Sentences with phrase «serious health or safety»

Unless there are serious health or safety concerns at play, every co-parent should do their best to fortify their child's relationship with their other parent.

Not exact matches

Citing «an immediate serious danger to the public health, safety or welfare» and to residents at the facility, the Agency for Health Care Administration stopped Floridian Gardens Assisted Living Facility from admitting any new resihealth, safety or welfare» and to residents at the facility, the Agency for Health Care Administration stopped Floridian Gardens Assisted Living Facility from admitting any new resiHealth Care Administration stopped Floridian Gardens Assisted Living Facility from admitting any new residents.

I've always been under the impression that the «conservative» view of abortion is that it should NOT be allowed EXCEPT in cases of rape, incest, or when competent medical authorities determine that the health and safety of the mother and / or child is at serious risk (but not justifying the abortion of a child simply for having a mental or physical disability).

Under the FDA's Food Safety Modernization Act, the agency does have the authority to order the recall of certain food products when the FDA determines that there is a reasonable probability that the article of food is adulterated or in violation of certain allergen labeling requirements and that the use of or exposure to such article will cause serious adverse health consequences or death to humans or animals.

If your grandchild tells you something, don't pass it on to the parents unless it is a serious matter involving health or safety.

«This provision will provide for the removal of operators where there exists serious financial, health or safety issues to protect shelter residents and prevent significant costs to the state,» Azzopardi said.

«The fact that EPA staff at the agency's headquarters in Washington, D.C., knew or should have known about the problem, and failed to communicate with their counterparts in region 2, raises serious questions, considering the health and safety of the residents of Hoosick Falls was at stake.»

The California criminal charges arise from citations and fines that the state's Division of Occupational Safety and Health leveled against U.C.L.A. in May 2009 for «serious» violations, among them failing to make timely corrections of unsafe conditions or to provide required training and personal protective gear.

Health and safety risks included: serious fire hazards such as obstructed exits; unsafe and unhygienic premises; and staff and volunteers who had not been properly checked or cleared to work with children.

Not providing training, especially on critical Health & Safety and business protection issues, is not an option (unless you want to end up in court explaining a breach of policy, or worse a serious accident and injury).

Or it can signal serious health and safety concerns in a community.

Despite the Health & Safety Executive's (HSE) well - publicised support of LOtC, we should not consider that when faced with poor practice resulting in death or serious injury they would allow it to preclude an investigation and prosecution.

Abandonment: «Abandon» means to intentionally deposit, leave, or drop off any live animal without providing for the care of that animal; or in a situation where conditions present an immediate, direct, and serious threat to the life, safety, or health of the animal.

Striving to decrease our shelter intake, increase our live release rates and to reserve euthanasia for animals that have serious medical conditions with great suffering, or behavior issues that pose a threat to the public's health and safety and the animal's well - being.

An animal control officer may impound any animal that constitutes a serious and imminent threat to public health and / or safety due to the likelihood of its escape from its restraint.

Section 104 provides for citations to be issued for «health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to a serious injury if left unabated.»

But, threats to someones health and or safety is a serious matter.

Department of Health Letter Warns Yaz Advertising is Misleading, Raises Serious Public Health and Safety Concerns — If you or a woman you know has been injured by the dangerous side effects of Yaz or Yasmin, call Shelly Leeke, Injury Law Firm today, 843-277-6061.

In the latter regard, the Press Complaints Commission code of practice committee (of which interestingly and perhaps worryingly, depending on your viewpoint, Mr Dacre is chairman) defines the public interest very clearly as: (i) Detecting or exposing crime or serious impropriety; (ii) Protecting public health and safety; (iii) Preventing the public from being misled by an action or statement of an individual or organisation.

«(2) The jury must consider whether or not the evidence shows that the organisation failed to comply with any health and safety legislation that relates to the alleged breach, and if so --(a) how serious that failure was; (b) how much of a risk of death it posed.

Accidents or a breach of health and safety can occur unexpectedly in a workplace, leading to prosecution and serious consequences for a business.

The standard is high; the service provider must show that allowing the animal would jeopardize their financial well ‑ being or pose a serious health and safety risk.

Many of my clients are companies and individual directors charged with serious health & safety, environment, or other regulatory offences.

If the left happened because the freelancer failed to lock up at closing time, the serious health condition was duty to a failure to be careful to maintain safety precautions in their absence, or the fire was due to the freelancer smoking near petrol storage areas, the freelancer would probably have liability.

(i)(A) Is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public; and

A covered entity may not, however, include a limitation affecting its right to make a use or disclosure that is either required by law or is necessary to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety.

Similarly, in situations involving a serious and imminent threat to public health or safety, law enforcement officials may be seeking protected health information from covered entities to locate a fugitive.

We believe that the extremely time - sensitive and urgent conditions surrounding the need to avert a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety are fundamentally different from those involved in disclosures that may be made pursuant to other sections of the rule.

Another commented that the standard «* * * based on a reasonable belief that the disclosures are necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of an individual» would apply in only narrow treatment circumstances.

We clarify that if a situation fits one section of the rule (e.g., § 164.512 (j) on serious and imminent threats to health or safety), health plans and covered health care providers may disclose protected health information pursuant to that section, regardless of whether the disclosure also could be made pursuant to another section (e.g., § § 164.512 (f)(2) or 164.512 (f)(3), regarding disclosure of protected health information about suspects or victims to law enforcement officials), except as otherwise stated in the rule.

The final rule requires covered entities to obtain authorization to use or disclose psychotherapy notes for purposes listed in § 164.512, with the following exceptions: An authorization is not required for use or disclosure of psychotherapy notes when the use or disclosure is required for enforcement of this rule, in accordance with § 164.502 (a)(2)(ii); when required by law, in accordance with § 164.512 (a); when needed for oversight of the covered health care provider who created the psychotherapy notes, in accordance with § 164.512 (d); when needed by a coroner or medical examiner, in accordance with § 164.512 (g)(1); or when needed to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety, in accordance with § 164.512 (j)(1)(i).

In the final rule, to avoid confusion over the circumstances in which we intend this section to apply, we retitle it «Uses and Disclosures to Avert a Serious Threat to Health or Safety.»

However, we continue to permit a covered entity to disclose protected health information to a health care Start Printed Page 82730provider in an emergency treatment situation if the restricted protected health information is needed to provide the emergency treatment or if the disclosure is necessary to avoid serious and imminent threats to public health and safety.

An authorization is not required for use or disclosure of psychotherapy notes when required for enforcement purposes, in accordance with subpart C of part 160 of this subchapter; when mandated by law, in accordance with § 164.512 (a); when needed for oversight of the health care provider who created the psychotherapy notes, in accordance with § 164.512 (d); when needed by a coroner or medical examiner, in accordance with § 164.512 (g)(1); or when needed to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety, in accordance with § 164.512 (j)(1)(i).

The new § 164.512 includes paragraphs on: Uses and disclosures required by law; uses and disclosures for public health activities; disclosures about victims of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence; uses and disclosures for health oversight activities; disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings; disclosures for law enforcement purposes; uses and disclosures about decedents; uses and disclosures for cadaveric donation of organs, eyes, or tissues; uses and disclosures for research purposes; uses and disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety (which we had called «emergency circumstances» in the NPRM); uses and disclosures for specialized government functions (referred to as «specialized classes» in the NPRM); and disclosures to comply with workers» compensation laws.

For example, a disclosure under § 164.512 (j)(1)(i) to avert an imminent threat to safety is lawful only if made in the good faith belief that the disclosure is necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public, and to a person reasonably able to prevent or lessen the threat.

The covered entity may not, however, purport to preclude itself from making uses or disclosures that are required by law or that are necessary to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety.

In the final rule, we clarify that if a situation fits one section of the rule (for example, § 164.512 (j) on serious and imminent threats to health or safety), covered entities may disclose protected health information pursuant to that section, regardless of whether the disclosure also could be made pursuant to another section (e.g., § 164.512 (f)-RRB-, regarding disclosure to law enforcement officials).

A covered entity may not include statements in the notice that purport to limit the entity's ability to make uses or disclosures that are required by law or necessary to avert a serious and imminent threat to health or safety.

(j) Standard: Uses and disclosures to avert a serious threat to health or safety.

In the NPRM we proposed to allow covered entities to use or disclose protected health information without individual authorization — consistent with applicable law and ethics standards — based on a reasonable belief that use or disclosure of the protected health information was necessary to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to health or safety of an individual or of the public.

If this was done within the scope of a mandatory reporting law, it is legal to disclose PHI; under § 164.512 it is allowed, «to prevent or lessen a serious and imminent threat to the health or safety of a person or the public».

Under certain circumstances, we may use and disclose PHI to law enforcement personnel or other appropriate persons to prevent or lessen a serious threat to the health or safety of a person or to assist in disaster relief efforts.

To Avoid a Serious Threat to Health or Safety.

To avert a serious threat to health or safety: We may use and disclose your information when necessary to prevent a serious and imminent threat to your health and safety or to the health and safety of the public or another person.

If the gardaí have reason to believe that there is an immediate and serious risk to the health or welfare of a child which can not wait until an emergency care order is made, they have the power to enter the home and remove a child, by force if necessary, to safety.

Out - of - home care encompasses the placements and services provided to children and families when children must be removed from their homes because of child safety concerns, as a result of serious parent - child conflict, or to treat serious physical or behavioral health conditions that can not be addressed within the family.

To Avert a Serious Threat to Health or Safety.

We may use and disclose health information about you when necessary to prevent a serious threat to your health and safety or the health and safety of the public or another person.

We may also share your information when needed to lessen a serious and imminent threat to health or safety.