The Chairman of the APC in the state, Mr. John Ochala, alleged that the lukewarm attitude of the present leadership of the state over
serious matters of public concern, including security of lives and properties was only one aspect of the failure of the PDP - led government.
Not exact matches
The
matter of there still (as I understand) being proprietary data out there is a
serious problem that can probably not be addressed from the scientific community, but needs to be dealt with by legislators when they
concern themselves with copyright laws and
public service funding.
The submission that the issues which arise here were
matters for the Executive or Legislature under Article 120
of the UAE Constitution because they
concerned foreign affairs and questions
of public policy (ordre
public) or a
matter for the UAE Supreme Court if there was any
serious issue / doubt under the Constitution as to the organ which should determine such questions, falls away once it is seen that waiver
of immunity is a question to be determined by the judiciary as part
of the contractual and procedural law
of the DIFC.
(4) A relevant decision may not be taken except on imperative grounds
of public security in respect
of an EEA national who: (a) has resided in the UK for a continuous period
of at least 10 years before the relevant decision; or... (5) Where a relevant decision is taken on grounds
of public policy or
public security it shall, in addition to complying with the preceding paragraphs
of this regulation, be taken in accordance with the following principles --(a) the decision must comply with the principle
of proportionality; (b) the decision must be based exclusively on the personal conduct
of the person
concerned; (c) the personal conduct
of the person
concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently
serious threat affecting one
of the fundamental interests
of society; (d)
matters isolated from the particulars
of the case or which relate to considerations
of general prevention do not justify the decision; and (e) a person's previous criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the decision.