Sentences with phrase «services at reasonable cost»

Our HOA Law team provides a wide array of legal services at reasonable cost.

We offer family and civil mediation services at a reasonable cost, in addition to classes on communication for separated parents that help them focus on the best interests of their child (ren).

The capabilities of many apps and services have already far exceeded the ability of our mobile networks to deliver those apps and services at a reasonable cost (think Netflix (s nflx) on 4G tablet).

See my paper, «Access to Justice — The Unavailability of Legal Services at Reasonable Cost and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms» (a pdf file of 66 pages, on the SSRN (the Social Science Research Network)-RRB-.

Of assistance to such government and private intervention would be a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms argument, recognizing «legal services at reasonable cost» as a constitutional right.

(7) «Access to Justice — The Unavailability of Legal Services at Reasonable Cost and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms» (SSRN, August 29, 2013).

Otherwise the problem that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost will never be solved.

Or we can decide that today's rules should adapt to accommodate and direct the forces at bay in order to preserve the values of the American bar, which include the efficient delivery of services at reasonable cost.

This same technology can create several other support services, which together, would solve «the unaffordable legal services problem»: the majority of population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

The independence of Canada's law societies from government intervention has meant that their performance shows that they can not solve the problem, which is, «the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.»

Therefore they should not be used as a replacement for lawyers» providing fully competent and ethically provided full - retainer legal services at reasonable cost.

The fact that the majority of population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost will eventually result in these solutions: (1) the Ontario government establishing a competing string of law offices providing legal services at cost, thus reducing the law society's monopoly over the provision of legal services; and, (2) the right to legal services at reasonable cost becoming a constitutional right.

I've written several articles having the theme that instead of offering the residents of Canada alternative legal services, its law societies should be trying to solve the unaffordable legal services problem, i.e., that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

Ken you say, «instead of offering the residents of Canada alternative legal services, its law societies should be trying to solve the unaffordable legal services problem, i.e., that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.»

First, solve the problem that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

In today's economic condition, individuals and companies need excellent legal services at a reasonable cost.

We built our reputation by providing top quality legal services at a reasonable cost.

And now, more than ever, they need those services at a reasonable cost.

(12) In other words, the fact that this problem as to the «unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost» has been a serious one for decades, and is getting worse, puts the monopoly that lawyers have over the provision of legal services in need of a shared partnership with government - supported Legal Aid organizations, and legal expense insurance programs, that will: (1) bring legal services to the middle - income and poorer people at reasonable cost; and, (2) make the constitution of Canada an honest document.

[Part 1, last week, questioned the propriety of law societies» exclusive control of their monopoly over the provision of legal services, and their prosecution of offences of «the unauthorized practice of law,» given the many reports documenting the fact that the majority of the population can not afford legal services at reasonable cost, particularly so for litigation.

(9) Why have the many government - sponsored, law society -, and law school - sponsored reports that have analyzed this problem of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost not analyzed innovations like LAOLAW in depth?

CanLII can have little impact on the most serious problem now facing the legal profession and law societies in Canada & the U.S. — the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

Until the problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of legal services at reasonable cost» is solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or at the least such prosecutions... [more]

It is due to the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost.

Until the problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of legal services at reasonable cost» is solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or at the least such prosecutions should require approval by Crown counsel.

Unless support services methods of delivering legal services are adopted, government intervention is required so as to bring back legal services at reasonable cost to the residents of Canada.

Nor does it say that the FLSC is attempting to meet the problem head - on by way of a solution that will bring the middle and low income client back to lawyers» offices because legal services at reasonable cost can be developed.

So, let us demand that the FLSC be able to publish this, «CanLII support services solution to the problem of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost, before the end of September.

That failing is the cause of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost.

The precise statement of the nature and extent of the problem of unaffordable legal services is: «the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.»

The fact that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost is hardly a «gap» in the availability of legal services.

The abundant in - depth analytical literature provides this definition of the problem: «The majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.»

The duty to make legal services adequately available should be given constitutional status based upon a Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms s. 15 «equality rights» argument that recognizes, «legal services at reasonable cost» as a constitutional right, based upon the principle that being middle class, or of «middle income,» and unable to obtain legal services at reasonable cost, is a state of one's condition that is «immutable, or changeable only at unacceptable cost to personal identity,» and to one's ability to invoke constitutional rights and freedoms, and the rule of law.

The «cost of legal services» problem solved by LAO LAW for LAO, is a smaller version of, but exactly the same problem as, the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

The law societies do not give sufficient importance to the interactions among: (1) the problem and its consequences — the thousands of people whose lives have been damaged for lack of affordable legal services provided by competent lawyers; (2) the power of the internet, the social media, and the news media together, to make those consequences into a public and political issue so quickly that there will not be time for the law societies to publish a persuasive response, and which issue will compel government intervention by way of programs on the way to socialized law; (3) the fact that self - regulation of the legal profession has been lost by the law societies in several jurisdictions of the common law world and the U.S; [7] and, (4) the fact that the consequences of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost will motivate the many non-lawyer legal service providers to offer legal services that should be provided by lawyers, to people desperate for a lawyer's services that they can not afford.

(4) the taxpayers who finance the justice system whereat the legal profession, including benchers, earn an income that is considerably better than the average income of taxpayers, but the majority of those taxpayers can not have a lawyer who can provide legal advice services at reasonable cost.

They pay most of the taxes that support the justice system, but they can't make effective use of any of it because of the unavailability of legal services at reasonable cost.

The only solution that will bring back legal services at reasonable cost is the «support services» method of legal services delivery.

(2) such decades - long, weak, inadequate recommendations by the legal profession are good grounds for arguing that, «legal services at reasonable cost» is a needed constitutional right;

For more, see my other posts & comments on this «legal services at reasonable cost» problem — Ken Chasse, member, LSUC & LSBC.

The only justification for the «law firm as an investment vehicle» is the fact that law societies don't innovate so as to prevent majority populations from not being able to get legal services at reasonable cost.

All that has been written and said in relation to the «access to justice» problem — that is, the fact that the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost — fails to contain the necessary solution.

SEAACA promotes responsible pet ownership by providing educational information, insuring access to spay or neuter services at a reasonable cost and insisting people accept the fact their pets are members of the family.

SEAACA promotes responsible pet ownership by providing educational information, ensuring access to spay or neuter services at a reasonable cost and insisting people accept the fact their pets are members of the family.

We are committed to providing professional and caring services at a reasonable cost.

The best essay composing administration is one that ensures its work and offers their services at a reasonable cost.

StudentsAssignmentHelp.com is there to assist you with its custom essay help services at a reasonable cost.

The team of Assignment Help Experts at StudentsAssignmentHelp.com will help you in presenting the best normative economics assignment help services at a reasonable cost.

Also, if you are a management students you can hire our MBA essay writing services at a reasonable cost.

Meet Czech and Slovakian women, invite them for date a spend Prague offers world - class services at a reasonable cost.