The vast majority of our cases are brought on behalf of organizations or individuals seeking to
serve the public interest rather to advance a private interest.
Not exact matches
Christians, as citizens, have an obligation to exert whatever influence they can to ensure that the mass media in our society operate to
serve the
public good
rather than merely commercial
interests or those of individuals.
The FT disapprovingly quotes our manifesto «The conservatives often talk about economic and social crises as if they are unavoidable, a law of nature... Conservatives have pursued a policy of blind faith in the market -
serving the
interests of the few
rather than the general
public...».
«SERAP believes that
rather than
serving the common
interest of the
public, spending over N1 billion possibly of
public funds on Zuma and Johnson - Sirleaf in the context of their participation in the opening of the Rochas Okorocha Foundation would seem to put Governor Okorocha in a conflict of
interest situation.»
Rather than encouraging researchers to take on problems that
serve the
public interest — a basic function of science and the fundamental reason that citizens support funding for science — Edwards believes those «perverse incentives» make researchers cautious and only concerned with their own
interests.
We're often accused of being hostile to the regular
public - school system, but our real gripe is with its near - monopoly — which leaves it free to keep on
serving the
interests of its «stakeholders»
rather than the students.
Rather than giving real power to the parents and kids
public education is supposed to
serve, they insist on keeping them subject to the authority of politicians and politically potent special
interests.
It is,
rather, a direct interference in the
public conversation in a way that
serves Exxon's
interest at the expense of the
public interest.
«The
public interest in securing the just, speedy, and inexpensive resolution of every proceeding would be
served in this case more fully by considering the merits of the asserted ground of unpatentability based on Hideji
rather than by denying consideration for reasons tied to Petitioner's previous failure to submit the requisite attesting affidavit.»
It betrays
rather than
serves the
public interest, and many people inside the system clearly know that, but hardly anyone has the courage to speak out about it.
Rather, I find that the balance of convenience lies with Toronto as the
public interest would be greater
served by granting interlocutory relief to Toronto.»
Civil Recovery powers may be appropriate where the evidence does not support a realistic prospect of conviction, or where the
public interest is better
served by a civil,
rather than criminal disposal.