottage of JC with whom she previously cohabited — Accused found JC with victim, another lady, in sauna — Angry words were exchanged between accused and JC — Victim testified that accused pushed her following verbal exchange, as a result victim lost balance and ended up against stove, thereby sustaining serious burns to body — Trial judge accepted victim's evidence that there was some kind of pushing — Accused convicted on one count of assault causing bodily harm, and sentenced to two - year term of probation and $ 1,000.00 fine, accused was also ordered to provide DNA sample pursuant to s. 487.04 of Criminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public iCriminal Code — Accused appealed — Appeal against sentence was allowed — Trial judge erred in concluding that discharge was not appropriate in circumstances, especially given conclusion that accused did not deliberately attempt to injure victim — Trial judge found that there was no need for either specific deterrence or general deterrence; prime concern was need for denunciation of her conduct — Section 730 of Criminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public iCriminal Code permits discharge in cases of this nature, provided that it was in best interest of accused and not contrary to public interest — Accused was responsible individual with no record whatsoever, she held position as counsellor and social worker for 25 years — Trial judge did not find that conviction would definitely affect her employment, but possibility existed, and such conviction would necessarily result in criminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public icriminal record — There was no likelihood of re-offending — Conditional discharge would not be contrary to public interest.

Criminal prosecution or conviction can have serious consequences for residents of Minneapolis and St. Paul and greater Minnesota who are not U.S. citizens.

In any event, the stigma associated with a criminal conviction is not appropriate for less serious breaches of regulatory rules.

The firms jointly advised the company on the investigations, assisting with enquires from the UK Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the US Department of Justice, and coordinating the subsequent resolution (while avoiding further investigations, a lengthy court prosecution and a possible criminal conviction).

Here is an example that came up in my criminal law class: Recent recalls of General Motors cars have raised doubts about criminal convictions resulting from deaths in many serious car crashes involving GM cars.

In some more serious cases, a conviction can count as a strike on your criminal record.

While charges for disorderly conduct may seem insignificant, a conviction can carry serious criminal penalties.

The ruling, says Straw, could affect hundreds of cases in the prosecution pipeline and raises fears that serious convicted criminals could seek to use the technicality of the judgment to have their convictions quashed.

Criminal offences under Canada's criminal code are divided into three kinds: indictable offences which are the more serious offences and which carry longer terms of imprisonment, summary convictions which are the less serious offences usually punishable by less than 2 years imprisonment and hybrid offences which can be prosecuted as either indictable or Criminal offences under Canada's criminal code are divided into three kinds: indictable offences which are the more serious offences and which carry longer terms of imprisonment, summary convictions which are the less serious offences usually punishable by less than 2 years imprisonment and hybrid offences which can be prosecuted as either indictable or criminal code are divided into three kinds: indictable offences which are the more serious offences and which carry longer terms of imprisonment, summary convictions which are the less serious offences usually punishable by less than 2 years imprisonment and hybrid offences which can be prosecuted as either indictable or summary.

Under the Criminal Code of Canada, anyone that is found guilty of Fraud under $ 5000 is guilty of an indictable offense that is punishable by a term of imprisonment up to two years or, in less serious cases, by an offence punishable on summary conviction.

All criminal convictions have serious penalties and often unexpected consequences.

It is important to understand that a conviction for a Class 3 Felony offense can have serious criminal consequences.

From mandatory sentences of imprisonment to asset forfeiture legislation, the ramifications of a criminal conviction have never been more serious.

Attorney Michael McKneely is aware of the devastating consequences that criminal convictions cause, and he will help you avoid serious penalties.

Aside from the mandatory minimum penalties prescribed by the Criminal Code for an Impaired Driving conviction, the accused faces other serious problems.

Not only does a sex crimes conviction carry serious criminal penalties, but can also require you to register as a sex offender for the rest of your life.

Being charged with a criminal offence is a frightening and overwhelming experience and the consequences of a conviction can be especially serious.

The McKneely Law Firm understands the serious life - altering consequences that follow a criminal conviction.

This experience — including high - profile cases such as a conviction obtained 15 years after a murder — is a strong asset for people who need able representation in their defense against serious criminal charges.

When a person pleads guilty or is found guilty of a criminal offense, the judge then has to decide whether the conduct was serious enough to warrant the imposition of the stigma of a criminal conviction, or whether a discharge could be granted.

Usually, the Crown Attorney will proceed by summary conviction for less serious offences, but they may choose to proceed by indictment after considering factors such as the seriousness of allegations or the accused's prior criminal record.

Addressing this issue, particular value should be attached to those cases where the defendant provides evidence in the form of a witness statement or is prepared to give evidence at any subsequent trial, and does so, with added force where the information either produces convictions for the most serious offences, including terrorism and murder, or prevents them, or which leads to disruption to or indeed the break up of major criminal gangs.

Serious tax penalties, property seizures, criminal convictions and prison terms routinely follow in all cases of people who attempt to do this in practice.

Even if the offense is a misdemeanor, a conviction could tarnish your criminal record for years to come and result in more serious penalties in the future.

(4) A relevant decision may not be taken except on imperative grounds of public security in respect of an EEA national who: (a) has resided in the UK for a continuous period of at least 10 years before the relevant decision; or... (5) Where a relevant decision is taken on grounds of public policy or public security it shall, in addition to complying with the preceding paragraphs of this regulation, be taken in accordance with the following principles --(a) the decision must comply with the principle of proportionality; (b) the decision must be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the person concerned; (c) the personal conduct of the person concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society; (d) matters isolated from the particulars of the case or which relate to considerations of general prevention do not justify the decision; and (e) a person's previous criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the decision.

Usually, these are applicants with a recent criminal conviction, serious health issues, or heavy cigarettes smokers.

DUI convictions are serious criminal offenses and they are dealt with accordingly.

Sometimes, certain insurance companies won't even offer to insure you have too many convictions or claims (or serious or criminal convictions), in which case you might have to go with a high - risk company or even the government's high - risk program.

While it almost goes without saying, serious and criminal convictions on your record such as DUIs, stunt driving or careless driving can make motorcycle insurance prohibitively expensive.

Failing to convict a known criminal is also a serious error, but generally agreed it's less serious than a wrongful conviction.

The crimes in this category include theft from employer, theft of large sums of money, serious fraud cases, embezzlement, criminal breach of trust, forgery, or any other business related crime, or a conviction for a crime where he or she was in a position of trust.