Sentences with phrase «several federal appeals»

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

Not exact matches

Meanwhile, a U.S. appeals court in New York is set to take its turn today at considering the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act, a federal law restricting the recognition of same - sex unions that has already been struck down in several other places.

The decision is one of several in recent months by federal appeals courts grappling with cases involving students who create Web pages ridiculing school administrators or fellow students.

There are several reasons why financial institutions find term federal funds to be a convenient and appealing tactic for efficient business operations.

In a decision that strikes a blow against the federal government's controversial practice of excluding industry from consent decrees with environmental citizen groups, a practice known as «sue - and - settle,» the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a consent decree between a coalition of environmental groups and several federal agencies in Conservation Northwest v. Sherman, No. 11 - 35729 (9th Cir.

Responding to a notice of appeal from several states, including coal - reliant West Virginia and Kentucky, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency told a federal court that its Clean Power Plan can't be appealed because it is not final until it is published in the Federal Refederal court that its Clean Power Plan can't be appealed because it is not final until it is published in the Federal ReFederal Register.

A group representing several energy companies and ratepayers said it would appeal a federal judge's ruling that upholds New York's plan to subsidize nuclear power plants in the state.

Hall v. Hall, No. 16 - 1150, holding that when one of several cases consolidated under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42 (a) is finally decided, that decision confers an immediate right to appeal.

Joe Regalia Joe Regalia clerked for several years in federal district courts and at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Ms. Espino MacLean has litigated cases in several federal courts, including the Fifth Circuit, Eleventh Circuit and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals.

This is contrary to (and overrules) several years of precedent from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which has held repeatedly that you can not infringe an invalid patent and so reasonable arguments that a patent was invalid prevent induced infringement liability.2

We have tried cases successfully to verdict or judgment throughout Utah and Nevada federal and state courts and in several other jurisdictions, and we have handled numerous appeals in federal and state courts.

Our trial and appellate attorneys are admitted to practice in federal and state courts in Utah, federal and state courts in several other states, various United States Circuit Courts of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently ruled that a plaintiff not named as a joint inventor on several patents and pending patent applications has standing to maintain an action to correct inventorship under 35 U.S.C. § 256, despite the fact that he previously assigned all rights...

In an unusual en banc decision rendered without requesting briefing from the parties, the United States, or interested amici curiae, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently affirmed several rulings in favor of Apple Inc. in its ongoing smartphone patent war with Samsung.

It also finds that readability has a stronger relationship to summary judgment success in federal courts than in state courts.2 After several earlier studies of appellate brief quality and success on appeal yielded conflicting results, our finding paves the way for additional research.

The Federal Court of Appeal's decision Friday not to hear an appeal by the government of British Columbia and several B.C. municipalities opposed to a ruling of the National Energy Board that allows Kinder Morgan Canada to ignore local permits and bylaws undoubtedly illustrates the strength of Alberta's legal arguAppeal's decision Friday not to hear an appeal by the government of British Columbia and several B.C. municipalities opposed to a ruling of the National Energy Board that allows Kinder Morgan Canada to ignore local permits and bylaws undoubtedly illustrates the strength of Alberta's legal arguappeal by the government of British Columbia and several B.C. municipalities opposed to a ruling of the National Energy Board that allows Kinder Morgan Canada to ignore local permits and bylaws undoubtedly illustrates the strength of Alberta's legal arguments.

This order was upheld on appeal and again at the S.C.C. Apotex then commenced an impeachment action in the Federal Court seeking a declaration that the «777 Patent was invalid on several grounds including lack of utility.

These days, since there is now a right to appeal a criminal conviction under state law or federal statute (but not the U.S. Constitution), a writ of habeas corpus is only brought when direct appeals of a conviction have been exhausted, often several years after the original conviction (which makes a writ of habeas corpus only useful for convictions involving long sentences of incarceration).

What is troubling about the latter citation is that the rationale used by the Federal Court of Appeal was that the information could not be considered especially sensitive since it had passed through several hands.

She has authored several amicus briefs in employment discrimination and constitutional cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and in other matters before the Colorado Supreme Court and several federal courts of appeals.

In line with a growing trend reflected in decisions from state supreme courts (those in Georgia, Massachusetts and Oregon), as well as from several federal trial courts, the New York intermediate appeals court recognized that «attorneys who have sought the advice of their law firm's in - house general counsel on their ethical obligations in representing a firm client may [properly] invoke [the] attorney - client privilege to resist the client's demand for the disclosure of communications seeking or giving such advice.»

There have been several Supreme Court of Canada (the «Supreme Court «-RRB- and Federal Court of Appeal decisions involving s. 7 of the Charter and Canadian immigration law.

He is admitted to practice in Pennsylvania and before the United States Supreme Court, the Third, Fifth and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeal, and several federal district courts.

While the Federal Court of Appeal held five years ago that the Amazon.com «one - click» buy interface feature was a patentable subject matter, the Patent Appeal Board of Canada found several investor tools to be patent ineligible.

David is also admitted before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit as well as several District Courts.

Even with the «discounted» financial damage, Apple is still the clear winner, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (a specialized body that handles patent appeals) made it clear that a range of Samsung's devices infringed several of Apple's patented inventions for the Appeals for the Federal Circuit (a specialized body that handles patent appeals) made it clear that a range of Samsung's devices infringed several of Apple's patented inventions for the appeals) made it clear that a range of Samsung's devices infringed several of Apple's patented inventions for the iPhone.

The State appealed (unsuccessfully) on several issues that have featured many times before in Federal Court litigation.