Sentences with phrase «several different arguments»

Staying true to his word, Andresen proceeded to publish a slew of posts addressing several different arguments against raising the limit.

Talbots tried several different arguments to get around the exclusions, but none of them worked.

But 24 articles in 18 different journals, collectively making several different arguments against global warming, expose that claim as false.

Not exact matches

These contrasting positions are, of course, simply the echo of views that have contended with each other at different points in Christian history and have been a staple of argument over the last several decades within the academy.

Brendan: I've heard several persuasive arguments for why this schedule reshuffling is good for golf and different golf organizations.

To support his argument that we and other animals don't have an evolved capacity for number per se, Nunez cites several different strands of research in the current literature, including experimental work with humans from non-industrialized cultures, which suggests an imprecise approach to quantity.

And it's one of several cockamamie arguments advanced by viewers given a platform for their unconventional theories in Room 237, an odd duck of a documentary about the conclusions reached by five different Kubrick fans upon very close analysis of The Shining.

I've seen several arguments for why this time is different, and why it's not a bubble.

Cabral's argument parallels the inverse moral logic that we see in several other aspects of no - kill militancy ---- a whole different phenomenon from realizing no - kill as the goal of a great amount of sustained targeted sterilization, so that unwanted dogs and cats are no longer born, entering shelters in huge numbers.

There is nothing that assumes knowledge like calculus or physics that takes several years to build up, and there are plenty of linked references such as «CO2 problem in 6 easy steps» or «Saturated Gassy Argument» which allows one to explore different approaches to the same issue.

If the argument is that due to CO2 rising, the present trend is different, then the low slope of 0.4 C per century is still not a problem for several centuries, and fossil fuel will be mainly replace long before then.

This kind of argument has taken several different forms such as, climate policies simply cost too much, will destroy jobs, harm the economy, or are not justified by cost - benefit analyses just to name a few cost - based arguments made frequently in opposition to climate change policies..

My own goal is to have readers (and maybe even but not necessarily Graeme) understand the invalidity of his argument asserting that (essentially) one sea level time series observation at one coastal location that (allegedly) doesn't show much change in several decades does not imply that the sea level changes have been the same at all other coastal locations (give or take 100 mm)- which implies that any observed variations exceeding this level in sea level rise at different locations around the world are «not real» and hence sea level rise due to global warming isn't anything to worry about.

So writing and oral argument are our two main weapons, but the different activities that take place in our office that enable the writing and oral argument are several.

At oral argument, counsel for Cuozzo argued that the PTAB should apply the Phillips claim construction analysis to IPR proceedings for several reasons: 1) BRI only applies when a claim under review may be freely amended; 2) Congress intended the IPR process to be «adjudicatory» rather than «examinational;» and 3) the two different standards would result in anomalies, including situations where claims mean «one thing for patentability in the Board, but a wholly different thing for infringement in the district courts.»

So I think we have several different strands of concerns and arguments swirling around, and it might do us good to separate them out and clarify the issues.