Sentences with phrase «sex relationships did»

and the word for this type of relationship, what we know as homosexual, that word FOR a same - sex relationship didn't exist until 1869.

Not exact matches

Not only do you have money, time, sex, work, family, kids, vacations, etc., but then on top of those basics you also have money for the company, time for the company, your individual relationships with the company.

So, fishon, why exactly do you think that a loving, monogamous relationship between two people of the same sex is sin?

However, I do know that in America there is a kind of religious or cultural feeling against anal sex even in heterosexual relationships.

When I lust or have sex with men outside of a covenant relationship, I sin (the reason I think it's sin, however, is probably different from why you do).

I know in the past there have been issues with contraception and sex for procreation only, but I personally don't have problems with contraception and non-procreative sex in a marriage relationship.

His wife, Peggy, believes as I do, that committed, monogamous gay relationships are not sinful and Tony believes that homosexual sex is sinful but that homosexual orientation is not (i.e. gay folks should be celibate).

The shift in our understanding of sex from a sacramental and life - changing encounter to the thing you do with your friends when you're bored has made all of our relationships shallower and made each of us less capable of the profound gift of self on which marriage is founded.

The Court did not simply allow new relationships; it required their recognition as marriages, as similar to opposite - sex bonds in every important way.

This is one of the reasons why artificialcontraception has had such damage upon marriages and relationships: the couple deliberately withhold their fertility and so no longer give themselves completely to each other; in doing this they deny not just the meaning of sex itself but they also subtract from loving one of its «givens» - the orientation towards giving oneself completely to one's spouse.

«Within a few months the relationship became physical, which I was conflicted about because I didn't believe in sex before marriage.

Being queer does not make up the entirety of my being, any more than being a photographer, a traveler, a blogger, etc... Sex is a normal part of a relationship, but it's NOT all there is to that relationship.

She said at the time: «At the moment, too many young people feel they don't have the relationships and sex education (RSE) they need to stay safe and navigate becoming an adult.

Gareth Cheeseman from the Christian charity Acet UK which runs sex education classes said: «Our concern at the moment is the number of young people who don't receive any relationship and sex education because their teachers are untrained and they don't have the curriculum time to cover it, anything that can help tackle that issue has the potential to be a positive force.»

But it does appear to be true that, as Dias wrote, InterVarsity will maintain doctrinal accountability by asking any staff who disagree with IVCF's conservative stance on homosexuality, same - sex relationships, and gender to inform their leadership, triggering a process of «involuntary termination.»

There is a hint in Mr Dell's letter that he does not see condition of being attracted to a sexual relationship with someone of the same sex as in itself wounded.

It had nothing to do with a loving relationship between two people of the same sex, and homosexuality was NOT the sin of Sodom in whatever form.

Again, it has nothing to do with two men (or two women) in a committed, loving relationship; it has to do with one being used for sex — something I think all of us would agree is WRONG.

According to Covenant Eyes, 56 per cent of divorce cases involved one party having an obsessive interest in porn, and in my survey of those struggling with sex and porn addiction, 46 per cent had lost a relationship and 71 per cent knew they were at risk of doing so.

Although the ELCA church did not allow clergy in same - sex relationships while he was attending seminary, Erwin said that he «always believed that this would someday be possible.»

Context does not establish any parameters on the type of same sex relationship that is considered perverted.

«For these men the term «monogamy» simply doesn't necessarily mean sexual exclusivity... The term «open relationship» has for a great many gay men come to have one specific definition: A relationship in which the partners have sex on the outside often, put away their resentment and jealousy, and discuss their outside sex with each other, or share sex partners.

A «relationship» does not necessarily mean sex, but it might.

Jesus did have something to say about same sex relationships...........

That wasn't even Olson's case, but with assists from a federal district court judge who came out as being in a same - sex relationship only after ruling and retiring, and elected officials who chose to forgo their traditional duty to vigorously defend state law, Olson and Boies did succeed in disenfranchising millions of Californians on a procedural technicality.

Gadamer, of how the inspired text, which we question in order to find its meaning and relevance, questions, criticizes, challenges and changes us in the process -» Some who today raise the proper question, whether there are not culturally relative elements in Paul's teaching about role relationships (an the material has to be thought through from this standpoint), seem to proceed improperly in doing so; for in effect they take current secular views about the sexes as fixed points, and work to bring Scripture into line with them - an agenda that at a stroke turns the study of sacred theology into a venture in secular ideology.

You also realizes Jesus had NOTHING to say on the subject of same sex relationships though he did cure the ill male lover of a solder?

Yo moron, read number 23 they were worshiping a pagan god using sex it has NOTHING to do with a long term loving relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

He knows the pain and devastation that «sex done wrong» can cause in both short - term and long - term relationships.

By investing themselves in enhancing the general quality of their relationship and improving their communication skills, they will probably do more to increase intimacy than by pouring their worried attention onto their «sex problem.»

I'm not one to say the world is immediately going to end if same sex relationships are soon defined as equivalent to opposite sex relationships, but its still a stupid thing to do.

The reason same - sex relations were condemned is because they were not in the context of a loving, long - term relationship (May I ask - do you tell homosexuals that are only in a short - term, sexual relationship that they are sinning, and if so what is their response?)

(New numbering system) 1) The confusion between homosexuality and same - sex relationships - Earlier you said «Homosexual acts can't be condemned because they didn't exist.

The more I look into what scripture does and does not say the more convinced I am that scripture does not «clearly» condemn or support same sex relationships.

It is a small book, and the supporting sociological evidence is mainly referenced in the footnotes, but Greeley does propose evidence that, among other things, Catholics have, compared to non-Catholics, a significantly higher appreciation of the arts and high culture; they have more satisfaction and fun in sex; they better understand the uses of leisure; they have a deeper and more stable relationship to family and community; they have a greater respect for the life of the mind, with educational achievements reflecting that respect; and they understand the nuanced connections between freedom and authority.

The truth is that, in historical context, the bible does not condemn a loving same - sex relationship.

It was refreshing the movie de-glorified sex, showing the girls it's not the monolithic thing they think it is, and that, crucially, their sexual experiences or orientations don't define their relationships with each other.

I guess I don't care what someone * calls * a loving same - sex relationship.

But I recognize a dilemma in that... if you do instruct / suggest to people to whom you minister that they be open to and not fear a same - sex relationship, most likely they will one day fall in love and enter into a relationship.

When Justin told one of his pastors that he didn't think the ex-gay ministries could make him straight, the pastor told him that as long as Justin remained celibate, he was welcome to continue worshipping with the congregation, but that if Justin entered a same - sex relationship, he would be asked to leave.

Do Christian leaders have an obligation to share their position on same - sex relationships?

I think you can tell from my posts that I do * not * think a same - sex relationship is sinful.

So my point is, no matter what you do, there are going to be the homophobic people out there, attempting to hide their prejudice behind a veneer of holiness, who are going to find a way to degrade any sort of relationship that an admittedly gay Christian has, regardless of whether it has anything to do with sex or not.

Maybe to get this started: Why * do * you believe that having a relationship to a member of the same sex is beneficial to you, to the relationship with your neighbor and to your relationship with God?

Abby: It was refreshing the movie de-glorified sex, showing the girls it's not the monolithic thing they think it is, and that, crucially, their sexual experiences or orientations don't define their relationships with each other.

Again, I don't think a gay relationship is a sin — I am proud to be a cat who wants to meow — but I wonder at times about people's intrusive concern with our sex lives.

Even if one believes that same - sex marriage or relationships are a sin, their existence doesn't threaten the very existence and sanctity of your own marriage.

They are about rape, worshiping a pagan god using sex, male prostitution, idolatry, none of it has to do with the loving long term relationship of a gay couple as we know and understand it today.

Not only does the Church need to get its own house in order, it also needs to find ways to speak with grace and compassion about porn, sex and relationships.

The new article's authors claim the original scholar committed «classification errors» because some of the same - sex relationships were very brief, even evanescent affairs, and so what he should have done is what they proceed to do: toss out data until they get a handful of same - sex households where a couple stayed together at least several years.