Not exact matches
What's clear is that we shouldn't sweep research on
sex - based brain
differences under the carpet
in the interest of political correctness, just because some misguided writers use the field to make sweeping generalizations about men's and women's abilities and
personalities.
The
differences lie
in the individual
personality of the animal not
in it's
sex.
Claxitone (2012) surveyed a study on 125 couples who are interested
in opposite
sex that got married for a long time,
personality traits of both parties and relative
differences of
personality concepts as predictor of marital satisfaction.
Journals & Magazines ADHD Report Anxiety, Stress and Coping Autism Childhood Contemporary Hypnosis Dementia Depression and Anxiety Dreaming Drug and Alcohol Review Dyslexia Early Child Development and Care Eating Disorders Educational Assessment Illness, Crisis & Loss Industrial - Organizational Psychologist Journal of Gambling Studies Journal of Happiness Studies Journal of Mental Health and Aging Journal of
Sex & Marital Therapy Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment Language and Cognitive Processes Loss, Grief & Care Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Metaphor and Symbol Neuropsychological Rehabilitation Parenting Personal Relationships
Personality and Individual
Differences Psychiatric Bulletin Psychology of Men & Masculinity Psychology Today ReVision: A Journal of Consciousness and Transformation Stress and Health Studies
in Gender and Sexuality Substance Abuse Suicide and Life - Threatening Behavior Trauma, Violence & Abuse
These include how couples should deal with
personality differences, what to do when you start to lose the «
in love» feeling, his advice for a great
sex life, and how to deal with your Love Languages over the course of a marriage.
[jounal] Harris, C. R. / 2003 / A review of
sex differences in sexual jealousy, including self - report data, psychophysiological responses, interpersonal violence, and morbid jealousy /
Personality and Social Psychology Review 7: 102 ~ 128