Sentences with phrase «settled by the insurer»

This is because, though you get a fair idea with CSR about the number of claims settled by an insurer in one particular year, it's still doesn't give you any clear idea on why other claims were rejected.

Check the claim settlement ratio a measure of the claims settled by the Insurer to the claims made which should be over 90 %.

Claim settlement ratio is the number of claims settled by the insurer over the total claims it receives.

If a test is done at empanelled hospitals or centers, the customer is not asked to pay anything as all charges are settled by the insurer as per the agreed rates.

This critical information bucket summarizes the percentage of individual death claims that are actually settled by the insurer.

Not exact matches

The move struck observers as odd because most plaintiffs seeking damages usually hope to settle the case by leveraging the deep pockets of an insurer.

However, eight of those reasons were circumstances that arose after the commencement of the action and were thus irrelevant to the analysis (the defendant's offer to settle; the defendant's failure to apply to move the action to the Small Claims Court; the defendant's denial of liability for the plaintiff's injury; the insurer's characterization of the collision as low impact; the exchange of 60 documents; the defendant's motion for a Rule 66 hearing and eventual removal; a Rule 28 examination of a witness; and the absence of expert evidence tendered by the defendant).

A woman who was injured in a serious accident and who had been denied a catastrophic determination by her insurer for 2 years settled her arbitration with an admission that she was catastrophically injured.

I understand that by settling now, my tort claim may now be of no value since even if my case «crossed the threshold», I would be required to give credit for weekly indemnity payments made by the accident benefit insurer.

I agree to settle at this time in order to obtain a lump sum payment in order that I need not become compelled to attend on assessments, medical appointments, and participate in rehabilitation programs mandated by the accident benefit insurer and to avoid the risks of proceeding to arbitration.

By the same token, a policyholder is also afforded latitude to press an insurer to settle, without jeopardizing her position on coverage on the grounds of non-cooperation in the defence.

A refurbishment contract entered into by the insured led to arbitration which the insured settled without the insurer's authority on the basis of a «cap and collar», capping the award if the claimant was successful and agreeing to a payment of USD2 million if the claim failed.

Sometimes the caller has been approached by the insurer soon after the wreck and they want to settle out case; usually for $ 500.

Many people don't know this, but insurers are required by law to attempt to settle a motor vehicle accident claim as quickly as possible.

Yes, by the time the case had reached the Court of Appeal the second time, the original plaintiff had no interest in the litigation — she and Mr. Poole had settled, and the action again the Li's has been resolved — and the fight was between Mr. Poole and the firm's insurer.

Urged to settle by a desperate client, lawyers will take what they can get on a rush basis from the insurer instead of taking the time to properly investigate and «work up» the accident benefits claim by engaging the expertise of the appropriate medical practitioners.

The insurer will have to settle claims within 30 days of filing by NPCI.

However, if you prefer cash settlement, replacement or repairs you can still try to negotiate with your insurer providing them with reasons why for example, it would be better to cash settle with you since there have been so many attempts already by them to repair, ample money already wasted doing so and the underlying problem is unlikely to ever be resolved so more money would be wasted for no good reason.

After an agreement being complete between the insurer and the insured regarding the amount of claim, the claim shall be settled by the company.

«The insurer simply does not want to pay so is making excuses», «my insurer took almost six months to settle my claim», «it was really cumbersome and painful to claim insurance», are some of those grievances expressed by policy holders when submitting a claim.

They are a form of indemnity policies whereby claims are settled through tie - ups with hospitals or by submitting hospitalisation bills to the insurer for reimbursement.

• Compare the insurer's claim settlement practice — the true test of the best car insurance policy is the ease with which claims are settled by the insurance company offering the said policy.

In case of death of insured during the policy term the insurer settles the claim by paying Sum assured along with bonus.

For cashless claims, the claim settled by the first insurer will be cashless.

All health insurance policies list a network of hospitals where the policyholder can pay the medical bills and have it reimbursed by the insurer, or opt for cashless treatment, where the insurance company settles the bill directly with the hospital.

Adding to this fact, an official from a famous private insurance company aid that since April there has been a downfall in rupee by 20 %, whereas, the claim cost for insurers have elevated as they are generally settled in dollars.

Claim Settlement Ratio is the time taken by an insurer to settle down the claimsfromits clients.

In simple terms, the number of policies settled or paid the sum assured to the family of insurer is measured by this parameter.

Number of death claims settled and reported are for all types of life insurance policies (be it a term plan, saving plan, investment plan, etc.) sold by the insurer collectively.

The Claim Settlement Ratio refers to the percentage of the total number of claims settled and resolved in a certain year to the claims that have been received by an insurer in a year.

The ratio is arrived by dividing the total number of death claims received by the insurer to the total number of them the insurance company has settled.

As the insurer did not settle the claim, she approached the Bellari District Forum by filing a complaint against NEKRTC and Bajaj Allianz.

After reviewing the evidence presented to the jury, the Texas Court of Appeals, Third District, the court decided that although there was some evidence that the insurer had breached its fiduciary duty by failing to promptly settle for the full amount of the owners» claims, it determined that the insurer hadn't violated the Texas consumer fraud statute and knowingly engaged in deceptive acts.