Because our knowledge of the many delicate balances in the ecology of the planet is still in its infancy, and because what is known is not widely understood, the consequences of what the human race is (in its ignorance) doing to the earth may turn out to be even more
serious than global warming.
Not exact matches
In the particularly difficult question of
global warming, thus far most economists have argued that it will be more efficient to respond to the problems caused by
global warming as they occur
than to make
serious efforts to reduce it, since these efforts would slow economic growth.
The implicit assumption here is that the problem will turn out to be less
serious than the models predict; thus, any carbon we have chosen to leave in the ground out of fear for the consequences of
global warming will have gone uncombusted for nothing.
Climate - change skeptics have pointed to the emails as evidence that researchers were manipulating data to make
global warming look more
serious than it is.
The fact that virtually half of them believe the student loan crisis is a more
serious threat to the U.S.
than global warming, which may wipe out entire cities, is a telling indication of the severity of this country's educational debts.
250 millennials, or 48.5 percent, think the $ 1.41 trillion student loan crisis is a more
serious issue for the U.S.
than global warming is.
Global climate change appears to be an example where a dissociation between the output of the analytic and the affective system results in less concern than is advisable, with analytic consideration suggesting to most people that global warming is a serious concern, but the affective system failing to send an early warning signal (Weber,
Global climate change appears to be an example where a dissociation between the output of the analytic and the affective system results in less concern
than is advisable, with analytic consideration suggesting to most people that
global warming is a serious concern, but the affective system failing to send an early warning signal (Weber,
global warming is a
serious concern, but the affective system failing to send an early warning signal (Weber, 2006).
I am also aware of how this may well mean that climatological models may well be predicting lower
global warming change
than in actually occuring, i.e. the
warming problem is more
serious than it appears.
A note came back from the Apollo 9 astronaut Rusty Schweickart, who has lately been pressing for the United States to intensify efforts to limit a danger both far more concretely understood
than global warming and far less in vogue as a
serious threat — the reality that a very large rock will inevitably head on a collision course for Earth.
The visuals are great, but I fear that it's just more hype for business purposes (PR) rather
than doing any
serious damage in the fight against
global warming.
-- Keep
global warming below 2oC, implying a peak in
global CO2 emissions no later
than 2015 and recognise that even a
warming of 2oC carries a very high risk of
serious impacts and the need for major adaptation efforts.
Global warming initially got a lot of publicity from a minor drought at the end of the 80's I believe (minor compared to the dust bowl years), since then there hasn't been much unusual drought wise in the US (ie the droughts that have happened have been even less
serious than the end of 80's situtation, let alone by comparison with the dust bowl years), but this hasn't exactly caused any problems.
The implicit assumption here is that the problem will turn out to be less
serious than the models predict; thus, any carbon we have chosen to leave in the ground out of fear for the consequences of
global warming will have gone uncombusted for nothing.
Clearly, however, far more
than a super majority of climate scientists consider
global warming to be potentially a very
serious threat; and among those who disagree, few (1.16 %) would consider such an outcome to be unrealistic.
Among Democrats, more
than eight in 10 say
global warming is a
serious problem, 65 percent want the federal government to do more about it and 57 percent believe most scientists agree on whether
global warming is happening.
While forecasting the state of the environment more
than 80 years into the future is a notoriously inexact exercise, academics gathered by the the United Nations at the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are concerned the world is headed for «extensive» species extinctions,
serious crop damage and irreversible increases in sea levels even before Trump started to unpick the fight against
global warming.
It was important in that it cast
serious doubt on the notion both of a
global Medieval
Warm Period
warmer than the 20th century and of a
global Little Ice Age, both long - time (cautiously) accepted features of the last 1,000 years of climate history.
However, the result is that while fully half of Democrats see
global warming as a
serious threat, this is true of less
than a third of Republicans.
Even with this increase over the last 11 years, the fact remains that still less
than a majority of Americans, at this point, believe
global warming will pose a
serious threat to them in their lifetimes.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Detailed new research into when
global warming will start to have a
serious effect on local climates has produced the shock finding that it could happen much sooner
than scientists have previously predicted London, 9 October — Catastrophic climate change may begin sooner
than anyone expected --- and the first place to feel the heat could be a small but important city in Indonesia.
A second, much more
serious, objection is that our forecasts for
warming impacts might be wrong, and
global warming could turn out to be substantially worse
than these models predict.
The Himalayas... provide more
than half of the drinking water for 40 % of the world's population... Within the next half - century, that 40 % of the world's people may well face a very
serious drinking water shortage, unless the world acts boldly and quickly to mitigate
global warming.»
«Gore has caused the spread of more pseudo-scientific incompetence on the subject of
global warming (I'm sorry — climate change)
than any climate scientist could possibly have ever accomplished... No
serious climate researcher — including the ones I disagree with — believes
global warming can cause colder weather.
That's one trillion dollars each and every year — the loss in annual revenue for the coal industry if the world takes
serious action to prevent
global warming, rather
than just continuing on in business - as - usual.
There is
serious probability of famines due to political mismanagement, far greater
than any alarmist catestrophic
global warming scenarios.
48 Growing Energy & Environmental Concerns 58 % of Americans rank «dealing with the nation's energy problem» as a top priority in 2006, up from 40 % in 2003 87 % of Americans cite home heating and energy prices as a «very big» or «big» problem for the nation's economy 88 % of US adults respond that «energy efficient» was very important in their electronics, appliance, lighting and heating / cooling equipment purchases Gallup polls: Americans» concerns about environmental issues have increased more
than 10 percentage points between 2004 and 2006 The LOHAS Consumer Report: 91 % of people are in total agreement with the statement «I care about protecting the environment» ABC News / Washington Post Poll: 79 % of Americans think
global warming poses a
serious threat to future generations Source: AP Source: NASA
More
than half identify
global warming as very
serious, and 23 % ranked it «extremely
serious,» after crime, the economy, and healthcare costs.
Not only have
global carbon emissions continued to rise 3 percent a year, but the science has made more clear that human populations and natural systems face
serious risk of substantial climate damage at
warming less
than 2 °C, they said.
He does not address the fact of
Global Change or its (
serious) implications, but asserts that there is not the public support for reacting to
Global Warming while pursuing truthiness, by distorting the issue, rather
than truth.
If
global warming continues as projected, the
global consequences of deteriorating conditions in the tropics will soon be a lot more
serious than a foretaste of summer weather in late winter.
And because heat can be stored in places other
than at the surface, a lack of surface
warming for a decade tells you almost nothing about the underlying long - term
warming trends... I judge that there is virtually no merit to suggestions that the «hiatus» poses a
serious challenge to the standard model [of human - caused
global warming].»
The BBC told us of Scientists» grim climate report, that «The risks from
global warming are more
serious than previously thought».