Sentences with phrase «several grant review»
She has also served as a panelist on several grant review panels including Miami - Dade County Department of Cultural Affairs, State of Florida Division of Cultural Affairs, Southern Arts Federation, Arts & Humanities Council of Montgomery County, Ohio Arts Council and Miami Light Project's Here & Now Festival.
https://girlsclubcollection.org/ Not exact matches
In its review of the contract, Educators 4 Excellence, an advocacy group of teachers that often was aligned with the Bloomberg administration's goals, gave the contract a barely passing grade and said it «overlooked several critical issues,» such as class sizes and a tenure - granting process that the group believes ought to be more closely linked to teacher performance.
Farajidavar secured priceless advice about grant funding practices from his PI, who had served on review panels for several national agencies.
NCI has had to postpone «several site visits to evaluate re-competing centers and large grant applications, and it has postponed more than a dozen meetings to review grant applications.
Ask several colleagues who have study section experience to review your grant.
When reviewing grants, you need to take into account several criteria related to the independence of the applicants.
Crittenden has published 27 peer - reviewed journal articles and eight peer - reviewed book chapters thus far, has received a Regents» Rising Researcher Award from the Nevada System of Higher Education, has been awarded several highly competitive research grants, and has demonstrated a commitment to increasing inclusiveness and diversity within the STEM fields through several mentorship initiatives she participates in.
He was commissioned for several international advisory activities, including a research program site review at the National University of Ireland (commissioned by the Science Foundation of Ireland) and grant reviews for the Medical Research Council in the United Kingdom, the Agence Nationale de la Recherche in France, and the Wellcome Trust in the United Kingdom.
In 1996, in response to these concerns, Varmus, then director of NIH, impaneled a group of experienced clinical investigators and academic health center administrators to make recommendations that might guide the NIH toward policy changes to alleviate the concerns in the clinical research community.14 Several of the panel's recommendations have been implemented, including increased support of the General Clinical Research Center budget, expanded support of training in clinical research, and the establishment of NIH - sponsored educational debt relief programs for clinical investigators.15 - 18 The panel also recommended restructuring of NIH peer review groups so that patient - oriented grant applications would be evaluated by study sections in which at least half the grant applications involve patient - oriented research.
She published more than 180 peer review papers, is funded by several granting agencies, including the Michael J Fox Foundation, and sits on several national and international review panels.
She was a permanent member of several NIH grant review panels and chair of the NIH Skeletal Biology Development and Disease Study Section.
Washington — Several conservative scholars and political activists who have criticized the activities of the Education Department may soon be assigned by that department to review proposals for federal grants, according to information obtained from the National Institute of Education (nie).
Grants will be awarded in June, preceded by several months of application review.
The PTAB offers several new procedures: Inter Partes Review (IPR), Covered Business Method Review (CBM), Post Grant Review (PGR), and Derivation Proceedings (DER).
According to Dr. Shane's analysis, expanding the ability for administrative challenges by adopting a «litigation - like mechanism for third party - initiated post grant review and expand the existing inter partes reexamination process,» would likely have several adverse effects, including:
In a recent review of the distribution of research grant emphases in the area of violence, several NIH institutes classified their studies into one of three categories: (a) preintervention studies, which included risk or protective studies, population - based epidemiological studies, or basic prevention development; (b) efficacy studies, which included laboratory trials of the impact of specific preventive or treatment interventions targeted at disruptive behavior disorders, including conduct disorder; and (c) effectiveness research, which included studies of the effectiveness, dissemination, or transportability of interventions into community (nonacademic) settings.
As with several of the other lenders, Guild Mortgage acted as a «direct endorsement lender» in the FHA insurance program, which grants the lender the authority to originate, underwrite and endorse mortgages for FHA insurance without prior review or approval from the FHA.