85 % of Americans support responsible, age - appropriate, medically accurate
sex education in schools; Planned Parenthood believes that it is critical that our young people have access to accurate information and services.
It has long been proven that abstinence - only education simply does not work, and yet 26 states are currently disillusioned by thinking that focusing on abstinence is the best solution to
sex education in schools.
Prior took time for an interview with Planned Parenthood Advocates of Arizona, and in that interview, he touched on some of the problems this state faces: a high teen birth rate, biased and inadequate
sex education in our schools, legislation that interferes with private decisions between doctors and patients, and a religious agenda that stands in the way of a woman's right to choose.
The interesting thing about that is that nine of the Top 10 states all have abstinence - only
sex education in their schools.
Alaska and Kansas are the most recent states to pass laws that impact
sex education in its schools.
We applaud Sen. Lautenberg, Rep. Lee, and Rep. Shays for recognizing the vital need for medically accurate, comprehensive
sex education in our schools.»
I support comprehensive
sex education in our schools because children have questions early on.
In the case of
sex education in schools, teaching abstinence only has not been working.
To support these goals, Ms. Butler is in favor of including comprehensive
sex education in schools to empower students with the information they need to avoid sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies — the latter of which will help reduce dropout rates among teenage girls.
Prevention is simple, and yet there is so much misinformation about HIV You can do your part in preventing the spread of HIV: become educated about HIV, insist on medically accurate and informative
sex education in our schools, ALWAYS use condoms or dental dams, and advocate for research into the causes and cures for HIV.
Parents support
sex education in schools and want to be a part of the conversation.
There have been recent newspaper articles calling for improved
sex education in schools across the world.1, 2 Sometimes the focus is on sexuality and relationships education in a general context, other times it's concerned with specific areas of education that principals and educators believe should be implemented in as many schools as possible using a whole - school approach.
Although gay dating sites provide a useful platform in allowing men to meet...
Sex education in schools is, at best, perfunctory, and for gay kids it's largely non-existent.
See Preeyanat Phanayanggoor, «Social Vaccine Scheme to Give Better
Sex Education in Schools,» Bangkok Post, July 13, 2004, p. 2.
And don't forget about Ramdev's belief that yoga education should replace
sex education in schools or that yoga can cure both cancer and AIDS.
Study author, Wendy Macdowall, Lecturer at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, said: «Our results suggest we need a broader framing of
sex education in schools that addresses the needs of both young men and women, with a move away from the traditional female - focused «periods, pills and pregnancy» approach.
«He told Planned Parenthood at their conference yesterday that «it's the right thing to do to provide age - appropriate sex education, science - based
sex education in schools.»
Yesterday, the Conservatives successfully blocked Labour plans to introduce compulsory
sex education in schools, a measure which was due to be rushed through Parliament before the election.
Nearly three in ten said they needed more
sex education in schools, but weren't getting it.
The debate over
sex education in schools is not really about whether it's appropriate or not.
Paradoxically, SPUC's own «Safe at School» campaign opposes what it calls the «explicit nature of
sex education in schools», addressing parents across the country about the perceived harms of SRE.
This country is pathetically puritanical when it comes to
sex education in our schools.
Of course, after years of
sex education in schools we have not managed to stem the high rates of teenage pregnancy or been able to prevent ever increasing rates of sexually transmitted disease.
A Christian organisation that runs
sex education in schools says more young people need to know the dangers... More
It beats me why children / teenagers should have prolonged detailed
sex education in schools.
But Britain's domestic policy is more confused: parents still have the right to withdraw their children from
sex education in school.
«It is very important to have
sex education in every school, in every synagogue, in every church,» she says, so that no children are surprised or scared by what is happening to their bodies.
Kevin Courtney, joint general secretary of the NEU, said: «The National Education Union welcomes the government's commitment to introduce statutory Relationships and
Sex Education in every school.
Students who receive this type of
sex education in school are able to form a more positive view of their own bodies and feel better prepared to make well - informed decisions.
To make things worse, you might not have had evidence - based, medically accurate
sex education in your school.
Not exact matches
Catherine Lhamon, the Department of
Education's assistant secretary for civil rights, said
in a statement that the government would «vigorously enforce Title IX's prohibition against discrimination on the basis of
sex, including gender identity,
in every applicable
school.»
This would mean repealing anti-sodomy laws, permitting homosexuals to serve
in the military on the same terms as heterosexuals, including lessons about homosexuality
in public
school sex -
education programs, and legalizing homosexual marriage and divorce.
In one case the Bishop of Lancaster, Patrick O'Donoghue, instructed Catholic schools across much of north - west England to stop «safe - sex» education and place crucifixes in all classroom
In one case the Bishop of Lancaster, Patrick O'Donoghue, instructed Catholic
schools across much of north - west England to stop «safe -
sex»
education and place crucifixes
in all classroom
in all classrooms.
Rachel: You note that while Catholics, African Americans, Hispanics and many Mainline Protestants have continued to be involved
in public
education, White evangelical Christians are largely absent, until a «culture war» issue arises --(around
school - led prayer, evolution,
sex ed, etc.)-- and the protests begin.
You've heard the horror stories about the
schools: kindergartens with a dose of amoral
sex education; teachers sowing gender confusion with the hearty support of administrators; violence and widespread drug use
in the tony prep
schools that train tomorrow's elites; depression, eating disorders,....
The response of the last government was essentially more of the same: earlier and more detailed
sex education, family planning clinics
in schools, promotion of emergency birth control (otherwise known as the «morning after pill») easier access to abortion, all without the need for parental consent even
in the case of underage girls.
Rather it frees governors and headteachers to focus more on deciding what type of
sex education parents want their children to experience
in school and,
in the case of primary
schools, whether there should be any formal
sex education at all.
Sex education is currently taught
in Guatemala
schools but campaigners say it is often incomplete or irrelevant, as less than half the girls
in Guatemala attend secondary
schools.
The Connexions service,
school nurse service and Healthy
Schools standards are just a few of the many routes whereby inappropriate
sex education or access to abortion and contraception may sneak
in under the radar of unwary teachers and governors.
Dear Father Editor Congratulations on your July issue — which seriously addresses the virtues of chastity and the danger
in schools when immoral
sex education is taught.
Matters came to crisis point a year ago when the last government's Children,
Schools & Family Bill sought to impose a statutory sex and relationship education (SRE) curriculum on all schools from the primary stage (currently SRE is only compulsory in secondary schools and the content can be determined by each school) and to remove the right of parents to withdraw their children from inappropriate SRE lessons from the age
Schools & Family Bill sought to impose a statutory
sex and relationship
education (SRE) curriculum on all
schools from the primary stage (currently SRE is only compulsory in secondary schools and the content can be determined by each school) and to remove the right of parents to withdraw their children from inappropriate SRE lessons from the age
schools from the primary stage (currently SRE is only compulsory
in secondary
schools and the content can be determined by each school) and to remove the right of parents to withdraw their children from inappropriate SRE lessons from the age
schools and the content can be determined by each
school) and to remove the right of parents to withdraw their children from inappropriate SRE lessons from the age of 15.
For example, churches may participate
in interracial dialogue programs, preschool
education programs such as Head Start, nursery
school programs for children of working mothers, alcoholism
education programs,
sex education programs, open housing programs, health and
education programs for migrant workers.
For instance, the church
school should supplement whatever the public
schools do
in the area of
sex education and preparation for family life by relating these areas to the Christian understanding of the good life.
These principles also indicate the standards to be used
in sex education — the basic ideals to be inculcated by explicit instruction
in homes and at appropriate levels
in schools, and even more essentially by the complex of accepted acts built into social and cultural patterns.
It needs also to be stated that parents who send their children to a Catholic
school have a right to be included
in the way the
sex education programme is developed and implemented.
[10] As mentioned above, shortly to be published Australian research of mine found that: «84 \ % of parents believe that parents should play at least an equal role with
schools in sex education.»
Although this is an extreme case, Catholic parents have become increasingly concerned at the content of
sex education in many of our
schools.
The appalling Channel 4 «Living and Growing»
sex education material has caused something of a visceral shock to parents who have perhaps previously not enquired too closely what their
school is teaching
in sex education.
As this magazine has chronicled, they largely surrendered
in the fight against compulsory
sex education (of a profoundly corrupting kind), most especially concerning non-Catholic
schools.
Under legislation passed last year, relationships
education is now compulsory
in all primary
schools, while
sex and relationships
education is compulsory
in secondaries.