The driver asked the Supreme Court to consider
several issues on appeal.
Not exact matches
I myself have about $ 48,000 in student loan debt, and about $ 30,000 in collection fees, my loans was the Alaska state student loans, I get harassing calls all the time, I have my Alaska PFD garnished, they took away my state pharmacy tech license so I could not work, they said if I brought my account up to par (
several thousand dollars paid asap) I could get it re-instated with requests and
appeals, they send me letters saying they are going to garnish my wages, seize bank accounts, and basically put me
on the street, one of the representatives
on the phone told me after I asked her what people do when they cant afford a $ 1500 monthly payment or more, she said «you need to get 2 - 3 jobs then now don't you» my credit is ruined, if I get a job I face garnishments and bank account seizures, I also have been in the process of filing for disability due to my medical
issues, and just simply cant pay the debt, what can I do?
In response, the Hemp Industries Association (HIA) and
several other plaintiffs filed an «Urgent Motion for Stay» of the DEA interpretive rule, and
on March 7, 2002, the 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals issued a stay of the interpretive rule.
«The Supreme Court has spoken
several times
on this
issue but the courts of
appeal never really got it, until now,» said Mark S. Arisohn, of Labaton Sucharow in New York and Adelson's attorney.
ION opposed the petition largely
on the grounds that the case was a poor vehicle for the Court to consider extraterritorial damages under § 271 (f) because of other
issues in the case, including that the USPTO's Patent Trial and
Appeal Board subsequently found
several claims in WesternGeco's patent to be unpatentable in an inter partes review proceeding.
The case lasted
several years through hearings,
appeals, remand, and involved many
issues of contract interpretation, defamation and corporate law, Mr. Frankel never lost sight of the ultimate goal and kept his staff and the other attorneys working
on our team focused and
on task.
He has appeared in
several of the leading FOIA
appeals before the Upper Tribunal and advises individuals, corporations and governments
on information rights
issues and disputes.
The State
appealed (unsuccessfully)
on several issues that have featured many times before in Federal Court litigation.