To counter this tendency we may on the other hand attempt to develop a more critical, descriptive, naturalistic account of the relation between mind and nature, thereby avoiding the purely logical demands of system and the self -
serving rule of reason.
Not exact matches
I have avoided the use
of this phrase here for two
reasons: (I) The popular understandings
of this phrase range from perfection on earth, to heaven, to the millenial
rule of Christ after the Second Coming, all
of which
serve to confuse the issue at question here.
To be sure, there are often good
reasons to place children out
of district at public expense — no district can
serve all students equally well — but neither are there always clear and obvious distinctions to be made between who can be educated in a regular school, those who need alternative settings and those like Adrian who run afoul
of the
rules so frequently, or who are penalized so often and systematically, that they simply give up and leave.
While the DOE's
reasoning for linking fuel stores to grid resiliency has been widely criticized for its vagueness and gaps in logic, its idea for a solution is clear: «full cost recovery» for those power plants now playing by the
rules of the energy and capacity markets run by interstate grid operators
serving about three - quarters
of the country.
The report was criticized for a number
of reasons including being
served beyond the timelines required under the
Rules of Court.
It can not be
ruled out that, even where there is no such impossibility, the transfer
of water may be regarded as satisfying the conditions mentioned in the preceding paragraph and, in particular, (i) the condition that it
serves a general interest and / or the benefits to the environment and society linked to the achievement
of the objectives set out in Article 4 (1)
of that directive are outweighed by the benefits to human health, to the maintenance
of human safety or to sustainable development resulting from the transfer
of water and (ii) the condition that the beneficial objectives pursued by that transfer can not, for
reasons of technical feasibility or disproportionate cost, be achieved by other means which would be a significantly better environmental option.
«For that
reason, Mississippi's adoption
of class action
rules would
serve no purpose,» wrote Kim.
As Professor Mary Liston has written: ``... skeletal, generic, boilerplate, formulaic
reasons can not
serve the function
of reminding the political, social and legal order
of the
rules of conduct we believe are necessary to regulate our activities.»
«An appraisal (i)
of the manner in which, and the apparent purpose for which rights, powers, duties and discretions are allocated by the contract; (ii)
of the contract's particular commercial or business setting, and (iii):
of the self -
serving actions lawfully open to a party both under, and not withstanding the contract will, as a
rule, indicate decisively whether the role and
reason of a party in the contract (or in a discrete part
of it) can properly be said to be to
serve his own interests, the parties» joint interests, or the interests
of the other party.»
In holding that the
Rule of Reason Test would apply, the court stated «if properly administered, membership requirements
serve pro-competitive purposes,» and «the Board's activities were not «plainly anti-competitive» and lacking in «any redeeming value.»»