But, as Popper says, «a theory of the non-existence of consciousness can not be taken any more
seriously than a theory of the non-existence of matter.»
Not exact matches
If your scientists can't make the simplest form of life, and your neo-Darwinian evolution
theory is
seriously flawed, it would seem that your faith in blind chance should be much weaker
than it is.
Man U suffered more
than we did on the injury front — are we
seriously offering a
theory that United and Arsenal have got their training and physio work SO massively wrong and are totally clueless?
How
seriously you take something should in
theory matter less
than whatever that something actually is.
But models which modify Newtonian gravity in this way are difficult to take
seriously because theorists pluck them out of thin air, rather
than deducing them from a particular
theory of gravity.
Man Up!You can post links to
theories online that back up your claims of «Man Flu» being more intense
than a woman's equivalent, but
seriously?
This being the case, we should not base long - term policy on a
seriously flawed
theory that has more to do with feel - good Hollywood celebrity hypocrisy (think of Alphonse Gore)
than real science.