But, extreme awards drive up the costs of litigation and produce pressure on corporations to
settle weak cases rather than run the risk of out - of - whack punitive damages.
Not exact matches
Cases have been
settled with consent decrees, decrees that many criticized as too
weak.
It is not universally the
case that an employer
settles because they believe they have a
weak case.
A major secondary benefit is that, even if the
case does not
settle, the ENE process may narrow the issues and divert focus and attention away from
weak or inconsequential points towards the more important aspects of the
case.
I suppose there could be valid reasons why 4 out of every 5 jury verdicts go in favor of the doctor or hospital — maybe the strongest
cases are all being
settled before trial, leaving only the
weakest cases behind — but it's hard to say that with a straight face when those figures mean that malpractice defendants have better odds winning in a courtroom than the odds a casino has winning its own games.