Not exact matches
In effect, he turned the patriotic poster on its head, making it
serve in his novel not as a symbol of heroic national resolve but
rather of insidious government intrusion into the lives of its
citizens.
1) Charities spend their income on necessities, such as food and utilities, which ever - so - slightly re-orients our economy toward recession - resistant products,
rather than luxuries 2) Charities spend their money quickly, but on independent schedules, making for a smoother stimulus effect on the economy 3) Charities make purchases tax - free, meaning that $ 1 spent by a charity generates a full $ 1 of private economic activity; furthermore, much of those tax revenues are recovered as income tax on the grocery stores, utility companies, etc. that might not have received that income otherwise 4) Charitable giving is by far the most democratic way to improve society; from birth control to bombers, government assuredly spends money on something you don't like, and charitable giving restores your say - so 5) Charitable donations are tax deductible, meaning you keep those tax dollars in your local community 6) Charitable donations provide the funds necessary for volunteers to
serve the needy, thus giving «the average
citizen» a chance to meet and interact with the needy, breaking down stereotypes
Christians, as
citizens, have an obligation to exert whatever influence they can to ensure that the mass media in our society operate to
serve the public good
rather than merely commercial interests or those of individuals.
States, however, were not created to
serve the interests of all humanity, but
rather those of a particular community: its
citizens, or demos.
«It is only when people want to
serve themselves; they coerce
citizens to queue behind them through imposition
rather than selling themselves or their preferred candidates to the people who should have the ultimate power to elect or not to elect anyone as their leader in a democracy.
Rather than encouraging researchers to take on problems that
serve the public interest — a basic function of science and the fundamental reason that
citizens support funding for science — Edwards believes those «perverse incentives» make researchers cautious and only concerned with their own interests.
Rather they
serve as overarching guides to challenge educators to find consistency of expectation when we talk about delivering on our promise to the next generation of American
citizens.
«The Committee is concerned that these efforts to silence speech are based on political theater
rather than legal or scientific arguments, and that they run counter to an attorney general's duty to
serve «as the guardian of the legal rights of the
citizens» and to «assert, protect, and defend the rights of the people.