Sentences with phrase «service content provider»

Rest assured that we are truly a full - service content provider.

If you have other writing needs, please keep in mind that we are a full service content provider, and that we will take on any project no matter how big or small.

Not exact matches

In addition to the company's news channel, the video service includes alternative networks and content providers such as Clubbing TV, FightBox, Newsmax TV, Heroes TV, and TWiT.

Cade's demands, which echo similar agreements in Chile and Mexico, aim to address concerns the resulting company could close off markets to rival content providers and television services.

The order also forbids preferential treatment of traffic, which could occur if a broadband provider also offers content or services that compete with services offered by smaller companies.

If the actual content provider — say, HBO, for example — isn't happy with the number of subscribers (and revenue) it's getting from a particular television provider, it may find it more worthwhile to go direct to consumers over the Internet through a Netflix - style streaming service.

Wheeler's «split the baby» approach to the contentious net neutrality debate, reported on over the weekend by the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times, would effectively reclassify Internet service providers as public utilities akin to the phone companies under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, but only in dealing with large content providers such as Netflix and Google's Youtube.

Hulu's close ties to content providers like Disney, Fox, Time Warner, and Comcast could give the streaming service a leg up in what is shaping up to be a competitive field.

Wheeler's new rules — which would prohibit blocking, throttling, or paid prioritization of internet content — would also reclassify broadband and internet service providers, or ISPs, as public utilities under Title II of the Telecommunications Act.

• GI Partners acquired a majority stake in Doxim Inc, a Canada - based provider of customer engagement and content management SaaS solutions for financial services organizations, from Strattam Capital.

Accessing all other video services did count against the limits unless the content provider paid extra.

Traditionally content providers such as Netflix or Yahoo have connected to broadband providers through intermediate networks, known as content delivery networks (CDNs), which transmit information in large, undifferentiated bundles to Internet service providers (ISPs), such as Verizon, who then funnel it to end customers.

Today, any major content provider that hasn't announced an over-the-top streaming service most definitely has one in the works.

The dispute centered on the interpretation of a 1998 U.S. law called the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, or DMCA, which protects internet service providers from liability when users upload copyrighted content, so long as they remove infringing material once they receive notice or otherwise become aware of it.

The order, put out in 2010, prevented Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from charging content providers more for expanded access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster downloaProviders (ISPs) from charging content providers more for expanded access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster downloaproviders more for expanded access to networks, or from charging consumers for faster download speeds.

The rewritten regulations prohibit Internet service providers, such as Verizon and Comcast, from blocking, prioritizing content or from creating fast and slow lanes based on a customer's willingness to pay for services.

Net neutrality is a concept stipulating that Internet service providers should enable access to all content and applications regardless of the source, and without favoring or blocking particular products or websites.

The company provides satellite communications services to broadcasters, content and internet service providers, mobile and fixed network operators, governments and institutions.

What we're really talking about with IP - specific advertising is geo - targeting: the method of determining the geolocation of a website visitor and delivering different content to that visitor based on his or her current location, such as country, region or state, city, or metro code or zip code; organization; IP address; internet service provider (ISP) or other criteria.

Those rules, voted for in 2015, mandated that internet service providers and mobile carriers can't provide so - called fast lanes to certain content — sometimes their own.

The Olympics are a great opportunity to engage a captive global audience that is hungry for games - related content, but to reach your target audiences, generate demand and grow revenue takes a bit of planning and working with the right localization service provider.

Perhaps even more worrisome for cable providers are services like HBO Now, which deliver what had been exclusive cable content directly to subscribers, and whose growth is also accelerating.

These protections sought to ensure that internet service providers treat web content equally and do not block or prioritize some content over others in return for payment.

Outgoing U.S. Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler warned Republicans against dismantling the Obama administration's landmark «net neutrality» protections that bar internet service providers from slowing consumer access to web content.

But the company said it still opposes the 2015 net neutrality rules, which prevent Internet service providers from blocking, slowing or otherwise discriminating against online content.

Google, the world's largest online ad provider, announced an update to its financial services policy earlier in March that will restrict advertising for «cryptocurrencies and related content» starting in June.

In essence, the FCC has given ISPs the legal power to blackmail any content provider that does not pay them with the threat of a slowdown in service delivery.

That followed an announcement a few weeks ago by AT&T that it was introducing a «sponsored data» feature for smartphones that would allow websites and online service providers to pay for exempting their content from users» monthly data caps.

Giant companies like Disney, Google or Netflix can handily afford to pay Internet service providers like Comcast and Verizon for special, faster lanes to send video and other content to their customers.

Net neutrality, or the notion that Internet service providers (ISPs) and governments should treat all online data equally, has raised many important considerations on whether the Internet should have so - called «fast lanes» that prioritize content based on the ability to pay — and «slow lanes» for providers who can't afford the special treatment.

They were intended to ensure a free and open internet, give consumers equal access to web content and prevent broadband service providers from favoring their own content.

Pai's proposal marks a victory for big internet service providers such as AT&T Inc, Comcast Corp and Verizon Communications Inc that opposed the rules and gives them sweeping powers to decide what web content consumers can get.

The rules prohibit internet service providers from blocking access to or charging extra to access certain data or content.

Last week U.S. President Barack Obama said Internet service providers should be regulated more like public utilities to make sure they grant equal access to all content providers.

FCC Chairman Ajit Pai, a Republican appointed by President Donald Trump, proposed in April to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband service providers sweeping power over what content consumers can access.

The senators had asked the agency whether the zero rating practices violated net neutrality rules, which prohibit Internet service providers from discriminating against any online content.

Pai, a Republican named by President Donald Trump to head up the FCC, unveiled plans last week to scrap the 2015 landmark net neutrality rules, moving to give broadband service providers sweeping power over what content consumers can access.

WASHINGTON, Nov 21 - The head of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission unveiled plans on Tuesday to repeal landmark 2015 rules that prohibited internet service providers from impeding consumer access to web content in a move that promises to recast the digital landscape.

Many saw little point in buying expensive new PCs and signing up with service providers to access content that was not only less secure but rarely French.

Under the framework, Internet service providers would be classified as an information service for consumers but a common carrier service for websites and content sites.

On Tuesday, telecommunications giant Verizon announced that it plans to buy AOL, which has in recent years transitioned from an Internet gateway to a provider of online video services, content, and most notably, online ads.

But many providers have relied until now mainly on users to flag content that violates terms of service.

They haven't been allowed to though, because of regulations protecting «net neutrality»: the fundamental principle that all content on the web should be treated the same by Internet service providers (ISPs), no matter what kind of data it is.

Whether simplifying OTT video delivery via innovative cloud and software - as - a-service (SaaS) technologies, or powering the delivery of gigabit internet cable services, Harmonic is changing the way media companies and service providers monetize live and VOD content on every screen.

Marketing, a provider of sales support content creation, marketing strategy, and P.R. services to companies across the United States.

On Wednesday, FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler proposed a new technology mandate that would require satellite and cable TV providers to disaggregate or separate their services so that a few companies could repackage them as their own without negotiating for content rights like everybody else in the market does today.

This struggle over whether internet service providers should enable equal access to all content and applications regardless of the source, without favoring or blocking particular products or websites, or alternatively be permitted to differentiate the price for some (e.g., high volume) users over others, has been around for some time.

«The acquisition of Broadcast.com is a natural extension of our strategy to deliver the ultimate experience to Web users and a powerful advertising and distribution platform for both companies» content, advertising and business services providers.»

The idea of offering fixed, mobile and content services all in one package is attractive to both providers and consumers and may drive more M&A activity.

Moreover, our use of Third Party Content shall not be construed as an endorsement by or affiliation with the Third Party Content providers and Franklin Templeton's products or services.