Sentences with phrase «several orders of the court»

[39] Strathy J. described the record for the Estate of Edward Assaf as comprised of «over thirty lawsuits or applications and over one hundred and thirty court orders or endorsements... including several orders of the Court of Appeal and of the Supreme Court of Canada.»

Not exact matches

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

Malliotakis» plan calls for action in several categories, including expanded legal efforts to compel hospitalization via use of «Kendra's Law,» review expiring orders of protection, scrutinize mentally ill inmates before release, expand mental health courts and psychiatric capacity of hospitals, support relevant non-profit agencies and greatly expand the number of supportive housing units.

As a legal luminary, acting President Osinbajo knows the implication of wilful disobedience to court orders by Buhari's administration, especially on several bails granted to some personalities who are still being detained illegally, he nevertheless refused to act or intervene professionally on the legal dilemmas probably to prove his absolute loyalty to the administration.

«That the applicant, who knows full well that she is on bail in the United Kingdom where she is being investigated for several financial crimes, and that she would not be able to leave that country in view of the ongoing investigation and imminent trial, is seeking the order of this honourable court for the charge before this honourable court to be amended to include her name on the face of the charge in order for her to escape from investigation and prosecution in the United Kingdom under the guise that she is coming to face her trial before this honourable court and also to scuttle the trial before this honourable court.»

His seat was one of several to see substantial changes when Florida courts ordered the Senate maps redrawn ahead of the 2016 elections.

Nnamdi Kanu was granted bail on a lesser charge but was rearrested on two occasions until the government filed higher charges relating to terrorism and treason and found courts which rightly on the basis of the more severe charges refused bail; Dasuki's case is more complicated - today there are valid orders of bail made by several courts in his favour, but he has consistently been re-arrested and a charge of leaving the army improperly over two decades ago is now being added to his alleged crimes -LRB-!)

; Patrick Akpolobolokemi, the former NIMASA Director - General was rough - handled and bundled into a van right in front of the court premises where a judge had just granted him bail; several persons are known to have been detained for periods far in excess of the constitutionally mandated 48 hours initially under spurious detention orders signed by magistrates courts in the Federal Capital Territtory!

As a legal luminary, acting President Osinbajo knows the implication of willful disobedience to court orders by Buhari's administration, especially on several bails granted to some personalities who are still being detained illegally, he nevertheless refused to act or intervene professionally on the legal dilemmas probably to prove his absolute loyalty to the administration.

QUEENSBURY — The final results of several races in the Nov. 8 election were put on hold this week, as a court order halted the counting of absentee and provisional ballots across an 11 - county region.

It said the slide into fascism started with the invasion of the Akwa Ibom State Government House by the DSS and the continued detention of several people despite courts orders to the contrary.

After several years of legal challenges, the court order was overturned, and CMS was instructed that it could no longer determine student assignments based on race.

This is not only as a result of Australia reportedly having one of the highest rates of infringement in the world — but also due to the legal victory in May of the owners of the film Dallas Buyers Club, in which the Federal Court ordered several Australian ISPs to hand over personal details of more than 4700 customers alleged to have illegally downloaded the film.

APPS sent several emails to the Commissioners, reminding them that they agreed to post resolutions at least two weeks before every Action Meeting as part of the court - ordered settlement to our 2016 Sunshine Act violation suit.

Boutrous and Lipshutz cite several historic U.S. Supreme Court cases in their argument that public education meets the fundamental - right test, including Washington v. Glucksberg, in which the Court found that public education is «deeply rooted in this Nation's history and tradition» and «implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.»

If a creditor does challenge the discharge of a debt, Ginsberg states that the recourse is to negotiate a partial payment plan for that particular debt or to convert the case to a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, which requires a court - ordered repayment plan over several years.

As part of a Chapter 13 action, in which the court orders a repayment plan for the debtor to complete over several years, the second mortgage is stripped from the home and viewed in the same way as unsecured debt, such as credit card and medical bills.

In the wake of a hearing last month on this and several related lawsuits, a Federal District Court judge in Washington, D.C., this week ordered the Interior Department to explain its decision not to seek the greatest protection.

They now have several hundred chapters and thousands of volunteers, who write letters - to - the editor and visit congressional representatives, so that, when the court gives the order, there will be understanding and support for the approach that can actually work: an across - the - board rising carbon fee with the funds distributed equally to all residents.

The Appellant brought an action in the BC Supreme Court seeking a declaration that the Respondent was using its official mark without authorization, and seeking several orders including one requiring transfer of the domain names to it.

If you can't agree, how to approach your situation will depend on several factors, most importantly whether you have a court order or custody agreement that makes it clear you have legal custody of your grandkids.

The conclusion can be drawn from several authorities that although the court has jurisdiction to make a non-party order, even if the conduct complained of has not caused the applicant to incur the costs sought, it will be rare for the court to make an order in the absence of causation.

Although the Court upheld the publication ban in this case, the Court rightly noting several parts of the order are already in the public domain and may have been inappropriately subject to a publication ban.

When faced with an application to vary an order, the court should not ignore a mutually - accepted separation agreement such as the one reached by these spouses; however, it will be only one of several factors that goes into the threshold question of whether there has been a «material change» in circumstances since the initial order was made.

Heartless bypass The ECtHR stated in its judgment that had the authority sought to evict the husband under the Housing Act 1985, s 84, it would have been open to him to ask the court to determine whether or not the wife had really left the home because of domestic violence and whether or not, in his personal circumstances, including his need to provide accommodation for his children during overnight visits several time a week, it was reasonable to grant a possession order.

Yet in several cases recently, this court has seen troubling failures to produce exculpatory evidence in violation of the law and this court's orders.

In its decision against Google, the majority of the Court noted that «This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that were in violation of several court orCourt noted that «This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that were in violation of several court orcourt orders.

On February 29, 2008, the Supreme Court of Missouri issued an order making several revisions to Rule 10.

The case was favorably settled after the Court issued a claim construction order adopting several of the Defendants» key positions advanced during the Markman hearing and after a number of significant admissions were obtained during the depositions of the inventors.

Defence counsel Joseph Neuberger conducted several extensive judicial pre-trials in order to set out the basis of the defence, in particular securing evidence establishing that the main charges were part of an elaborate scheme in which fabricated allegations were used to secure exclusive possession of the matrimonial home and to gain an advantage in Family court.

The order is confounding several lawyers close to the investigation, Cotts writes, in that it appears to conflict with an order by Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts transferring the Kozinski investigation to Anthony Scirica, chief judge of the 3rd Circuit in Philadelphia.

Having examined the foundational weaknesses of the Bell coalition's website blocking plan (existing Canadian law, weak piracy evidence, limited impact) and its negative effects (lack of court orders, overblocking, ineffectiveness, violation of net neutrality, vulnerability on freedom of expression grounds, higher Internet costs, privacy risks), the case against the plan enters the final phase with several posts on how it fails to meet the requirements under the Telecommunications Act.

The Court of Appeal in Tiger Calcium overturned multiple Anton Pillar orders obtained without notice for several reasons, including the following.

Update June 8, 2017 — Today the BC Court of Appeal ordered a new trial in this case finding the trial judge made several errors.

In evaluating the best interests of a child in determining custody in the case of a proposed relocation of one parent, the trial court may appropriately consider several factors including: the advantages of the relocation in terms of its capacity to improve the life of the child; the motives of the custodial parent in seeking the move; the likelihood that the custodial parent will comply with visitation orders when he or she is no longer subject to the jurisdiction of the courts of North Carolina; the integrity of the noncustodial parent in resisting the relocation; and the likelihood that a realistic visitation schedule can be arranged which will preserve and foster the parental relationship with the noncustodial parent.

Often several applications on the same file are heard at once (for example, child support and spousal support, along with parenting orders), which is usually a more efficient way of dealing with disagreements between parties than having multiple court appearances.

The use of TAR have been accepted by courts in various jurisdictions - firstly with several US cases, then in early 2016 in the UK with the High Court Phrrho Investments Ltd v MWB Property LTD case [2016] EWHC 256 (Cth), and finally in December 2016 in Australia in a decision of the Supreme Court of Victoria (McConnell Dowell Constructors (Aust) Pty Ltd v Santam Ltd & Ors (No 1)[2016] VSC 734), and orders in a Federal Court of Australia matter (Money Max Int v QBE Insurance, VID513 / 2015) relating to the TAR algorithms used and methodology in the training and validation.

The materials which an accused person is entitled to receive from the Crown in order to attempt to raise such a doubt has been the subject of debate in Alberta courts (and elsewhere in Canada) for several years.

Belize Bank Ltd. v. Gov» t of Belize, No. 14 - cv - 659 (D.D.C., 2016), is one of several recent cases in which the District Court for the District of Columbia ordered the Government of Belize («Belize») to pay an arbitration award.

In a case argued by Partner Seth Waxman on behalf of a Louisiana death - row inmate, the US Supreme Court on Monday, May 14, 2018, overturned several murder convictions and ordered a new trial after finding that the condemned man's trial attorney violated his constitutional rights.

While Jesner suggests that five justices likely would rule that the federal courts should not recognize an ATS cause of action against American corporations for their overseas activities, several federal appeals courts have exhibited little willingness to limit the scope of ATS liability unless directly ordered to do so by the Supreme Court.

The best interests of the child principle is most before the courts in a custody or access dispute, but in reality this principle impacts several areas of family law, and will be considered by the courts when making any order that pertains to a child.

This order was upheld on appeal and again at the S.C.C. Apotex then commenced an impeachment action in the Federal Court seeking a declaration that the «777 Patent was invalid on several grounds including lack of utility.

The High Court of Ireland has ordered that several members of the Quinn family turn over to the receiver the passwords needed to access a number of their personal and business accounts.

This is not an order to remove speech that, on its face, engages freedom of expression values, it is an order to de-index websites that are in violation of several court orders.

Can Google can be ordered, pending a trial, to globally de-index the websites of a company which, in breach of several court orders, is using those websites to unlawfully sell the intellectual property of another company.

The Appellant alleged several grounds of appeal, including that the judge erred in his analysis of the child's habitual residence, in concluding that the Respondent had not acquiesced in the child's relocation, in failing to respect an order of the Montana court that it had no jurisdiction over the child's custody, and in failing to give effect to Article 13 (b) of the Hague Convention, which allows a court to refuse to return a child where there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation.

Comment: Several commenters asked that the «minimum necessary» standard not apply to disclosures made pursuant to a court order because individuals could then use the rule to contest the scope of discovery requests.

The High Court of Ireland has ordered that several members of the Quinn family turn... [more]

Despite attaining «tweet» levels between 1:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. generally only seen for the hottest Supreme Court of Canada decisions, actual page views of the decision were several orders of magnitudes higher than growth in referrals from twitter would suggest.