Not exact matches
After all,
standards set in California — the eighth - largest economy in the world on its own — are often adopted at the federal level, ranging from emission
standards for vehicles to efficiency
settings for
appliances.
•
Sets a goal to reduce carbon pollution by at least 3 billion metric tons cumulatively by 2030 — more than half of the annual carbon pollution from the U.S. energy sector — through efficiency
standards set over the course of the Administration for
appliances and federal buildings;
The scoop on energy efficiency
standards Federal attempts to regulate consumer
appliance efficiency started with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975, which established
appliance efficiency targets, but did not
set efficiency
standards.
Proposed actions include the development and finalization of EPA
standards that
set limits on carbon emissions for both new and existing power plants, improved energy efficiency
standards for buildings and
appliances, and increased deployment of renewable energy.
DOE has already completed 29
sets of
standards for various equipment,
appliances and building codes, with dozens more coming, and so we used the emissions difference between EIA's Reference and «Extended Policies» projections.
(Sec. 213) Amends the EPCA to: (1) revise the definition of «energy conservation
standard» to include energy efficiency for certain covered equipment, water efficiency for certain covered equipment, and both energy and water efficiency for certain equipment; (2) allow the adoption of consensus and alternative test procedures for purposes of the Energy Conservation Program for Consumer Products Other Than Automobiles; (3) require the Secretary to prescribe a new test method for televisions; (4) expand the list of criteria for prescribing new or amended energy conservation
standards, including requiring Energy Guide labels to include the carbon output of each covered product; (5) require manufacturers of covered products to submit annual reports and information to DOE regarding compliance, economic impact, annual shipments, facility energy and water use, and sales data that could support an assessment of the need for regional
standards; and (6) require state and local building codes to use
appliance efficiency requirements that are no less stringent than those
set by federal
standards.
The federal government currently
sets baseline efficiency
standards for
appliances for sale in the United States, which means that none of the products on the market are «inefficient.»
The four policies included in the plan are:
setting a state energy savings target of 1.5 % per year, implementing updated national model building codes, constructing economically attractive combined heat and power facilities, and adopting
standards for five
appliances.
In this system, the most efficient
appliances today
set the
standard for those sold tomorrow.