On the other hand, highly investment - oriented products will typically have better claim
settlement since the death benefit is a small component of the entire package.
Not exact matches
Alternatively, if it is determined that the policy has real economic value to keep, the advisor and client should consider whether it makes more sense to simply keep the policy to benefit directly from the long - term value of the
death benefit, rather than sell as a life
settlement (
since by definition, if it's valuable to a buyer to purchase, it's valuable to the seller to keep it!).
With this type of law, there are fewer cases having to be seen by the courts
since determination of the cause of the accident is removed except in major accidents with
deaths or large
settlement costs.
Ironically, the biggest caveat of engaging in a life
settlement is the reality that any life
settlement policy worth selling to an investor is worth even more in the long run for the policyowner to just keep themselves, where the internal rate of return will be even more appealing (
since the investor has both transaction costs to acquire the policy, and does not enjoy the
death benefit tax free as the original policyowner would).
I have shortlisted Birla and Max Life because of their low premium and high claim
settlement ratio and HRFC click to protect
since I can buy accidental
death / disability rider by paying extra premium but then it is going out of my budget.