The series also confronts
some serious philosophical issues in the last book, That Hideous Strength.
Not exact matches
While the study by Melanie Rudd, Jennifer Aaker, and Michael I. Norton doesn't pretend to offer answers to eternal
philosophical quandaries of meaning and satisfaction nor sort out
serious psychological
issues, it does indicate that for day - to - day good vibes, we might all do better aiming a little closer to the earth.
For Leff, readers «can attest to the rhetorical power of this blend,» of mixing «playful attacks against the professional and
philosophical pursuits (but not the persons)» of the prosecutors, including the powerful Cato, «deadly
serious emotional appeals,» and «deft maneuvering around the specific legal
issues.»
And if you want to amuse yourself for an hour, look at the first few
issues of their journal The
Philosophical Transaction, filled with deadly
serious experiments and a whole lot of various sort of flakey, gentlemanly figures who sent in all kinds of, well, just observations.
That isn't to say it is simple — it isn't, there are some
serious philosophical and ethical
issues addressed throughout the game — but it is told in a more effective way.