Sentences with phrase «serving as a reviewer»
He currently serves as a reviewer for over 25 clinical and scientific journals; and he served (2001 - 14) as a reviewer for the United States Army Medical Research and Material Command (USAMRMC) on: 1.)
http://youthsportsoftheamericas.org/
She remains actively involved locally in the San Francisco Ob / Gyn Society and as a member of the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department at California Pacific Medical Center (a leading Bay Area hospital group) and serves as a reviewer for the journals Fertility and Sterility, Endocrinology and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
(OIG had recommended that the researchers be banned for 3 years from serving as reviewers or consultants to the agency.)
You should become familiar with the publishing standards in your discipline, acquire practice writing and submitting papers for publication and dealing with reviews, and take advantage of opportunities to serve as a reviewer.
Serving as a reviewer and editor for a scholarly journal in your field is a key step in the career progression of a research scientist.
Dr. Thrall also holds adjunct positions in the Graduate Research Program at Washington State University and regularly serves as a reviewer for panels for the National Institutes of Health in the area of proteomic and genomic analysis of the health effects of enviromental agents.
In 2014 & 2015, Dr. Coleman served as a reviewer for the DiverseScholar Science Communication (SciComm) Diversity travel fellowship.
Maureen has also served as a reviewer for ASPB journals, as well as a reviewer and editor for other society journals.
Eight schools received launch grants to support their opening this fall, and, in a smart new category of grants, 30 schools intending to launch programs in the fall of 2014 received funds to help them in their planning process (full disclosure: I served as a reviewer for the launch grants).
I've written previously about its role in creating proof points capable of scaling for the field that help propel the education system more toward a fully competency - based, student - centric one, and now NGLC is at it again (full disclosure: I serve as a reviewer for their grants).
Prior to serving as a reviewer for the U.S. Department of Education in the 2010 and 2012 Race to the Top competitions, he served on the department's Working Group for Postsecondary Linkage Efforts to Improve College Readiness and on the independent Annenberg Commission on Public Schools for their Institutions of Democracy Project.
For more information about manuscript submission or serving as reviewer, please email the editors at [email protected]
The editors would like to thank the 37,464 individuals who served as reviewers on the Nature journals during 2016.
Dr. Sobel has served as a reviewer of the journal Veterinary Surgery and has worked with many corporate and industrial colleagues on developing and marketing products for the veterinary endoscopy market.
In addition to his own work, he serves as a reviewer for several peer - reviewed journals in the area of veterinary dentistry and oral surgery.
He continues to serve as a reviewer for the Veterinary Surgery journal.
He has been published in numerous veterinary journals including Veterinary Clinics of North America, served as a reviewer for Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, and has lectured to both students as well as veterinary associations on various topics regarding diagnostic radiology.
He is busy putting the finishing touches on his paper and rounding up the usual suspects to serve as reviewers.
The site currently has more than a hundred scientists willing to donate their time and serve as reviewers.
When serving as a reviewer of a journal article I usually do not reveal my identity, but some people in my field choose to self identify on a regular basis.
If you are not able to serve as a reviewer during this period, we kindly ask that you unsubscribe from the mailing list at: http://www.joss.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/wg1-ar4-er
The majority of us have a Ph.D. and hold positions as professors at academic institutions where we teach about relationships, conduct and publish our own research findings in peer - reviewed academic journals, write books, and serve as reviewers or editorial board members for the major journals in our field.
The IJDS Board of Editors wish to acknowledge, with gratitude, the following scholars who served as reviewers for manuscripts submitted to the International Journal of Developmental Science.
Not exact matches
«Our reviewers found the technology to be unique and extremely innovative,» says Susan Windham - Bannister, a veteran life - sciences consultant who serves as the center's CEO.
Olson, a gifted communicator, would regularly serve as a Federalist Society speaker, even acting as their reviewer in chief after the Supreme Court wrapped up its session each June.
I think I'll add some tomato paste (as another reviewer did) and serve it tonight as chili with cheese and sour cream.
Instead of cutting the sugar, as another reviewer has said, we just served it in slivers.
Indeed, The New York Times book reviewer observed: «Here at last is what may serve as the first textbook for what should become a new sub-discipline; call it Alimentary History I.» Tannahill continued, «And it came to pass.
She is on the editorial board of the Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship and serves as an ad hoc reviewer for several other peer - reviewed research journals.
Because this is a Cuomo operation, two of the five guider - reviewers currently work for him (Secretary of State Cesar Perales and Commissioner RoAnn Destito of the Office of General Services) and a third, Bruce Katz of the Brookings Institution, served as his chief of staff at the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Your reviewer served as a Conservative Whip 1990 - 2001 but that was in opposition in a Parliament with a totally overwhelming Labour majority.
«Participants in the course had the chance to each write a paper, and we're working to get local peer reviewers who can give feedback and serve as mentors, and then create a joint publication that will illustrate their qualifications,» says Constantin Scherer, who organized the Science in Asylum project as part of his work at the Vienna - based Centre for Social Innovation.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), which serves as a kind of moral compass for scientific publishing (but has no authority to enforce its advice) has no guidance on the practice, but urges journals to vet reviewers adequately.
Justin Zhan, a computer science professor at North Carolina A&T State University in Greensboro, who serves as an ECR, adds, «if you don't even know what is a good evaluation, and what is needed from a reviewer's perspective, it's hard for early - career [researchers] to make a successful proposal.»
Anthony Cox, who also serves as the faculty chair of the Kelley Business of Medicine Physician MBA Program at IUPUI, says these high - trust consumers view misspellings as «errors of knowledge,» which they are willing to overlook, and typos as «errors of carelessness,» which erode their confidence in the reviewer.
In the event of a disagreement between the two reviewers, a third member reviewed the abstract or manuscript and served as a «tie breaker.»
He also can not serve as a peer reviewer or in any other advisory capacity to Public Health Service during that period.
«Such knowledge transfer is critically important in retaining the community's trust in NSF's merit review procedures and in recruiting others to serve the foundation as future staff, reviewers, and advisors.»
The bill language is ambiguous, calling for disclosure of «[t] he employer, and either the name and title or a unique identifier, of each individual who served as a peer reviewer for the grant program» during the previous 6 months.
May it serve as a warning not only to policymakers, but also to researchers, clinicians, peer reviewers, journal editors, and journalists of the need to consider the harm to scientific credibility and public health when dealing with studies funded by food companies with vested interests in the results — and to find better ways to fund such studies and to prevent, disclose and manage potentially conflicted interests,» writes Marion Nestle, Ph.D., M.P.H., of New York University, in a related commentary.
She serves as a peer reviewer for of many scientific journals and serves on numerous national and international committees and technical panels.
PNNL's climate experts have served as convening lead authors, lead authors, review editors and expert reviewers on IPCC reports.
Dr. Kreitzer serves as a regular reviewer for prominent scientific journals, including Nature, Neuron, Nature Neuroscience and Journal of Neuroscience, and is on the scientific advisory board of Circuit Therapeutics.
He serves as an advisor and reviewer for a number of domestic and international research centers, including NCI cancer centers.
He also serves as a peer reviewer for various scientific journals in the field of cancer research and immunology and as reviewer for grants in scientific review study sections of the NIH and National Cancer Institute (NCI).
He joined ASPB in 1990 and has served the Society on the ASPB Women in Plant Biology Committee, the Lawrence Bogorad Award Committee, and as a Monitoring Editor for Plant Physiology, as well as an ad hoc reviewer for Plant Physiology and The Plant Cell.
For the National Institutes of Health, he has served as an ad hoc and standing reviewer member for a number of grant review study sections.
He is also adjunct faculty in the department of genetics and department of epidemiology at the University of Alabama at Birmingham and serves as an ad hoc reviewer for more than a dozen scientific journals.
Glenda currently serves as a member of the International Traveling Workshop Faculty, and is an NCURA Peer Reviewer.
Dr. Evans serves on the editorial advisory board of Bottom Line / Women's Health and as a peer reviewer for Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine.