PIAC argued that the current voluntary data breach notification requirements are not
serving the public interest because companies are allowed to decide whether the scope of a data breach warrants notifying the public — an argument PIAC has been making since 2003.
Bringing different perspectives to governance
serves the public interest because it grows capacity from under - represented groups within the leadership of law societies.
Not exact matches
The television and cable industries, especially
because the broadcast spectrum and wiring systems are limited, have a special responsibility to
serve the
public -
interest.
At present, the most democratic constitution bill ever drafted is being held hostage by self -
serving politicians in the clearest possible demonstration of a fundamental principle of constitution - making — namely, that politicians should neither be tasked with drafting nor ratifying constitutions
because of the risk that they will act against the
public interest.
I don't think we should leap to the position, having said nobody is above the law, necessarily means everybody should be prosecuted,
because journalists do
serve the
public interest in what they do and that has to be preserved.»
It also
serves and protects the
public interest,
because standards developers accredited by ANSI must meet the institute's requirements for openness, balance, consensus, and other due - process safeguards.
In addition, the results are pragmatically important
because they
serve the
public interest: There is ample evidence that the
public is currently not being adequately informed about the risks from climate change, owing largely to flawed media coverage, to which blogs make a contribution.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the fierce competition, and the ethos we share, I have met scores of clever barristers who are motivated to
serve the profession in order to defend and enhance it,
because they believe it operates in the
public interest.
It is
because there's substance to my claim that the
public interest isn't being
served.
First, I'll say simply that I believe there's no justification for the monopoly granted to the law societies
because there's no quid pro quo, no requirement to
serve the
public interest at all.
Yet, the members who step up without being asked to
serve are often the most effective
because they already have an
interest in politics, government, or
public policy, GADs say.