Sentences with phrase «several skeptical science»

In 2012, several Skeptical Science contributors teamed up with John Church to publish a paper (Nuccitelli et al. 2012) in response to a flawed publication by Douglass & Knox (2012).

Not exact matches

As far as the time delay issue is concerned, I'll once again quote from the Skeptical Science post: «The reason the planet takes several decades to respond to increased CO2 is the thermal inertia of the oceans.»

By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley About 18 months ago, as soon as I heard of Dr. Richard Müller's Berkeley Earth Temperature project, I sent an email to several skeptical scientists drawing their attention to his statement that he considered his team's attempt to verify how much «global warming» had occurred since 1750 to be one of the most important pieces of research ever to be conducted in the history of science.

The volunteers at Skeptical Science, along with staff at the University of Queensland, have been busy over the past several months putting together a Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) on climate change.

I've been volunteering with Skeptical Science for several years.

The Skeptical Science team published several high - impact papers this year, starting with the Cook et al. (2013) consensus paper, co-authored by nine Skeptical Science volunteers.

Were Rose and Curry Skeptical Science readers, they would have known several days prior to the publication of this article that the claim about global warming «pausing» in 1997 was pre-bunked by Nuccitelli et al., as Figure 3 clearly shows.

In 1991, Western Fuels, a $ 400 - million coal consortium, declared in its annual report it was launching a direct attack on mainstream science and enlisting several scientists who are skeptical about climate change — specifically Drs. Robert Balling, Pat Michaels and S. Fred Singer.

Whitehouse makes several points that seem to originate from Skeptical Science, like The Escalator steps.

In the afternoon, we were expected to be at our posters for at least 90 minutes between 15:30 and 17:00 and this was a good opportunity to talk with several people about Denial101x specifically and Skeptical Science in general.

RW has been asking much the same questions over at Skeptical Science for some time now (several threads covering hundreds of responses).

I come into contact with a wide variety of applied science practitioners of many disciplines including biologists, engineers of several flavors, chemists, etc. etc. and I only know one that is not basically what I believe is termed a «lukewarmer» and the one person (professional) that's not skeptical is a environmental scientist (and he debates like a wet noodle, all he'll say is most climatologists agree.....

There are several posts on Skeptical Science (also check the «argument» page and recent archives), with links to published papers, as well.