Sentences with phrase «serious justice problem»

In Mali the figure was 30 % — at an average rate of one serious justice problem every two years.

Serious justice problems are known to lead to significant health issues, and they hit the poorest hardest.

Not exact matches

The Justice Department has serious and pervasive problems with how it addresses sexual misconduct complaints made by its own employees, the department's inspector general found in a recent report obtained by The Washington Post through Freedom of Information Act requests.

A Christian MP has said the there is «serious problem in the criminal justice system» after a report... More

The Charter has caused serious problems — of theology, justice, and morale — which continue to bedevil and undermine the Catholic priesthood in the United States.

A Christian MP has said the there is «serious problem in the criminal justice system» after a report found ethnic minority defendants are more likely to be jailed for some crimes than white people.

What is more serious, they either neglect or respond inappropriately to the most fateful moral problems facing all humanity: the problem of economic justice in this country and in others, and the struggle for peace — especially the struggle to prevent nuclear war.

Secondly, according to this article related to Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, severe problems related to justice may trigger serious penalties.

One criticism: the belief that the Justice Center may be spending too much time pursuing relatively minor allegations of abuse or neglect and in the process missing more serious problems.

«There is a serious violent problem within the criminal justice system and we believe it's out of control.»

«It is shameful and utterly irresponsible for UNESCO to award this prize, given the litany of serious legal and ethical problems surrounding it,» Tutu Alicante, director of the human rights group EG Justice, said in a statement released today.

The 2014 letter declares that «Studies have suggested a correlation between exclusionary discipline policies and practices and an array of serious educational, economic, and social problems, including school avoidance... decreased academic achievement... increased likelihood of dropping out; substance abuse; and involvement with juvenile justice systems.»

Because young people in cities have serious issues and problems in their faces everyday, and many of those problems have implications for social justice — such as race, class, and power — we try to have students and teachers together explore the root causes of problems.

In testimony last week before the Connecticut General Assembly, the Connecticut Coalition for Justice in Education Funding [CCJEF] identified the most serious problems with Malloy's plan to slash funding for public schools in Connecticut.

Studies have suggested a correlation between exclusionary discipline policies and practices and an array of serious educational, economic, and social problems, including school avoidance and diminished educational engagement; 9 decreased academic achievement; 10 increased behavior problems; 11 increased likelihood of dropping out; 12 substance abuse; 13 and involvement with juvenile justice systems.14

When an entire issue has every appearance of looking like it's steered by emotionally - driven figurative lynch mobs whose goal is to achieve «climate justice» by any means possible, including negating facts from critics through character assassination, you have one very serious problem on your hands.

Many of them are interesting, and taken as a group, they offer up an excellent — and quick — tour of a philosophical territory that we'll have to carefully explore if ever we want a really serious approach to the problem of global climate justice.

Also relevant is the fact, as acknowledged elsewhere by the LSUC, that Ontario has a serious access to justice problem (see also the recent work of the CFCJ).

This paragraph in particular of Malcolm Mercer's article obscures the law society's great negligence in failing to try to solve the problem, «If we are serious about the access to justice gap, we should accept that no one solution will slay the access dragon.

It is widely accepted that many people with serious civil justice problems do not have access to the courts and thus do not appear as un-represented litigants.

We need new approaches in the quiver of access of justice services to address the vast majority of legal problems experienced by the public that are, from the point of view of the people experiencing them, serious and difficult to resolve and that have negative consequences if they are not dealt with.

This is the most serious and damaging problem that Canada's justice system and the legal profession have ever faced.

Most recently, newly appointed Supreme Court judge Mr. Justice Richard Wagner stated «If you don't make sure there is access to justice, it can create serious problems for demJustice Richard Wagner stated «If you don't make sure there is access to justice, it can create serious problems for demjustice, it can create serious problems for democracy.

LAG would suggest that, if the government is serious about access to justice it needs to put back capacity into the system so that these people can get early advice on their legal problems.

The president of the Supreme Court, Lord Neuberger, has also said the country has a «serious problem» with access to justice and that society will fragment without access to justice, as reported by Legal Voice.

The first question one should ask potential clients is about how much justice they can afford, especially in light of the serious problems facing economically disadvantaged litigants as reported recently in a Toronto Star article («Legal Aid facing «troubling cuts»»):

This is the only possibly effective course of action for the serious problems of Canada's justice system.

So we have to look at the «justice system» in a different, more comprehensive and flexible way — because the problems these people have are real and serious problems, even if the adversarial justice process has nothing that will help solve them.

Lawtender believes, and itself warns, that U.S. citizens» access to justice is a serious problem, although it's not sure if ranking a subfactor of the WJP Index — something which the WJP didn't do in its report — is particularly scientific, especially when the data is based largely on an online survey of 1002 people in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago.

Although the Ministry of Justice has spent the last two years reviewing homicide law, there still remains a serious problem around «one - punch killers» which means punishment for bad luck, according to: Barry Mitchell, Professor of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, Coventry University Law School One of the criticisms the writer and others have of the current law is that it makes it too easy for a person to be convicted of manslaughter, essentially because the law pitches the minimum level of culpability too low.

Its Access to Justice Committee should be prominently displayed, inviting comments and questions in regard to this most serious of law society problems.

There is broad recognition of a serious access to justice problem in Canada [10].

Lady Justice King highlighted the problems arising from lack of public funding for cases and concluded «serious consequences» could arise if solicitors were not able to accept instructions on a limited retainer basis.

Lord Justice Pill based this primarily on the view that these procedures (good in aim but a serious problem in practice) were not meant to act as traps for unwary claimants in an area as important as equal pay claims in the public sector.

; (4) taxpayers would not have to pay for a justice system that provides lawyers a good place to earn a living but doesn't provide affordable legal services for those taxpayers; (5) the problem wouldn't be causing more damage in one day than all of the incompetent and unethical lawyers have caused in the whole of Canada's history (6) the legal profession would be expanding instead of contracting; because, (7) if legal services were affordable, lawyers would have more work than they could handle because people have never needed lawyers more; (8) law schools would be expanding their enrolments instead of being urged to contract them; (9) the problem would not be causing serious & increasing damage to the population, the courts, the legal profession, and to legal aid organizations because their funding varies inversely with the cost of legal services for taxpayers who finance legal aid's free legal services; (10) there would be a published LSUC text that declares the problem to be its problem and duty to solve it, and accurately defines the problem; (11) Canada would not have a seriously «legally crippled» population and constitution - the Canadian Charter of Rights an Freedoms is a «paper tiger» without the help of a lawyer; (12) Canada's justice system might again be «the envy of the world»; (13) the public statements of benchers would not show that they don't understand the cause of the problem and haven't tried to understand it; (14) LSUC's webpage, «Your Legal Bill - To High?»

But if more politicians were aware of how serious the problems of access to justice are, they might just have been doing more about them.

Justices Abella and Rothstein called the husband's claim that the wife was «embellishing» her health problems «unpalatable and unworthy of serious consideration.»

There is a serious access to justice problem in Canada.

• Most often the reasons people give for staying away from the justice system are doubts that it would help, concern about cost, a sense the problem was not serious enough, or a desire to handle matters on their own.

They argued that these individuals come in contact with criminal justice authorities as a result of behaviors stemming directly from their illness and assert that these provisions will cause serious problems.

However, correcting the problem requires serious systematic reforms and sizeable investments which begin from improving human resources in the justice system, to enhancing organisational structures while accelerating the digitalisation process.

It includes recommendations to increase the availability of programs to divert people living with mental health problems and illnesses from the corrections system, provide appropriate mental health services in the youth and adult criminal justice system and ensuring that comprehensive discharge plans are in place, address gaps in treatment programs for offenders with serious and complex mental health needs, increase the role of the «civil» mental health system in providing services, and provide training about mental - health problems and illnesses to those working in the criminal justice system.