Sentences with phrase «set by a court order»

Ted Michalos: So, the first thing everyone needs to understand is that support payments are generally set by a court order or by a divorce or separation agreement that you sign off on.

If alimony was set by court order, you'll need to file a motion to terminate alimony and properly serve your ex-spouse or her attorney of record.

A: Once the amount has been set by court order, the payor's employer can be served with a notice to withhold the child support, in which case the amount is withheld from the payor's wages and sent directly to the State Disbursement Unit which will then issue it to the payee (the parent who is receiving the child support).

Not exact matches

As written by the Express, the west London side insist that Costa is still their player and must return to the English capital in order to full - fill his contractual obligations, which the player claims went out the window after boss Conte told him that he was not part of the Italians plans for this season, with the two's battle set to be continued in High Court if peace can not be agreed between the two.

However, these present a rare opportunity for the US Supreme Court to overturn these kinds of orders, thus vacating the precedent set by the horrendous Korematsu decision (a decision so terrible that even Scalia spoke against it when he was still alive) and reversing the precedent set by upholding Executive orders like order 9066

A Federal High Court in Abuja on Wednesday has adjourned indefinitely a suit filed by a former Chairman of the House Committee on Appropriation, Abdulmumin Jibrin, seeking an order setting aside his suspension for 180 legislative days by the House of representatives.

The former National Security Adviser (NSA) Colonel Mohammed Sambo Dasuki (rtd) who is being unlawfully detained against court orders by Department of State Service (DSS) has approached the Court of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt orders by Department of State Service (DSS) has approached the Court of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa MCourt of Appeal Abuja Division praying the court to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt to set aside the subpoena issued against him by the federal high court to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Mcourt to appear before it to testify in a N400m corruption charges brought against Former National Publicity Secretary of the People's Democratic Party (PDP) Mr. Olisa Metuh.

The speech read by the Acting GOC at the inauguration of the court martial reads, «Following the directive from Army Headquarters (AHQ) that a standing General Court Martial (GCM) be set up for Op Lafiya Dole to try offences committed by personnel within the Theatre of Operation, I issued a Convening Order for a GCM on 5 August 2016 and the members were directed to assemble today at this venue for the formal inauguration of thecourt martial reads, «Following the directive from Army Headquarters (AHQ) that a standing General Court Martial (GCM) be set up for Op Lafiya Dole to try offences committed by personnel within the Theatre of Operation, I issued a Convening Order for a GCM on 5 August 2016 and the members were directed to assemble today at this venue for the formal inauguration of theCourt Martial (GCM) be set up for Op Lafiya Dole to try offences committed by personnel within the Theatre of Operation, I issued a Convening Order for a GCM on 5 August 2016 and the members were directed to assemble today at this venue for the formal inauguration of the GCM.

Nnamdi Kanu, director of Radio Biafra, has pleaded with Justice Adeniyi Ademola of the federal high court, Abuja, to set aside an ex parte order procured by the Department of State Services (DSS) to keep him in detention, and as such, grant him bail.

Lawyers for the former treasurer of former state Sen. George Maziarz's campaign committee have filed a set of amended spending reports with the state Board of Elections, as ordered by a state Supreme COurt justice.

The Federal High Court sitting in Awka presided over by Justice Muhammed Salihu, Friday, set aside the interim order made on Monday last week, which directed...

New court precedent has impacted the cases of New York lawmakers before: precedent set by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit eventually resulted in a new trial being ordered for Skelos» predecessor in the Senate, Joseph Bcourt precedent has impacted the cases of New York lawmakers before: precedent set by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit eventually resulted in a new trial being ordered for Skelos» predecessor in the Senate, Joseph BCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit eventually resulted in a new trial being ordered for Skelos» predecessor in the Senate, Joseph Bruno.

The formula was set up to address a decade - old court order known as the Campaign for Fiscal Equity that said the state was underfunding schools by billions of dollars.

Instead of some of my policies already being enshrined as precedent from being «blessed» by the courts, all of them would be up to be struck down (which is much tougher if they've already been set as standing precedent), which is why I referred to even laws as potentially being no more enduring than an Executive Order, under this scenario.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such preventive relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

(c) Within twenty days after the service upon any person charged under section 706 of a demand by the Commission for the production of documentary evidence or for permission to examine or to copy evidence in conformity with the provisions of section 709 (a), such person may file in the district court of the United States for the judicial district in which he resides, is found, or transacts business, and serve upon the Commission a petition for an order of such court modifying or setting aside such demand.

(a) Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that any person or group of persons is engaged in a pattern or practice of resistance to the full enjoyment of any of the rights secured by this title, and that the pattern or practice is of such a nature and is intended to deny the full exercise of the rights herein described, the Attorney General may bring a civil action in the appropriate district court of the United States by filing with it a complaint (1) signed by him (or in his absence the Acting Attorney General), (2) setting forth facts pertaining to such pattern or practice, and (3) requesting such relief, including an application for a permanent or temporary injunction, restraining order or other order against the person or persons responsible for such pattern or practice, as he deems necessary to insure the full enjoyment of the rights herein described.

By law, if a wage garnishment certificate for your funds is approved and ordered by a court, your employer will be required to set aside a predetermined amount of your wages for the IRBy law, if a wage garnishment certificate for your funds is approved and ordered by a court, your employer will be required to set aside a predetermined amount of your wages for the IRby a court, your employer will be required to set aside a predetermined amount of your wages for the IRS.

In the event the court of competent jurisdiction orders that the dog be returned to the owner, the owner shall be required to pay the kennel fee as set forth by animal control during the period that the animal was held.

Any settlement reached should be set down in a final order made by the Court within the divorce proceedings.

That's In the Matter of Section 53 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, C. S - 26 and in the Matter of a Reference by the Governor General in Council concerning the proposed Canadian Securities Act, as set out in Order in Council P.C. 2010 - 667, dated May 26, 2010 (33718)

However, in Robinson v Robinson (Disclosure)(1983) 4 FLR 102, CA Ormrod LJ said that while applications to set aside could be made by either a new action or an appeal to a higher court, there was much convenience in an application to the judge who made the original order who could determine the application and then make a new order if appropriate.

«We are pleased the court ordered the Department of Homeland Security to restore DACA under the same conditions set forth by a federal court in California,» said New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, one of the plaintiffs, in a statement.

Instead, the Illinois Supreme Court would sanction this circumvention of the tribunals set up to resolve internal church disputes and has ordered the Mother Church to reinstate as Bishop one who espoused views regarded by the church hierarchy to be schismatic and which the proper church tribunals have already determined merit severe sanctions.

At the same time, the Arbitration Law sets out the circumstances in which the courts may support and supervise the arbitral process by, for example, granting orders in relation to interim measures, the taking of evidence and staying court proceedings in favour of arbitration.

Nonetheless, the RTDRS has now been told by a Master of the Court of Queen's Bench that it has the jurisdiction and authority to hear applications to set aside its own orders and to schedule re-hearings (at paras 49 - 52).

Chris Morrison and Scott Frew successfully respond at the Ontario Court of Appeal on an Appeal by Wawanesa Mutual Insurance Company to set aside an Order for Summary Judgment.

An order made by a circuit judge sitting in the county court that a fact finding hearing should be undertaken by a family proceedings court was set aside on six grounds including that a transfer down of a discrete part of proceedings could not be permitted (see Re C (a child)[2008] All ER (D) 168 (Apr)-RRB-.

So the author is asking the Court of Justice of the EU to require the Italian courts to set aside M.A.S and M.B's human right to a fair trial, as guaranteed by the Italian Constitution, in order to pursue the policy goal of efficient tax collection, because, in the author's interpretation of global law, such efficient tax collection is also in the service of fundamental rights which Prof. Capaldo interprets as also present in the global legal order.

718 et seq. of the Criminal Code, R.S.C. 1985, c. C ‑ 46, and although the objectives set out in those sections guide the courts and are clearly defined, it nonetheless involves, by definition, the exercise of a broad discretion by the courts in balancing all the relevant factors in order to meet the objectives being pursued in sentencing.

The majority decision of the justice of the United Kingdom Supreme Court may be set to become the «final statement» on the presence of EU law in the UK constitutional order in both senses of the word: the Miller case may well prove to be chronologically the final time that the UK's highest court is called upon to interpret the nature of EU law before the United Kingdom's putative withdrawal from the European Union; in the other sense of the word, the dicta in the case may serve to be the final and definitive statement in an ongoing 40 year constitutional saga initiated by the United Kingdom's accession to the European Union's predecessor in Court may be set to become the «final statement» on the presence of EU law in the UK constitutional order in both senses of the word: the Miller case may well prove to be chronologically the final time that the UK's highest court is called upon to interpret the nature of EU law before the United Kingdom's putative withdrawal from the European Union; in the other sense of the word, the dicta in the case may serve to be the final and definitive statement in an ongoing 40 year constitutional saga initiated by the United Kingdom's accession to the European Union's predecessor in court is called upon to interpret the nature of EU law before the United Kingdom's putative withdrawal from the European Union; in the other sense of the word, the dicta in the case may serve to be the final and definitive statement in an ongoing 40 year constitutional saga initiated by the United Kingdom's accession to the European Union's predecessor in 1973.

(c) to improve the efficiency of the legal process by giving courts and spouses guidance in setting the levels of child support orders and encouraging settlement; and

While an order by the College's inquiry committee's under HPA s. 35 was initially been set aside by a judge of the B.C. Supreme Court, the B.C. Court of Appeal allowed the College's appeal.

The error by the lower court: The Court of Appeal decided that the judge below made errors when she set aside the order of the inquiry commicourt: The Court of Appeal decided that the judge below made errors when she set aside the order of the inquiry commiCourt of Appeal decided that the judge below made errors when she set aside the order of the inquiry committee.

The husband applied to the court for permission to appeal out of time and to set aside the consent order, arguing that the circumstances had been fundamentally and unforeseeably altered by the untimely death of his family.

However, it was upheld by the court and the order was set aside.

By shifting the meaning of «living tree» away from Canada's larger constitutional order to the text of the BNA Act itself, the Supreme Court fundamentally misapplied the ratio in Edwards and set Canada upon a path of judicial legislation.

(3) If a person having a duty to pay child support or spousal support under an agreement or order dies and the agreement or order is silent respecting whether the duty continues after the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate, (a) the person receiving support may make an application under section 149 [orders respecting child support] or 165 [orders respecting spousal support], and (b) if, on consideration of the factors set out in subsection (1) of this section, an order is made, the duty to pay child support or spousal support continues despite the death of the person and is a debt of his or her estate for the period fixed by the court.

Unlike a first - order case which may go by default, an uncontested appeal will still have to have some sort of a hearing; you are, after all, saying that a court decision should be set aside, and the Respondent's views are not necessarily relevant.

The B.C. Court of Appeal ruled in favour of Joseph Clements by setting aside the trial judge's order and dismissed Joan's action.

To prevent the judicial system from taking a role in setting educational spending priorities and remedies that could badly tilt educational priorities, the Province and the School Board asked the British Columbia Supreme Court for a judicial review of the Tribunal's decision or alternatively, to quash the remedial orders made by the Tribunal.

For X, it was submitted that the order for costs against the commissioners had been made by the tribunal, not the High Court, and that there was no authority in s 72 or elsewhere for a set off of a tribunal order against a county court judgCourt, and that there was no authority in s 72 or elsewhere for a set off of a tribunal order against a county court judgcourt judgment.

In a six to one jointly written decision (Moldaver, J. in dissent), the Supreme Court of Canada has answered the questions In the Matter of a Reference by the Governor in Council concerning sections 5 and 6 of the Supreme Court Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. S - 26, as set out in Order in Council P.C. 2013 - 1105 dated October 22, 2013 2014 SCC 21 as follows:

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal by a majority of three to two, reversing the High Court and Court of Appeal decisions which had set aside arbitral orders in the appellant's favour.

The agreement or court order of appointment specifies how the fee is split and it may be re-apportioned by the Parenting Coordinator between the parents if that is set out in the authorizing document.

This decision made in respect of a failure of lawyers to file a costs» budget — the opportunity to claim costs was effectively lost at the outset of the litigation by the failure to submit the costs» budget — is the touchstone for legal advisers and their clients in understanding the attitude of the courts to failure by a party to adhere strictly and accurately to the requirements of case management set out in the rules, practice directions, and the tailored orders of the court in the individual case.

«Stephen is a leader in the field of Freezing Injunctions... In order to understand what is required for a Without Notice Freezing Injunction, Stephen's experience is unparalleled, to the point where the Judges rely on his previous cases to determine the standards set by previous Courts.

A Notice of Appeal puts the judge and the Arizona Court of Appeals on notice that a party intends to have the Arizona Court of Appeals review the judges orders and decisions in hopes some decisions can be set aside by the Arizona Court of Appeals.

The factum must not be subject to any limitation on access by court order or law, or as set out in paragraph 3.4 of this policy.

Notable mandates: Represented physicians involved in providing care to Ashley Smith during the 2013 coroner's inquest; acted for Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne in a defamation action against Ontario Progressive Conservative party leader Tim Hudak and energy critic Lisa MacLeod; in Wise v. Iran, acted for a Canadian victim of a suicide bombing (executed by individuals who received material support from Iran) who sought leave to intervene in ongoing proceedings commenced by United States plaintiffs in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repCourt of Justice seeking orders recognizing the enforceability in Ontario of judgments they obtained from a U.S. court against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert repcourt against Iran totaling about $ 370 million; in Khadr v. Edmonton Institution, acted as lead counsel for an intervener, the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to argue that in interpreting Omar Khadr's sentence for the purpose of enforcing it in Canada, Correctional Services Canada was obliged to consider Khadr's right to liberty and principles of fundamental justice; acted for a physician in a malpractice claim in Moore v. Getahun, a precedent - setting case about restrictions on communication between counsel and experts in preparation of expert reports.