Sentences with phrase «serious social analysis»

Not exact matches

While this may be excusable in Howard and Streck since they are writing a work of social analysis, there are sociological issues that deserve serious engagement.
You will look long, hard, and futilely to find in His Holiness any serious analysis of the Pope's ground - breaking nuptial theology of the human body, or his emerging feminism, or his intense ecumenical outreach to Orthodoxy and the Reformation churches, or his commitment to a theological dialogue with Judaism unprecedented in nearly two thousand years, or his refocusing of Catholic social doctrine, or his passionate interest in the universality of sanctity in the Church, or his dialogue with atheist and agnostic philosophers and scientists, or his commitment to the «method of persuasion» in a revitalized Catholic evangelism, or his millennial sensibility.
I'm not talking about the Macaca moments, blogger controversies or the unpropitious arrival of various kinds of unflattering documents, but about serious analysis of intentional campaign tools and strategies, such as websites, social networking outreach, blogs and social media.
«The short - term, indirect threats are not merely «bumps in the road» — they are serious problems that require a greater analysis of social, economic, and political issues stemming from changes already occurring.»
Taking a neutral stance at this point on rehashed work from «NIPCC» (Fred Singer and friends), well known for serial, serious errors in overall interpretation, analysis and communication of the science and transparent but largely unexamined ideological bias at play in their playground «reports» — never mind suggesting that this kind of effort «competes» with the work of the world's climate scientists and the 2,500 multidisciplinary specialists contributing to IPCC reports combined with the tens of thousands of additional scientists and many others who raise real questions that result from reading, reviewing, evaluating and evolving the information in both IPCC summaries and domestic science and discussion of the science, knowledgeably and in good faith and with open identification of the nature of the social and political issues — is just not credible.
Interestingly they also address social network analysis — it reads as a serious early attempt to look at the tangles that occur when multiple problems interact that affect public health and there's no easy way to get hold of leverage that works.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z