; e) how to address the complex undertaking of
setting emissions caps for developing countries, which must be linked to future, unobserved levels in comparison with the historically observed levels for industrialized countries?.
If you just talked about
setting emissions caps without associated policies, everybody would clamor for getting increased efficiency of markets and trading included.
We learned Australia must
set emissions caps that rapidly reduce toward zero to decarbonize the economy as fast as possible, enforced in a way that does not limit ambition.
Not exact matches
Jack Layton and the NDP are campaigning on a
cap - and - trade program, which would
set a $ 35 per tonne price on carbon and
cap emissions from large industry.
He noted the federal - provincial climate agreement will limit any impact on greenhouse gases because Alberta has
set a
cap on oil sands
emissions.
Before Cuomo took office, New York joined eight other northeastern states (Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island and Vermont) to
set a
cap on carbon dioxide
emissions within the region.
As compensation, the transport secretary said the government would push for a European
cap on aviation
emissions,
set below current levels.
«With this proposal, New York will lower the
emissions cap even further and
set the precedent for recognizing and taking action against climate change to support the future of communities across the globe,» said Governor Cuomo.
Instead, they argue that Australia should base its climate policy on a carbon budget that
sets an upper limit on the country's total
emissions between now and 2050, institute a
cap - and - trade scheme, consider closing selected coal - fired power plants, and ramp up renewable energy.
Under a
cap, government
sets a limit on total carbon
emissions and issues tradable permits up to the limit.
China has not yet
set a national
cap on its greenhouse gas
emissions, citing the need to grow its economy.
Seven provinces and cities in China are to
set caps on their greenhouse gas
emissions, following a directive from central government.
The
cap would be
set, ideally with expert scientific consultation, to make an appropriately deep cut in total CO2
emissions.
Soon after Barack Obama was elected president, congressional climate change advocates
set their sights on passing a
cap - and - trade bill in time for him to bring a firm U.S.commitment on
emissions reductions to this week's climate meeting in Copenhagen.
Several bills pending in Congress would
set a so - called
cap - and - trade policy under which an overall limit on pollution would be
set — and companies with low output could sell their allowances to those that fail to cut
emissions as long as the total stays within the total pollution
cap.
After years of procrastination, the aviation industry is
set to agree to
cap its
emissions from 2020.
A deal this fall to
cap carbon
emissions from global aviation at 2020 levels must be enforceable and
set long - term goals in line with the 2015 Paris agreement on climate change, a coalition of environmental groups said.
The new agreement will likely lead to a future
set of limits allowing Kyoto parties to keep on
capping greenhouse - gas
emissions and trading carbon credits.
Anti-regulatory blogs and commentators and the McCain - Palin campaign made a push to publicize a 10 - month - old comment by Senator Barack Obama about the high cost of coal burning if and when a hard
cap is
set for carbon dioxide
emissions.
That's the optimistic opinion put forth by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi — she issued that statement as Congress
set about the «mother of all climate weeks» to debate revolutionary climate and energy legislation that could potentially land the US a
cap and trade system to cut nationwide carbon
emissions.
More importantly, the Climate Security Act of 2007 (Lieberman / Warner bill) is currently in mark - up and exempts co-ops from the
cap - and - trade decreasing carbon allocations by
setting their
emissions at 2006 levels until 2035 and then allowing them to sell or trade their
emission credits.
As signs grew that the Senate was in no mood to
set up a trading system for curbing carbon dioxide
emissions, as I noted how the climate policy debate had circled back lately to the
emissions -
capping plan for power plants that had been proposed in the 2000 Bush campaign for the presidency, I found myself thinking about the vacuum that's persisted where President Obama should have been on this issue (if he planned to live up to his campaign commitments).
Set up a global
cap and trade system for greenhouse gas
emissions --- all greenhouse gas
emissions from all sources.
Three issues: * how do you ensure the «
cap» is
set at a reasonable level that assures we reduce
emissions fast enough?
Actual
emissions caps would be
set to account for different air quality needs in the East and West.
Unlike existing
cap - and - trade program designs, a «pre-pay» system has no need for
setting rules about allocating
emission allowances, banking / borrowing of allowances, and the use of offsets.
But the US could pick a
cap and
set it low to «make itself» cut
emissions.
The bill would
set up a
cap - and - trade system to achieve the
emissions targets, allowing industry and other entities to buy and sell permits within an overall
emissions ceiling.
For example, nine states in the Northeast, as part of a regional
cap - and - trade program that
sets overall limits on carbon and then allows states to trade permits to pollute, have committed to cut
emissions by 45 percent during the next year and by another 2.5 percent a year after that until 2020.
The need for more harmonisation is clearest with respect to how the
cap on overall
emission allowances is
set.
If the overall
cap for any year is
set below the level of
emissions last year, on a downward trajectory compatible with stabilizing concentrations at a safe level, reserving some credits for new entrants would force other firms to bid for fewer permits, raising prices and increasing the number of mitigation activities that are worth undertaking.
Yet RGGI hasn't induced a robust enough carbon price to drive down
emissions, primarily because the initial
emissions «
cap» was
set 45 % higher than actual
emissions by the covered power plants and wasn't tightened enough to actually «bind» until four years later.
This
sets in train a process that could potentially lead to a
cap on the number of allowances dealt on the EU
Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) aligned with the objective of keeping global warming «well below 2C».
The availability of verified
emissions data has allowed the Commission to ensure that the
cap on national allocations under the second phase is
set at a level that results in real
emission reductions.
The government
sets a fixed limit or
cap on the amount of
emissions that polluters can emit in, say, a year.
Julie Tighe, DEC Chief of Staff, said that «
emissions from the power sector in New York have fallen more than 50 % since the states agreed to
set the
cap in 2005.»
It
sets a
cap on carbon
emissions which is reduced over time.
In 2020 the shipping industry is facing its biggest challenge in a century as the IMO is
set to impose a new 0.5 % sulfur
cap on marine fuel
emissions.
«We can't
set caps for unpredictable and hard - to - quantify fugitive
emissions,» she adds.
And President Barack Obama has called for a national
cap - and - trade system that would set greenhouse - gas emission limits for many businesses and require those that exceeded them to buy allowances from others that haven't (see Chu's Wish List: Cap - and - Trade and Cheaper Sola
cap - and - trade system that would
set greenhouse - gas
emission limits for many businesses and require those that exceeded them to buy allowances from others that haven't (see Chu's Wish List:
Cap - and - Trade and Cheaper Sola
Cap - and - Trade and Cheaper Solar).
Includes provisions: (1) creating a combined energy efficiency and renewable electricity standard and requiring retail electricity suppliers to meet 20 % of their demand through renewable electricity and electricity savings by 2020; (2)
setting a goal of, and requiring a strategic plan for, improving overall U.S. energy productivity by at least 2.5 % per year by 2012 and maintaining that improvement rate through 2030; and (3) establishing a
cap - and - trade system for greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions and
setting goals for reducing such
emissions from covered sources by 83 % of 2005 levels by 2050.
Proposition 23, the ballot initiative to freeze the California law
setting a
cap on greenhouse gas
emissions, was defeated on Tuesday, with the «No» vote estimated at 59 percent.
The EU has long led the way on carbon
emissions, implementing a
cap and trade system in 2005, having
set ambitious
emissions reductions targets, having per person
emissions that are less than half of those in the USA, Canada, and Australia, and which in general has been the global model on climate policy.
The Chinese government has already
set out ambitious plans to cut the country's reliance on coal — an additional
cap on CO2 suggests the country's leaders are serious about tackling their
emission problem,» he said.
Others have
cap - and - trade systems where the governing body
sets a gradually reducing limit on
emissions covered by the scheme, and let the market
set the price.
A
cap - and - trade system
sets an upper limit, or
cap, on
emissions that declines over time in order to drive the amount of greenhouse gases pumped into the atmosphere.
To enable trading, rules are established that allow those entities with
caps to meet their obligations either by purchasing unneeded allowances from others that have
caps, funding projects that reduce
emissions at places under the control of others, or purchasing off -
sets created by carbon reduction projects somewhere in the world.
It is true that an
emissions cap policy — which, in essence, is what Allen is proposing — would
set a clear path to climate stability, compared to the alternative of a carbon tax.
A carbon tax, by contrast, does not
set a
cap on
emissions, but rather
sets a price to penalize carbon dioxide
emissions.
In May 2016, the courts found that Massachusetts law unambiguously directs the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to
set sector - specific, declining
emissions caps which lead to an aggregate 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gas
emissions by 2020.