Sentences with phrase «services in particular jurisdictions»

Not exact matches

Jurisdiction: This service is not targeted to users in a particular locality, nor is it intended to constitute the doing of business in any jurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation of business anywhere on behalf of Fertility Center of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any jurisdiction outside of the StatJurisdiction: This service is not targeted to users in a particular locality, nor is it intended to constitute the doing of business in any jurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation of business anywhere on behalf of Fertility Center of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any jurisdiction outside of the Statjurisdiction, nor to be a solicitation of business anywhere on behalf of Fertility Center of Las Vegas, nor to constitute any contacts with any jurisdiction outside of the Statjurisdiction outside of the State of Nevada.

VetLIVE.com, LLC makes no claim that the content of the Site, such as text, graphics, images, and information obtained from service providers and any other material contained on the Site (the «Content») is appropriate or may be downloaded in a particular jurisdiction.

Blue Buffalo does not represent or warrant that the Services or any part thereof or any products offered through the Services is appropriate or available for use in any particular jurisdiction.

With non-EU-domiciled defendants such as the Canadian Holdings, this turns on the UK Civil Procedure Rules, and in particular whether the court should order service of the proceedings on a defendant out of the jurisdiction.

However, the original proposals look set to be toned down, in particular the clauses which allowed Monitor to apply the Competition Act 1998 to publicly funded health services have been removed, although the Office of Fair Trading still has jurisdiction to apply the Act where appropriate.

com GLOBAL CARTEL REPORT: ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES REMAIN ACTIVE DESPITE NEARLY 50 % DROP IN FINES Produced by the firm's leading antitrust and competition team, the cartel report is a compre - hensive analysis exam - ining the following 2017 trends in antitrust compli - ance programmes and antitrust criminal liability: • A significant uptick in enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement ReporIN FINES Produced by the firm's leading antitrust and competition team, the cartel report is a compre - hensive analysis exam - ining the following 2017 trends in antitrust compli - ance programmes and antitrust criminal liability: • A significant uptick in enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Reporin antitrust compli - ance programmes and antitrust criminal liability: • A significant uptick in enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Reporin enforcement directed toward domestic cartels and individual criminal prosecutions • Continued scrutiny of the auto parts, financial services, and shipping in - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Reporin - dustries • A prioritization by more countries of anti-cartel enforcement, particular - ly in Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Reporin Asia • The expansion of glob - al authorities» extraterri - torial jurisdiction (Source: Morgan Lewis) Consistent with recent years, global enforce - ment authorities re - mained extremely ac - tive in 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Reporin 2017, opening many new investigations and advancing others, according to Morgan Lewis's latest Global Car - tel Enforcement Report.

[13] The Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board has limited jurisdiction to review the numbers of employees required to work in a given classification during a strike, but it has no authority to review whether any particular service is essential, which classifications involve the delivery of genuinely essential services, or whether specific employees named by the employer to work during the strike have been reasonably selected.

Prof. Conduct 123 (2001)(subject to the operational structure and content described in the opinion, a lawyer may affiliate with an online legal services website); Nebraska Op. 07 - 05 (lawyer may participate in internet lawyer directory which identifies itself as a directory, disclaims being a referral service and only lists basic information about lawyers without recommending specific lawyers and charges a reasonable, flat annual advertising fee); New Jersey Committee on Attorney Advertising Op. 36 (2006)(lawyer may pay flat fee to internet marketing company for exclusive website listing for particular county in specific practice area if listing includes prominent, unmistakable disclaimer stating the listings are paid advertisements and not endorsements or authorized referrals); North Carolina Op. 2004 - 1 (lawyer may participate in for - profit online service that is a hybrid referral service - legal directory, provided there is no fee - sharing with the service and communications are truthful); Oregon Op. 2007 - 180 (2007)(lawyer may pay nationwide internet referral service for listing if listing is not false or misleading and does not imply that the lawyer can represent clients outside jurisdictions of the lawyer's license, fee is not based on number of referrals, retained clients or revenue generated by listing and the service does not exercise discretion in matching clients with lawyers); Rhode Island 2005 - 01 (permitting website that enables lawyers to post information about their services and respond to anonymous requests for legal services in exchange for flat annual membership fee if website exercises no discretion over which requests lawyers may access); South Carolina 01 - 03 (lawyer may pay internet advertising service fee determined by the number of «hits» that the service produces for the lawyer provided that the service does not steer business to any particular lawyer and the payments are not based on whether user ultimately becomes a client); Texas Op. 573 (2006)(lawyer may participate in for - profit internet service that matches potential clients and lawyers if selection process is fully automated and performed by computers without the exercise of human discretion); Virginia Advertising Op.

In addition, 4autoinsurancequote.com does not represent or warrant that: (i) the operation of the Site will be error - free or uninterrupted; (ii) defects will be corrected; (iii) the Site, any emails sent by 4autoinsurancequote.com, or the server that makes the Site available are free of viruses or other harmful devices; (iv) the Site will be available to you or that you will qualify for products or services offered; (v) the materials in the Site will be accurate as of any particular date; or (vi) the products or services offered through the Site are available outside of the United States or in jurisdictions in which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licenseIn addition, 4autoinsurancequote.com does not represent or warrant that: (i) the operation of the Site will be error - free or uninterrupted; (ii) defects will be corrected; (iii) the Site, any emails sent by 4autoinsurancequote.com, or the server that makes the Site available are free of viruses or other harmful devices; (iv) the Site will be available to you or that you will qualify for products or services offered; (v) the materials in the Site will be accurate as of any particular date; or (vi) the products or services offered through the Site are available outside of the United States or in jurisdictions in which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licensein the Site will be accurate as of any particular date; or (vi) the products or services offered through the Site are available outside of the United States or in jurisdictions in which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licensein jurisdictions in which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licensein which 4autoinsurancequote.com is not properly licensed.

In particular, recognizing that we are subject to regulation as a money services business, we have registered with FinCEN as a money transmitter, and are actively seeking licenses from US State financial authorities to operate as a money transmitter within their jurisdictions.»

(1) Subject to this section, if, under the law of a participating State or a participating Territory, a court is empowered (whether generally or in particular cases) to make a community service order in respect of a person convicted of an offence against the law of the State or Territory, a court exercising jurisdiction in the State or Territory may, under paragraph 70NFB (2)(a) make a community service order.