Sentences with phrase «settle on a consensus»

Of course, someone might say that the academy — for the first time since scholasticism was eschewed — really had settled on a consensus.

We know that most users will research multiple sites before the settle on a consensus.

Not exact matches

Apple has not disclosed Watch sales figures — either in dollar values or unit shipments — but Wall Street analysts and other dedicated Cupertino Kremlinologists have generally settled on a back - of - the - envelope consensus of slightly over $ 1 billion.

The general consensus has settled on the Bulls as the second - best team in the conference and that's the one that makes the most sense.

What results can general consensus settle on as bad enough?

In your comment, you cite at least three points which are not settled, and on which medical consensus has reversed itself at least twice that I can remember, and with which most of the «regulars» disagree.

Our legal practices actually point in two directions - an anti-discrimination direction and a religious liberty direction - and I don't think our society has a settled consensus yet on just how these are best balanced.

In settling on an interim arrangement, the Assembly Democrats are declaring they were unable to reach consensus on a permanent speaker.

In 2015, Huelskamp revealed to the Huffington Post that he thought the science surrounding climate change was not «settled,» stating «I don't think there's a scientific consensus on that.»

that he thought the science surrounding climate change was not «settled,» stating «I don't think there's a scientific consensus on that.»

This year the consensus never settled on two particular films.

In 2015, Huelskamp revealed to the Huffington Post that he thought the science surrounding climate change was not «settled,» stating «I don't think there's a scientific consensus on that.»

that he thought the science surrounding climate change was not «settled,» stating «I don't think there's a scientific consensus on that.»

In today's post, I suggest the late Dr Stephen Schneider provided the recipe in mid 1996 on exactly how this could be done — question their associations, suggest they don't deserve fair media balance because of that, and emphasize the settled consensus about global warming.

As their results clearly show, the climate science is far from being «settled» and the «consensus» on AGW is non-existent.

Only denialists and contrarians act as if that lack of consensus on one issue, means that strong scientific evidence has not settled a different issue:

The science may be settled that man - made emissions have had some impact on the earth's temperature, but the consensus stops there.

On the other side of the coin, some actively engaged online «realists» exploit the ambiguity of the term «consensus» to translate a strong prevalence of shared opinions among climate science experts that continued and increasing aC02 emissions pose a potential risk, to give the public an impression that «CAGW» is «settled science.»

I suspect because probably they know that there is a strong prevalence of agreement among experts that continued and increasing aCO2 emissions pose a potential threat, but they find that «consensus» to be politically inconvenient because they don't want to accept the political associations with accepting that threat, so instead they focus on a red herring of a more politically convenient target of whether expert climate scientists agree that «CAGW» is «settled science»

The global warming doomsday scientists have relied on a compliant mainstream media to claim that their opinions represent the supposed 97 % of settled science - an indisputable «consensus» that should not be debated.

Gavin Schmidt can parse his words and insist on his «interpretation» as much as he wishes but his meaning is absolutely clear — despite his «uncertainty» post made after «climategate» had outed him: that global warming is happening, that this is caused, in the main, by human made GHGs, that, if mankind does not halt these GHGs, catastrophe will follow and that this is «settled science» and the «consensus».

So Gavin doesn't understand how this is read as him saying there is a consensus, that science is settled on the «A» in (C) AGW??

Their so - called consensus on global warming is scientifically irrelevant because science isn't settled by popularity.

ROY SPENCER (University of Alabama professor): Politicians and some of the scientists like to say that there's a consensus now on global warming, or the science has been settled.

The «consensus» is a media invention, there is no scientific consensus on AGW Theory, and anyone who claims the sience is settled on AGW is in the relm of DOGMA not science.

If you have a field where consensus is weak, that implies they haven't settled on much that is useful just yet.

He also declined to comment on whether the consensus to settle was unanimous.

Statistics indicate a general consensus that women drivers are safer bet on the roads, yet the individual driving records settles upon the premium amounts.

Though the group started with the intent to declare a loose consensus to the wider global bitcoin community, it ultimately settled on less concrete goals, such as having core developers engage with the China - based community on its popular WeChat forums.