On the other hand,
several other commenters supported applying the minimum necessary standard to covered entities» disclosures to financial institutions for payment processing.
Both Norm Kalmanovitch and
several other commenters above have, however, a far too simplistic view of science, The science is far too multifaceted to allow for many of the proposals presented.
Elsi, Joobies and
several other commenters on the forum compared notes on how much they paid for shipping and the exact day that they hope to receive the reader.
I followed the recipe exactly and, like
several other commenters below (whose comments I unfortunately didn't read before starting), my «batter» was so dry it was almost like damp fine sand.
I have noted your reply and replies
several other commenters who intelligently add to the discussion.These types of replies make the blogging process enjoyable in spite of the other kinds of replies, trolls, and etc..
Not exact matches
The most helpful
commenter noted that they had used
several other containers previously, and this was the first set where the lids continued to lock after months of use.
A
commenter points out
several other problems, including the fact that at least some collected editions are more expensive on Diamond Digital than via comiXology or even in print.
I think some of the
commenters need to read each
other's comments: Jen Scoggins said... I have an existing Virtual Assistance business Monika said... I am doing the Virtual Author's Assistant course because
several of my clients are published authors YvonneW said... I work as a VA that specializes in internet marketing for my clients.
What I do not understand is why people play the Judith Curry style game of creating
several posts filled with
other people's quotations, making up hypothetical graphs, asking questions to the
commenters, and playing ¨ what if ¨ scenarios in their head, only to back off and play the ¨ I'm innocent ¨ card when someone tries to call them out on the bulls ** t.
There are
several commenters here who appear perfectly capable of coming up with their own figures (but haven't) and
several others who are so sure we are having a calamitous effect on our climate that I can only conclude they also have access to coherent estimates.
I have no affiliation with RC
other than a
commenter (and guest contributed a few times), and on
several occasions have expressed disagreement with an RC author.
Several commenters, particularly the New Fuels Alliance (NFA), made repeated comments that the LCFS sets up an unlevel playing field by not examining the indirect, price - induced GHG effects of
other fuels.
In recent discussion of the Weblog 2007 Awards,
several commenters at
other blogs have argued that our criticisms of the Mannian parlor tricks have been «thoroughly refuted and discarded by climatologists, published in a credible journal»; that «
other professionals in the field who also have «looked in great detail at the problem at hand» and have come to the conclusion that rather than McIntyre's findings being «valid and relevant», they instead have found them to be «without statistical and climatological merit»; that CA «fluffed on the whole hockey stick thing».
Third,
several commenters here as well as
other websites have taken it upon themselves to look at the qualifications of the authors of the IPCC.
Several commenters proposed that the rule provide for patients to receive only an accounting of disclosures made by medical records departments or some
other central location, which would relieve the burden of centralizing accounting for those entities who depend on paper records and tracking systems.
In addition,
several commenters asserted that the need for distinguishing research information unrelated to treatment from
other forms of protected health information was not necessary because the proposed rule's general restrictions for the use and disclosure of protected health information and the existing protections for research information were sufficiently strong.
Comments:
Several commenters recommended expanding the definition of public health authority to encompass
other governmental entities that may collect and hold health data as part of their official duties.
The
commenters noted that some of the aforementioned items are acknowledged in the proposed rule as future costs to covered entities, but
several others are singularly ignored.
Comment:
Several commenters urged that the proposed standard for deceased individuals be clarified to allow access by a family member who has demonstrated a legitimate health - related reason for seeking the information when there is no executor, administrator, or
other person authorized under applicable law to exercise the right of access of the individual.
Other commenters indicated that once a transaction leaves a provider or plan electronically, it may flow through
several entities before reaching a clearinghouse.
An industry forum such as this is interaction among
commenters, not just article specific; and this example contradicts what AM just posted and did so
several times when attacking you and
others.